Skip to content

Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session

AB 788

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

creating a sunset provision for the county tax levy rate limit.

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law and subject to a number of exceptions, no county may impose

an operating levy at an operating levy rate that exceeds 0.001 or the operating levy

rate in 1992, whichever is greater. "Operating levy" is defined as the county purpose

levy, less the debt levy, and "operating levy rate" is defined as the total levy rate

minus the debt levy rate.

A county may exceed the limit under current law if its board adopts a resolution

stating its wish to exceed the operating levy rate limit that is otherwise applicable

and if that resolution is approved by the electors of the county in a referendum. The

limit may also be exceeded if a county increases the services that it provides by

adding responsibility for providing a service transferred to the county by another

governmental unit.

Under this bill, the operating levy rate limit does not apply to any county levy

that is imposed after December 2009.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Berceau (D) , Hintz (D) , Shilling , Turner (D) , Ziegelbauer (I) , Zigmunt (D)

2 cosponsors

Clark (D) , Miller (D)

Votes

Assembly: Report passage recommended by committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 2

Passed 5–2 Apr 12, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Mar 2, 2010 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Hintz, Shilling, Berceau, Turner, Zigmunt and Ziegelbauer;Cosponsored by Senator Miller

  2. Mar 2, 2010 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Urban and Local Affairs

  3. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Representative Clark added as a coauthor

  4. Mar 23, 2010 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Mar 23, 2010 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  6. Apr 6, 2010 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  7. Apr 12, 2010 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 2

  8. Apr 12, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  9. Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1