Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
state contractual services and false claims submitted to state and local governments, requiring the exercise of rule-making authority, and providing penalties.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Currently, the Department of Administration (DOA) or any state agency to
which DOA delegates purchasing authority may contract for services if the services
can be performed more efficiently or economically by contract than by state
employees. This bill allows contracting for services if at least two of the following
three conditions are met: 1) The services may be performed more economically by
contract than by state employees; 2) When considering expertise, the services can be
performed more efficiently by contract than by use of current full-time state
positions; or 3) When considering timeliness, the services can be performed more
efficiently by contract than by state employees. If the estimated cost of the services
exceeds $25,000, DOA must solicit bids or competitive sealed proposals. Under
current law, DOA must provide notice of the solicitation and the notice may be
provided either by a class 2 notice or on an Internet site determined by DOA. Under
this bill the notice must provided on the Internet site determined by DOA and may
be posted as a class 2 notice.
Currently, under rules promulgated by DOA, certain persons aggrieved by a
solicitation for, or an award of, a contract have five days from the solicitation or
award to file a notice of intent to protest with the agency soliciting the services or
awarding the contract and ten days to serve that agency with the written protest.
This bill extends the time to file a notice of intent to protest to seven working days
and the time to file a protest to 12 working days and permits both to be done
electronically.
Under current law, if a state agency enters into or renews a contract for services
that involves an estimated expenditure of more than $25,000, the agency must
conduct either a uniform cost-benefit analysis, for a new contract, or a continued
appropriateness review, for a contract renewal. This bill requires a cost-benefit
analysis or continued appropriateness review to consider all relevant costs including
salaries and benefits, training requirements, liability insurance, overhead, facility
costs, and taxes. Under this bill, no cost-benefit analysis may be shown to any bidder
until a letter of intent to contract has been issued. This bill generally requires that,
if a contract is for more than $25,000, any expenditures of the contractor that exceed
the bid by more than 10 percent may be paid only if the secretary of administration
approves payment of the increased amount and submits to the Joint Committee on
Finance (JCF) his or her rationale for approval. In addition, this bill requires each
contracting agency to perform periodic audits on its cost-benefit analyses and
continued appropriateness reviews and on its subsequent contracts.
The bill requires the Division of Legal Services in DOA to develop standard
performance measures, as well as benchmark indicators, to evaluate services
performed by contract for a state agency and to determine what actions taken by the
contractor would result in the state agency recovering the expenditures it paid to the
contractor. The division also must promulgate rules on signing bonuses,
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Labor, Ayes 7, Noes 1
Passed 7–1 Mar 30, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 adoption recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 11, Noes 4
Passed 11–4 Apr 20, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Mar 2, 2010 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Jorgensen, Barca, Mason, Roys, Vruwink, Berceau, Cullen, Hilgenberg, Hixson, Milroy, Molepske Jr., Pasch, Pocan, Pope-Roberts, Sinicki, Smith, Turner, Zepnick and Grigsby;Cosponsored by Senators Lassa, Carpenter, Coggs, Darling, Hansen, Holperin, Kreitlow, Lehman, Risser, Taylor, Vinehout, Wirch and Ellis
- Mar 2, 2010 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Labor
- Mar 10, 2010 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 10, 2010 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 10, 2010 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 10, 2010 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 10, 2010 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Mar 23, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Jorgensen
- Mar 24, 2010 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Mar 30, 2010 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Labor, Ayes 5, Noes 3
- Mar 30, 2010 · Assembly
Referred to joint committee on Finance
- Mar 30, 2010 · Assembly
Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Labor, Ayes 7, Noes 1
- Apr 6, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly substitute amendment 2 offered by Representative Jorgensen
- Apr 19, 2010 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Apr 19, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly substitute amendment 2 offered by joint committee on Finance
- Apr 19, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 2 to Assembly substitute amendment 2 offered by joint committee on Finance
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 adoption recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 11, Noes 4
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 2 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 adoption recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 15, Noes 0
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 adoption recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 12, Noes 3
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 10, Noes 5
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1