Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
allowing certain utilities to administer investment programs for energy efficiency improvements and renewable energy applications, creating requirements for political subdivision loans for similar improvements and applications, providing an exemption from emergency rule procedures, and granting rule-making authority.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill allows the Public Service Commission (PSC) to authorize an electric,
natural gas, or water public utility (utility) to administer, fund, or provide
administrative services for a program for investing in energy efficiency
improvements and renewable resource applications at any type of premises served
by the utility. The bill defines "energy efficiency improvement" as an improvement
that reduces the usage of energy or increases the efficiency of energy usage at
premises, and the bill defines "renewable resource application" as the application of
specified renewable energy resources, such as, for example, solar or wind power, at
premises. The bill allows the PSC to authorize a program only upon application by
a utility and prohibits the PSC from requiring that utilities participate in such a
program. In addition, if the utility is an investor-owned electric or natural gas utility
(energy utility), the PSC may authorize a program only if the PSC finds the program
is cost-effective. The bill requires a utility for which the PSC authorizes a program
to file a tariff with the PSC that specifies the terms and conditions of utility and
nonutility service provided to customers at premises where energy efficiency
improvements or renewable resource applications are made under the program. A
tariff has no effect until approved by the PSC.
In addition, the bill specifies that premises are not eligible for an investment
under an authorized program unless an audit is performed that demonstrates that
an energy efficiency improvement or renewable resource application is
cost-effective, as specified in rules promulgated by the PSC. The rules may specify
criteria that include comparing the cost of an improvement or application to the
value of the premises. In addition, for an energy efficiency improvement, the rules
may specify criteria that include the energy savings resulting from the improvement
and the period of time required for the energy savings to equal the cost of the
improvement. In addition, the PSC must promulgate rules requiring the
performance of audit after an energy efficiency improvement or renewable resource
application is made or installed. The purpose of such a postaudit is to verify that the
improvement or application was made or installed. The bill requires the PSC to
promulgate rules specifying the certification requirements that a person must
satisfy to perform either type of audit.
The bill also requires that all work involved in making or installing an energy
efficiency improvement or renewable resource application under an authorized
program must be performed by a contractor or subcontractor that the PSC has
included on a prequalification list of approved contractors and subcontractors. The
PSC may include a contractor or subcontractor on the list only if the PSC determines
that the contractor or subcontractor satisfies certain requirements, including the
following: 1) agrees to comply with prevailing wage and substance abuse prevention
requirements that apply to certain public works projects; 2) certifies that employees
are not improperly classified as independent contractors in violation of federal or
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 adoption recommended by committee on Jobs, the Economy and Small Business, Ayes 9, Noes 4
Passed 9–4 Mar 29, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Feb 17, 2010 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Mason, Soletski, Zigmunt, Grigsby, Molepske Jr., Fields, Young, Roys, Colon, Berceau, A. Williams, Zepnick and Toles;Cosponsored by Senator Holperin
- Feb 17, 2010 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Jobs, the Economy and Small Business
- Feb 24, 2010 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Mar 1, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Mason
- Mar 3, 2010 · Assembly
LRB correction (Assembly substitute amendment 1)
- Mar 10, 2010 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 16, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly substitute amendment 2 offered by Representative Mason
- Mar 17, 2010 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Mar 25, 2010 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 29, 2010 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Jobs, the Economy and Small Business, Ayes 8, Noes 5
- Mar 29, 2010 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Mar 29, 2010 · Assembly
Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 adoption recommended by committee on Jobs, the Economy and Small Business, Ayes 9, Noes 4
- Mar 31, 2010 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 1, 2010 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly substitute amendment 2 offered by Representatives Friske and M. Williams
- Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1