Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 781

Remission of fees for veterans and their dependents enrolled in the University of Wisconsin System or in a technical college

Topics: Military training, Technical College System Board, Technical college, University of Wisconsin: Tuition, Veteran: Education

Passed the Assembly, then stopped

The Assembly passed it on Apr 20, 2010, but the Senate never voted on it. A bill has to ⁠. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 26, 2010

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Apr 20, 2010

  4. Senate vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The Senate never voted on it.

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to concur in pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Current law requires the Board of Regents of the UW System (Board of Regents) and each technical college district board (district board) to grant remission of academic fees to certain veterans who are residents of this state for veterans benefits purposes and to the spouse, unremarried surviving spouse, and children (dependents) of a veteran who was a resident of this state at the time of entry into service and who either: 1) while a resident of this state, died on active duty, died as the result of a service-connected disability, or died in the line of duty while on active or inactive duty for training purposes; or 2) incurred at least a 30 percent service-connected disability rating. In the case of a veteran enrolled in the UW System, "academic fees" includes nonresident tuition.

Current law requires the Board of Regents and each district board to grant full remission of academic fees charged for up to 128 credits or eight semesters, whichever is longer, less the amount of any academic fees paid under the federal Reserve Officer Training Corps (ROTC) Program, the federal Veterans Vocational Rehabilitation Act, or the federal Post-9/11 Veterans Educational Assistance Act of 2008, commonly referred to as the "New GI Bill."

Read the full summary

This bill requires the Board of Regents and each district board to grant full remission of academic fees charged for 128 credits or eight semesters, whichever is longer, less 50 percent of the number of credits or semesters for which the student received educational assistance under the federal ROTC Program, the federal Veterans Vocational Rehabilitation Act, or the federal New GI Bill. As such, if a student received 128 credits or eight semesters of educational assistance under those federal programs, the bill permits the student to receive full remission of academic fees charged for 64 credits or four semesters, whichever is longer.

Who's behind it

13 lawmakers are its ⁠. 11 are Democrats, 1 is a Independent and 1 is a Republican.

4 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 17 names

Authors (13)

Signed on in support (4)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Veterans and Military Affairs vote on an amendment

Passed, 9 to 0 · Mar 30, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Veterans and Military Affairs, Ayes 9, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 98 to 0 · Apr 20, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 98, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Apr 27, 2010

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  3. Apr 21, 2010

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Agriculture and Higher Education.

  4. Apr 21, 2010

    The Senate received it.

  5. Apr 20, 2010

    The Assembly passed it, 98 to 0.

  6. Apr 20, 2010

    The Assembly adopted it.

  7. Mar 30, 2010

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  8. Mar 30, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 9 to 0.

  9. Mar 23, 2010

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  10. Mar 2, 2010

    The committee held a public hearing.

  11. Mar 2, 2010

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  12. Feb 26, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Veterans and Military Affairs.

  13. Feb 26, 2010

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 26, 2010 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Hilgenberg, Turner, Hubler, Sinicki, Ziegelbauer, Lothian, Garthwaite, Pope-Roberts, Berceau, Smith, Soletski, Pasch and Young;Cosponsored by Senators Lehman, Holperin and Taylor

  2. Feb 26, 2010 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Veterans and Military Affairs

  3. Mar 2, 2010 · Assembly

    Representative Molepske Jr. added as a coauthor

  4. Mar 2, 2010 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Mar 23, 2010 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Mar 23, 2010 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  7. Mar 25, 2010 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  8. Mar 25, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by committee on Veterans and Military Affairs

  9. Mar 30, 2010 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Veterans and Military Affairs, Ayes 9, Noes 0

  10. Mar 30, 2010 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Veterans and Military Affairs, Ayes 9, Noes 0

  11. Mar 30, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to joint committee on Finance

  12. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended to withdraw from committee on Finance and take up

  13. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  14. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 1 adopted

  15. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  16. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  17. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 98, Noes 0

  18. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  19. Apr 21, 2010 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  20. Apr 21, 2010 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Agriculture and Higher Education

  21. Apr 27, 2010 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  22. Apr 28, 2010 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote