Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 788

Creating a sunset provision for the county tax levy rate limit

Topics: County: Taxation, Sunset

Stopped before the full Assembly voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Assembly never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Mar 2, 2010

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Assembly never voted on it.

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law and subject to a number of exceptions, no county may impose an operating levy at an operating levy rate that exceeds 0.001 or the operating levy rate in 1992, whichever is greater. "Operating levy" is defined as the county purpose levy, less the debt levy, and "operating levy rate" is defined as the total levy rate minus the debt levy rate.

A county may exceed the limit under current law if its board adopts a resolution stating its wish to exceed the operating levy rate limit that is otherwise applicable and if that resolution is approved by the electors of the county in a referendum. The limit may also be exceeded if a county increases the services that it provides by adding responsibility for providing a service transferred to the county by another governmental unit.

Read the full summary

Under this bill, the operating levy rate limit does not apply to any county levy that is imposed after December 2009.

Who's behind it

6 lawmakers are its ⁠. 4 are Democrats and 1 is a Independent. 1 has no party on record.

2 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 8 names

Authors (6)

Signed on in support (2)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Urban and Local Affairs vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 2 · Apr 12, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Apr 12, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  3. Apr 12, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 2.

  4. Mar 23, 2010

    The committee held a public hearing.

  5. Mar 23, 2010

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  6. Mar 4, 2010

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  7. Mar 2, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Urban and Local Affairs.

  8. Mar 2, 2010

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Mar 2, 2010 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Hintz, Shilling, Berceau, Turner, Zigmunt and Ziegelbauer;Cosponsored by Senator Miller

  2. Mar 2, 2010 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Urban and Local Affairs

  3. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Representative Clark added as a coauthor

  4. Mar 23, 2010 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Mar 23, 2010 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  6. Apr 6, 2010 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  7. Apr 12, 2010 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 2

  8. Apr 12, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  9. Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote