Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
the creation of a Fox Cities regional transit authority.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
The Biennial Budget Act,
2009 Wisconsin Act 28
(Act 28), authorized the
creation of the Dane County regional transit authority (RTA), the Chippewa Valley
RTA, and the Chequamegon Bay RTA. Each RTA, once created, is a public body
corporate and politic and a separate governmental entity.
This bill authorizes the creation of a Fox Cities RTA. Under the bill, the Fox
Cities RTA is created if the governing body of any two or more municipalities located
in whole or in part within the urbanized Fox Cities metropolitan planning area
(planning area) adopt a resolution authorizing the municipality to become a member
of the RTA and each resolution is ratified by the electors at a referendum held in the
municipality. Each resolution must also include an identical provision specifying the
number and composition of the RTA's board of directors. After the Fox Cities RTA
is created, any municipality located in whole or in part within the planning area, and
any municipality within the counties of Outagamie, Calumet, or Winnebago that is
outside the planning area, may also join the RTA if the governing body of the
municipality adopts a resolution to join the RTA, the resolution is ratified by the
electors at a referendum held in the municipality, and the board of directors of the
RTA approves. The jurisdictional area of the Fox Cities RTA is the geographic area
encompassing the combined territorial boundaries of all municipalities creating or
joining the RTA.
The provisions of current law, as created in Act 28, governing the powers and
duties of the Dane County RTA, the Chippewa Valley RTA, and the Chequamegon
Bay RTA also apply to the Fox Cities RTA. In brief, an RTA's authority is vested in
its board of directors and its bylaws govern its management, operations, and
administration. An RTA may: operate a transportation system or provide for its
operation by contracting with a public or private organization; impose, by its board
of directors adopting a resolution, a sales and use tax in the RTA's jurisdictional area
at a rate not exceeding 0.5 percent of the sales price if certain conditions are satisfied;
acquire property by condemnation; and issue tax-exempt revenue bonds. An RTA
has a duty to provide, or contract for the provision of, transit service within the RTA's
jurisdictional area. Rates and other charges received by an RTA must be used only
for the general expenses and capital expenditures of the RTA, to pay interest,
amortization, and retirement charges on the RTA's revenue bonds, and for specific
purposes of the RTA and may not be transferred to any political subdivision.
Finally, if the Fox Cities RTA imposes a sales tax, a political subdivision that
is a member of the RTA must decrease its property tax levy for transit purposes by
the amount of sales taxes collected in excess of the amount of federal funding the
political subdivision previously received for transit purposes.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report passage recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 7, Noes 4
Passed 7–4 Apr 9, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Assembly amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 52, Noes 45
Passed 52–45 Apr 22, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Read a third time and passed, Ayes 51, Noes 46
Passed 51–46 Apr 22, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Feb 11, 2010 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Bernard Schaber, Nelson, Hintz, Barca, Berceau, Black, Smith and Turner;Cosponsored by Senator Ellis
- Feb 11, 2010 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation
- Mar 1, 2010 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 11, 2010 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 11, 2010 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Apr 8, 2010 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Apr 9, 2010 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 7, Noes 4
- Apr 9, 2010 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 10:02 A.M. on 4-20-2010 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 24
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Roth
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representative Montgomery
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Placed at the foot of the calendar of 4-20-2010
- Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 52, Noes 45
- Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly
Point of order that Assembly amendment 2 not germane well taken
- Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 51, Noes 46
- Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 23, 2010 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Apr 28, 2010 · Senate
Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1