Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
changing the fees collected by a register of deeds, the redaction of social security numbers from electronic documents, and changes to the land information program.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, the Department of Administration (DOA) directs and
supervises the land information program and serves as a state clearinghouse for
access to land information. Under the land information program, DOA provides
technical assistance to state agencies and local governmental units with land
information responsibilities, reviews and approves county plans for land records
modernization, and provides aids to counties, derived from recording fee revenues
collected by counties, for land records modernization projects.
Also under current law, a county board may establish a land information office
or direct that the functions and duties of the office be performed by an existing county
office. If a land information office is established, it is required to coordinate land
information projects between different units and levels of government and between
the government and the private sector, develop and receive approval for a
countywide plan for land records modernization, and review and recommend
projects from local governmental units for grants from DOA.
Also under current law, counties collect a fee for recording and filing most
instruments that are recorded or filed with a register of deeds. The fee is $11 for the
first page of an instrument and $2 for each additional page. Counties must remit $7
of each $11 collected for recording or filing the first page of each instrument to DOA,
which DOA uses the revenues to make grants to counties for land records
modernization projects (modernization grants). However, if a county has established
a land information office, receives approval from DOA for its land records
modernization plan, and uses the money for certain specified purposes related to
land records modernization, the county may retain $5 of each $7 fee that would
otherwise be payable to DOA. Counties also collect a $25 fee for recording certain
probate certificates and for preparing and mailing certain probate documents.
Under this bill, counties collect a $25 fee, regardless of the number of pages of
the instrument, for recording or filing most instruments that are recorded or filed
with a register of deeds. Counties must remit $10 of each fee to DOA, which DOA
uses to make modernization grants. If a county has, in addition to the three
requirements under current law for retaining DOA fees, established a land
information council, the county may retain $8 of each $10 fee that would otherwise
be payable to DOA. Also under this bill, counties may temporarily collect a $30 fee
for recording or filing these instruments or for recording certain probate certificates
or preparing and mailing certain probate documents if the county uses $5 of each fee
for purposes of redacting social security numbers from certain electronic format
records. The $30 fee reverts to a $25 fee upon the earliest of the following: 1)
completion of redaction of social security numbers from certain electronic format
records; 2) January 1, 2012, unless an extension of time is granted by DOA; or 3)
January 1, 2015.
Also under this bill, when the register of deeds transfers instruments filed with
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Full history
- Feb 11, 2010 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Soletski, Hebl, Pope-Roberts, Smith, Lothian, Townsend, Vruwink, Dexter, Vos and Radcliffe;Cosponsored by Senators Erpenbach, Lehman, Hansen, Kreitlow, Vinehout, Risser, Taylor and Olsen
- Feb 11, 2010 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Urban and Local Affairs
- Feb 22, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Soletski
- Feb 22, 2010 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 24, 2010 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 24, 2010 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1