Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 785

An integrated crime alert network and making an appropriation

Topics: Crime and criminals, Justice, Department of, Police, Public employee, State agencies

Stopped before the full Assembly voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Assembly never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Mar 2, 2010

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Assembly never voted on it.

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Current law requires the Department of Justice (DOJ) to perform criminal investigations for crimes of statewide import and to provide information to all law enforcement officers within the state, to federal investigators, and to law enforcement agencies in other states. Current law requires DOJ to provide informational bulletins by mail or its telecommunications system.

This bill allows DOJ to create an additional informational network to provide information regarding known or suspected criminal activity, crime prevention, and missing or endangered persons to state agencies, law enforcement officers, and members of the private sector. Under the bill, DOJ may charge a fee to members of the private sector that opt to receive information from the network.

Who's behind it

8 lawmakers are its ⁠. 4 are Democrats and 4 are Republicans.

10 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 18 names

Authors (8)

Signed on in support (10)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Criminal Justice vote to recommend it

Passed, 10 to 0 · Apr 8, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Criminal Justice, Ayes 10, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Apr 8, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  3. Apr 8, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 10 to 0.

  4. Mar 18, 2010

    The committee held a public hearing.

  5. Mar 15, 2010

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  6. Mar 2, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Criminal Justice.

  7. Mar 2, 2010

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Mar 2, 2010 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Hraychuck, Bies, Jorgensen, Turner, Staskunas, Petrowski, Townsend and Honadel;Cosponsored by Senators Plale, Taylor, Lassa, Carpenter, Lehman, Lazich, Cowles, Hansen, Sullivan and Olsen

  2. Mar 2, 2010 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Criminal Justice

  3. Mar 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Mar 18, 2010 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Apr 1, 2010 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Apr 8, 2010 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by committee on Criminal Justice, Ayes 10, Noes 0

  7. Apr 8, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  8. Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote