Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
evidentiary recordings of persons under the age of 18 engaging in sexually explicit conduct and attempt of certain sex crimes against children and providing penalties.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, a district attorney must disclose to the defense, and permit
the defense to inspect, copy, or photograph, any physical evidence that the district
attorney intends to use as evidence against that defendant in a trial. Under this bill,
if the evidence is a recording of a child engaging in sexually explicit conduct, the
defense may inspect the recording only in a location maintained by the court or a law
enforcement agency, one of which must, under this bill, retain possession, custody,
and control of the recording and must provide the defense opportunity to examine,
inspect, and view the recording. The defense may receive a copy for limited purposes
only if a court finds that the defense has not had opportunity to examine, inspect, or
view the recording.
Under current law, a person who causes a person under the age of 18 to view
or listen to sexually explicit conduct is guilty of a felony if the viewing or listening
is for sexual arousal or gratification of the actor or for humiliating or degrading the
person under the age of 18. Also under current law, a person who communicates via
a computer with an individual whom the person believes is under 16 years old with
the intent to have sexual intercourse or sexual contact with an individual under 16
years old is guilty of a felony. This bill makes the attempt to do either of these crimes
a felony punishable as the completed crime would currently be punishable.
Because this bill creates a new crime or revises a penalty for an existing crime,
the Joint Review Committee on Criminal Penalties may be requested to prepare a
report concerning the proposed penalty and the costs or savings that are likely to
result if the bill is enacted.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report passage recommended by committee on Criminal Justice, Ayes 9, Noes 1
Passed 9–1 Apr 6, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Assembly amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 72, Noes 25
Passed 72–25 Apr 15, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Report concurrence recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Apr 20, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Feb 23, 2010 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Staskunas, Berceau, Brooks and Suder;Cosponsored by Senators Lassa and Sullivan
- Feb 23, 2010 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Criminal Justice
- Mar 1, 2010 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 2, 2010 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 12, 2010 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 18, 2010 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Mar 19, 2010 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 1, 2010 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Apr 6, 2010 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by committee on Criminal Justice, Ayes 9, Noes 1
- Apr 6, 2010 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 11:40 A.M. on 4-15-2010 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representatives Kessler, Sherman, Colon, Young, A. Williams and Schneider
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 72, Noes 25
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 16, 2010 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Apr 16, 2010 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing
- Apr 20, 2010 · Senate
Report concurrence recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Apr 20, 2010 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Apr 28, 2010 · Senate
Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1