Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
encouraging the purchase of food produced in this state, creating goals and a preference in state procurement for food produced in this state, and creating a council.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Current law generally authorizes state agencies to contract for services under
certain circumstances. With some exceptions, orders or contracts must be awarded
to the lowest responsible bidder. This bill requires state entities, if their
expenditures on food are greater than $25,000 per fiscal year, to attempt to ensure
that, before 2020, of the total amount expended for food per fiscal year, at least 10
percent is spent on food products that are grown, processed, packaged, and
distributed in this state and to ensure that, beginning in 2020, of the total amount
expended for food per fiscal year, at least 20 percent is spent on food products that
are grown, processed, packaged, and distributed in this state. To accomplish these
goals, this bill creates an exception to the lowest responsible bidder requirement by
allowing state entities to accept a bid or proposal from a vendor selling local food
products that is no more than 10 percent higher than the apparent low bid or most
advantageous proposal.
This bill also creates a Local Food, Farms, and Jobs Council in the Department
of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection. It requires the council to undertake
various activities designed to increase the in-state purchase of food products that are
grown, processed, packaged, and distributed in this state. These activities include
encouraging entities that receive funding from this state and that spend more than
$25,000 per year on food for their students, residents, or clients to spend at least 10
percent of their food budgets on food grown, processed, packaged, and distributed in
this state.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Introduced by: Berceau (D) , Black (D) , Clark (D) , Danou (D) , Garthwaite (D) , Hilgenberg (D) , Hraychuck (D) , Jorgensen (D) , Mason (D) , Molepske Jr. (D) , Steinbrink (D) , Turner (D) , Vruwink (D) , Young (D)
Votes
Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Rural Economic Development, Ayes 8, Noes 2
Passed 8–2 Apr 16, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Feb 26, 2010 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Garthwaite, Danou, Berceau, Black, Clark, Hilgenberg, Hraychuck, Jorgensen, Mason, Molepske Jr., Steinbrink, Turner, Vruwink and Young;Cosponsored by Senators Wirch, Lassa, Schultz, Taylor and Hansen
- Feb 26, 2010 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Rural Economic Development
- Mar 2, 2010 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Mar 23, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Garthwaite
- Mar 23, 2010 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 7, 2010 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 7, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Garthwaite
- Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Apr 16, 2010 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Rural Economic Development, Ayes 8, Noes 2
- Apr 16, 2010 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Apr 16, 2010 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Rural Economic Development, Ayes 8, Noes 2
- Apr 16, 2010 · Assembly
Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Rural Economic Development, Ayes 8, Noes 2
- Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1