Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 750

Mandatory testing of prison inmates upon release for HIV or sexually transmitted diseases

Topics: Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, Corrections, Department of, Prison, Sentences and penalties, Venereal disease

Stopped in committee

It had a but no committee vote, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 15, 2010

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. It had a hearing but no committee vote.

  3. Assembly vote, not reached

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It sat with the Assembly Committee on Corrections and the Courts.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, a court may order a person to undergo testing to detect the presence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and sexually transmitted diseases if the person is: 1) an adult charged with or convicted of sexual assault, sexual assault or sexual exploitation of a child, incest with a child, or, if the person works at a school, sexual assault of a student; or 2) a child alleged to have committed sexual assault, sexual assault or sexual exploitation of a child, or incest with a child.

Current law also permits a court to order a person who is confined in a state prison or any other state, county, or municipal detention facility to be tested for the presence of communicable diseases if he or she assaults another prisoner or detainee or an officer, employee, or visitor at that facility by throwing or expelling blood, semen, vomit, saliva, urine, feces, or any other bodily substance at or toward the other person.

Read the full summary

Under this bill, a person who is confined in a state prison will be required to be tested for the presence of HIV and sexually transmitted diseases before being released. If the person has reached the end of his or her sentence, the Department of Corrections (DOC) will provide one mandatory test and the results before releasing him or her and then will offer one test between six and seven months after his or her release. If the person is being released to extended supervision or parole, DOC will provide two tests. Each individual will be tested the first time and the results will be provided before being released to extended supervision or on parole.

Then, as a condition of extended supervision or parole, the individual will be tested again generally between six and seven months after release from prison. The results of any test will be provided only to the person being released and to his or her spouse.

DOC will also offer counseling and education to the individual who was tested or to his or her spouse.

Who's behind it

3 representatives are its ⁠. All 3 are Democrats.

See all 3 names

Authors (3)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Mar 11, 2010

    The committee held a public hearing.

  3. Mar 10, 2010

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  4. Mar 8, 2010

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  5. Feb 15, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Corrections and the Courts.

  6. Feb 15, 2010

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Toles, Kessler and Staskunas

  2. Feb 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Corrections and the Courts

  3. Mar 8, 2010 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Mar 10, 2010 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Mar 10, 2010 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Mar 11, 2010 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  7. Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate