Skip to content

Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session

AB 755

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

allowing certain utilities to administer investment programs for energy efficiency improvements and renewable energy applications, creating requirements for political subdivision loans for similar improvements and applications, providing an exemption from emergency rule procedures, and granting rule-making authority.

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill allows the Public Service Commission (PSC) to authorize an electric,

natural gas, or water public utility (utility) to administer, fund, or provide

administrative services for a program for investing in energy efficiency

improvements and renewable resource applications at any type of premises served

by the utility. The bill defines "energy efficiency improvement" as an improvement

that reduces the usage of energy or increases the efficiency of energy usage at

premises, and the bill defines "renewable resource application" as the application of

specified renewable energy resources, such as, for example, solar or wind power, at

premises. The bill allows the PSC to authorize a program only upon application by

a utility and prohibits the PSC from requiring that utilities participate in such a

program. In addition, if the utility is an investor-owned electric or natural gas utility

(energy utility), the PSC may authorize a program only if the PSC finds the program

is cost-effective. The bill requires a utility for which the PSC authorizes a program

to file a tariff with the PSC that specifies the terms and conditions of utility and

nonutility service provided to customers at premises where energy efficiency

improvements or renewable resource applications are made under the program. A

tariff has no effect until approved by the PSC.

In addition, the bill specifies that premises are not eligible for an investment

under an authorized program unless an audit is performed that demonstrates that

an energy efficiency improvement or renewable resource application is

cost-effective, as specified in rules promulgated by the PSC. The rules may specify

criteria that include comparing the cost of an improvement or application to the

value of the premises. In addition, for an energy efficiency improvement, the rules

may specify criteria that include the energy savings resulting from the improvement

and the period of time required for the energy savings to equal the cost of the

improvement. In addition, the PSC must promulgate rules requiring the

performance of audit after an energy efficiency improvement or renewable resource

application is made or installed. The purpose of such a postaudit is to verify that the

improvement or application was made or installed. The bill requires the PSC to

promulgate rules specifying the certification requirements that a person must

satisfy to perform either type of audit.

The bill also requires that all work involved in making or installing an energy

efficiency improvement or renewable resource application under an authorized

program must be performed by a contractor or subcontractor that the PSC has

included on a prequalification list of approved contractors and subcontractors. The

PSC may include a contractor or subcontractor on the list only if the PSC determines

that the contractor or subcontractor satisfies certain requirements, including the

following: 1) agrees to comply with prevailing wage and substance abuse prevention

requirements that apply to certain public works projects; 2) certifies that employees

are not improperly classified as independent contractors in violation of federal or

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: A. Williams (D) , Berceau (D) , Colon (D) , Fields (D) , Grigsby (D) , Mason (D) , Molepske Jr. (D) , Roys (D) , Soletski (D) , Toles (D) , Young (D) , Zepnick (D) , Zigmunt (D)

1 cosponsors

Holperin (D)

Votes

Assembly: Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 adoption recommended by committee on Jobs, the Economy and Small Business, Ayes 9, Noes 4

Passed 9–4 Mar 29, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Feb 17, 2010 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Mason, Soletski, Zigmunt, Grigsby, Molepske Jr., Fields, Young, Roys, Colon, Berceau, A. Williams, Zepnick and Toles;Cosponsored by Senator Holperin

  2. Feb 17, 2010 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Jobs, the Economy and Small Business

  3. Feb 24, 2010 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Mar 1, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Mason

  5. Mar 3, 2010 · Assembly

    LRB correction (Assembly substitute amendment 1)

  6. Mar 10, 2010 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  7. Mar 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 2 offered by Representative Mason

  8. Mar 17, 2010 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  9. Mar 25, 2010 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  10. Mar 29, 2010 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Jobs, the Economy and Small Business, Ayes 8, Noes 5

  11. Mar 29, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  12. Mar 29, 2010 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 adoption recommended by committee on Jobs, the Economy and Small Business, Ayes 9, Noes 4

  13. Mar 31, 2010 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  14. Apr 1, 2010 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  15. Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly substitute amendment 2 offered by Representatives Friske and M. Williams

  16. Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1