Skip to content

Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session

AB 769

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

evidentiary recordings of persons under the age of 18 engaging in sexually explicit conduct and attempt of certain sex crimes against children and providing penalties.

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, a district attorney must disclose to the defense, and permit

the defense to inspect, copy, or photograph, any physical evidence that the district

attorney intends to use as evidence against that defendant in a trial. Under this bill,

if the evidence is a recording of a child engaging in sexually explicit conduct, the

defense may inspect the recording only in a location maintained by the court or a law

enforcement agency, one of which must, under this bill, retain possession, custody,

and control of the recording and must provide the defense opportunity to examine,

inspect, and view the recording. The defense may receive a copy for limited purposes

only if a court finds that the defense has not had opportunity to examine, inspect, or

view the recording.

Under current law, a person who causes a person under the age of 18 to view

or listen to sexually explicit conduct is guilty of a felony if the viewing or listening

is for sexual arousal or gratification of the actor or for humiliating or degrading the

person under the age of 18. Also under current law, a person who communicates via

a computer with an individual whom the person believes is under 16 years old with

the intent to have sexual intercourse or sexual contact with an individual under 16

years old is guilty of a felony. This bill makes the attempt to do either of these crimes

a felony punishable as the completed crime would currently be punishable.

Because this bill creates a new crime or revises a penalty for an existing crime,

the Joint Review Committee on Criminal Penalties may be requested to prepare a

report concerning the proposed penalty and the costs or savings that are likely to

result if the bill is enacted.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Berceau (D) , Brooks (R) , Staskunas (D) , Suder (R)

2 cosponsors

Lassa (D) , Sullivan (D)

Votes

Assembly: Report passage recommended by committee on Criminal Justice, Ayes 9, Noes 1

Passed 9–1 Apr 6, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Assembly amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 72, Noes 25

Passed 72–25 Apr 15, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Report concurrence recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0

Passed 5–0 Apr 20, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Feb 23, 2010 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Staskunas, Berceau, Brooks and Suder;Cosponsored by Senators Lassa and Sullivan

  2. Feb 23, 2010 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Criminal Justice

  3. Mar 1, 2010 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Mar 2, 2010 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Mar 12, 2010 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Mar 18, 2010 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  7. Mar 19, 2010 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  8. Apr 1, 2010 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  9. Apr 6, 2010 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by committee on Criminal Justice, Ayes 9, Noes 1

  10. Apr 6, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  11. Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:40 A.M. on 4-15-2010 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22

  12. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  13. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representatives Kessler, Sherman, Colon, Young, A. Williams and Schneider

  14. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 72, Noes 25

  15. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  16. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  17. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  18. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  19. Apr 16, 2010 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  20. Apr 16, 2010 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing

  21. Apr 20, 2010 · Senate

    Report concurrence recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  22. Apr 20, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  23. Apr 28, 2010 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1