Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 779

Designation of a corporation to receive funding for electronic health information exchange, creation of a corporation, and making an appropriation

Topics: Corporation, Federal aid, Health Services, Department of: Health, United States: Health and Human Services, Department of

Became law

The governor signed it on May 11, 2010. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 25, 2010

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 97 to 1

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed 29 to 4

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2009 Wisconsin Act 274

Latest entry in the official record, May 13, 2010: “Published 5-25-2010”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, the federal Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH Act) regulates the exchange of health information electronically. The HITECH Act allows the secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to award grants to promote the exchange of health information electronically. A state may receive that grant itself or may designate a nonprofit corporation that meets certain criteria to apply for and receive the federal grants under the HITECH Act.

This bill allows the secretary of the Department of Health Services (DHS) to designate a nonprofit corporation as the entity to apply for and receive federal funding under the HITECH Act if the corporation meets all of the following criteria:

Read the full summary

1. A purpose of the corporation, as written in its articles of incorporation or bylaws, is to use information technology to improve health care quality and efficiency through the authorized and secure electronic exchange and use of health information.

2. Annually, the corporation reports to the secretary on statewide health information exchange and how exchange efforts are enabling meaningful use of certified electronic health record technology, as defined in federal law.

3. The corporation complies with the requirements to be a qualified state-designated entity and to receive a grant under the HITECH Act.

4. The corporation's governing structure and bylaws allow it to consult and consider recommendations from outside entities, as specified under the HITECH Act.

5. The board of directors of the corporation includes as members the state health officer, the state Medical Assistance program director, and one person whom the governor selects. The board's members also include, with the goal of balancing public and private health sector interests, at least one individual representing each of the following categories: health care providers, health insurers or health plans, employers who purchase or self-insure employee health care, health care consumers or consumer advocates, and higher education.

6. The corporation agrees to fulfill purposes related to development and maintenance of electronic health information exchange.

DHS may make payments to a corporation to support health information exchange if the secretary of DHS determines that the corporation meets the same conditions as a corporation that is designated as the entity to apply for and receive federal funding under the HITECH Act.

The bill allows the secretary of DHS to organize and maintain a corporation for purposes related to the development and maintenance of electronic health information exchange. If the secretary organizes the corporation, the secretary must appoint as initial members the same categories of individuals as are required for a corporation to be designated to apply for and receive funding under the HITECH Act.

Who's behind it

15 lawmakers are its ⁠. 11 are Democrats and 3 are Republicans. 1 has no party on record.

9 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 24 names

Authors (15)

Signed on in support (9)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There were 4 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Health and Healthcare Reform vote to recommend it

Passed, 11 to 0 · Mar 29, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Health and Healthcare Reform, Ayes 11, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Joint Committee on Finance vote to recommend it

Passed, 15 to 0 · Apr 9, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 15, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 97 to 1 · Apr 20, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 97, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 29 to 4 · Apr 22, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 29, Noes 4”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. May 13, 2010

    The new law was published.

  2. May 11, 2010

    The governor signed it. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 274.

  3. May 10, 2010

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Apr 22, 2010

    The Senate passed it too, 29 to 4.

  5. Apr 21, 2010

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Rural Issues, Biofuels, and Information Technology.

  6. Apr 21, 2010

    The Senate received it.

  7. Apr 20, 2010

    The Assembly passed it, 97 to 1.

  8. Apr 9, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  9. Apr 9, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 15 to 0.

  10. Mar 29, 2010

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  11. Mar 29, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 11 to 0.

  12. Mar 3, 2010

    The committee held a public hearing.

  13. Mar 1, 2010

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  14. Feb 25, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Health and Healthcare Reform.

  15. Feb 25, 2010

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 25, 2010 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Richards, Dexter, Pasch, Berceau, Turner, Molepske Jr., Vruwink, Suder, Seidel, Benedict, Grigsby, Shilling, Pocan, Stone and Rhoades;Cosponsored by Senators Kreitlow, Vinehout, Lehman, Risser, Lassa, Taylor, Plale, Darling and Wirch

  2. Feb 25, 2010 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Health and Healthcare Reform

  3. Mar 1, 2010 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Mar 3, 2010 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Mar 24, 2010 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Mar 29, 2010 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by committee on Health and Healthcare Reform, Ayes 11, Noes 0

  7. Mar 29, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to joint committee on Finance

  8. Apr 7, 2010 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  9. Apr 9, 2010 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 15, Noes 0

  10. Apr 9, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  11. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:12 A.M. on 4-20-2010 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 23

  12. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  13. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  14. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  15. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 97, Noes 1

  16. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  17. Apr 21, 2010 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  18. Apr 21, 2010 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rural Issues, Biofuels, and Information Technology

  19. Apr 22, 2010 · Senate

    Rules suspended to withdraw from committee on Rural Issues, Biofuels, and Information Technology and take up

  20. Apr 22, 2010 · Senate

    Read a second time

  21. Apr 22, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  22. Apr 22, 2010 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  23. Apr 22, 2010 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 29, Noes 4

  24. Apr 22, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  25. Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  26. Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled

  27. May 10, 2010 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 5-10-2010

  28. May 11, 2010 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 5-11-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 274

  29. May 13, 2010 · Assembly

    Published 5-25-2010

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote