Assembly Bill 768
Authorizing the Department of Commerce to designate two additional enterprise zones
Topics: Commerce, Department of, Industrial development, Municipality: Planning
Became law
The governor signed it on May 10, 2010. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Feb 23, 2010
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed 96 to 2
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed 30 to 3
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2009 Wisconsin Act 266
Latest entry in the official record, May 11, 2010: “Published 5-24-2010”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Under current law, the Department of Commerce (Commerce) may designate an area as an enterprise zone. Commerce must consider a number of factors related to the area prior to designating the area as an enterprise zone, including indicators of the area's economic need and whether designation as an enterprise zone would promote the retention of jobs in the area. A taxpayer who creates or retains jobs in an enterprise zone may claim certain credits against state income and franchise taxes. Commerce may designate no more than ten enterprise zones.
This bill permits Commerce to designate a total of 12 enterprise zones.
Who's behind it
11 representatives are its . All 11 are Democrats.
6 more lawmakers .
See all 17 names Hide the names
Authors (11)
- Terese Berceau · Democrat, Assembly
- Fred Clark · Democrat, Assembly
- Kristen Dexter · Democrat, Assembly
- Phil Garthwaite · Democrat, Assembly
- Steve Hilgenberg · Democrat, Assembly
- Kim Hixson · Democrat, Assembly
- Louis Molepske Jr. · Democrat, Assembly
- Sandy Pasch · Democrat, Assembly
- James Soletski · Democrat, Assembly
- Robert Turner · Democrat, Assembly
- Ted Zigmunt · Democrat, Assembly
Signed on in support (6)
- Spencer Coggs · Democrat, Senate
- Pat Kreitlow · Democrat, Senate
- Julie M. Lassa · Democrat, Senate
- Judy Robson · Democrat, Senate
- Dale Schultz · Republican, Senate
- Lena Taylor · Democrat, Senate
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 6 votes on this bill.
Assembly Committee on Jobs vote to recommend it
Passed, 10 to 0 · Mar 3, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Jobs, the Economy and Small Business, Ayes 10, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Joint Committee on Finance vote to recommend it
Passed, 15 to 0 · Apr 7, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 15, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote on an amendment
Failed, 47 to 51 · Apr 13, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Refused to table Assembly amendment 1, Ayes 47, Noes 51”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote to pass it
Passed, 96 to 2 · Apr 13, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 96, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate Committee on Economic Development vote to recommend it
Passed, 7 to 0 · Apr 19, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by committee on Economic Development, Ayes 7, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote to pass it
Passed, 30 to 3 · Apr 20, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 30, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
May 11, 2010
The new law was published.
-
May 10, 2010
The governor signed it. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 266.
-
May 6, 2010
Sent to the governor.
-
Apr 20, 2010
The Senate passed it too, 30 to 3.
-
Apr 20, 2010
1 more senator signed on in support.
-
Apr 19, 2010
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 7 to 0.
-
Apr 19, 2010
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Apr 14, 2010
Sent to the Senate Committee on Economic Development.
-
Apr 14, 2010
The Senate received it.
-
Apr 13, 2010
The Assembly passed it, 96 to 2.
-
Apr 13, 2010
“Placed on the calendar of 4-13-2010 following AB 706” (the official wording)
-
Apr 7, 2010
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Apr 7, 2010
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 15 to 0.
-
Mar 3, 2010
Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.
-
Mar 3, 2010
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 10 to 0.
-
Mar 2, 2010
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Feb 24, 2010
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Feb 23, 2010
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Jobs, the Economy and Small Business.
-
Feb 23, 2010
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Feb 23, 2010 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Garthwaite, Dexter, Berceau, Clark, Hilgenberg, Hixson, Pasch, Soletski, Molepske Jr., Turner and Zigmunt;Cosponsored by Senators Kreitlow, Coggs, Robson, Schultz and Taylor
- Feb 23, 2010 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Jobs, the Economy and Small Business
- Feb 24, 2010 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Mar 2, 2010 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 2, 2010 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Mar 3, 2010 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by committee on Jobs, the Economy and Small Business, Ayes 10, Noes 0
- Mar 3, 2010 · Assembly
Referred to joint committee on Finance
- Apr 7, 2010 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Apr 7, 2010 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 15, Noes 0
- Apr 7, 2010 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Apr 7, 2010 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 4-13-2010 by committee on Rules
- Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Suder
- Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly
Refused to table Assembly amendment 1, Ayes 47, Noes 51
- Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly
Placed on the calendar of 4-13-2010 following AB 706
- Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 rejected, Ayes 50, Noes 48
- Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 96, Noes 2
- Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 14, 2010 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Apr 14, 2010 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Economic Development
- Apr 19, 2010 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Apr 19, 2010 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Apr 19, 2010 · Senate
Report concurrence recommended by committee on Economic Development, Ayes 7, Noes 0
- Apr 19, 2010 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Apr 19, 2010 · Senate
Placed on calendar 4-20-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Apr 20, 2010 · Senate
Senator Lassa added as a cosponsor
- Apr 20, 2010 · Senate
Read a second time
- Apr 20, 2010 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Apr 20, 2010 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Apr 20, 2010 · Senate
Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 30, Noes 3
- Apr 20, 2010 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Received from Senate concurred in
- May 6, 2010 · Assembly
Report correctly enrolled
- May 6, 2010 · Assembly
Presented to the Governor on 5-6-2010
- May 10, 2010 · Assembly
Report approved by the Governor on 5-10-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 266
- May 11, 2010 · Assembly
Published 5-24-2010
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote