Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 797

Apprentice contracts, the appointment and composition of the Wisconsin Apprenticeship Council, requiring the exercise of rule-making authority, and providing a penalty

Topics: Apprenticeship, Labor and Industry Review Commission, Workforce Development, Department of

Stopped before the full Assembly voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Assembly never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Mar 2, 2010

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Assembly never voted on it.

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Introduction Under current law, any person 16 years of age or over may enter into an indenture, which is a contract whereby the person (apprentice) is to receive from his or her employer, in consideration for the apprentice's services, instruction in any trade, craft, or business. This bill makes various changes relating to the formation and assignment of an apprentice contract, the related instruction that must be provided under an apprentice contract, the procedures for terminating an apprentice contract, and the penalties for nonperformance of an apprentice contract. The bill also makes certain changes relating to the appointment and composition of the Wisconsin Apprenticeship Council.

Apprentice contracts Formation of apprentice contract.

Read the full summary

Under current law, an apprentice may enter into an indenture with an employer or with an organization of employees, association of employers, or other similar responsible agency (organization). An indenture must contain the names of the parties; the date of birth of the apprentice;

a statement of the trade, craft, or business that the apprentice is to be taught and the time when the apprenticeship will begin and end; an agreement stating the number of hours to be spent in related instruction; an agreement as to the procedures, methods, or plans to be taught; and a statement of the compensation to be paid to the apprentice.

This bill defines or redefines certain terms relating to apprenticeships.

Specifically, the bill:

1. Replaces the term "indenture" with the term "apprentice contract" and specifies that an apprentice contract is between the apprentice, the Department of Workforce Development (DWD), and the sponsor of the apprenticeship program or an apprenticeship committee acting as the agent of the sponsor.

2. Replaces the term "organization" with the term "sponsor" and redefines that term to mean any employer, organization of employees, association of employers, committee, or other person operating an apprenticeship program and in whose name the apprenticeship program is approved by DWD.

3. Defines an "apprenticeship committee" as a joint apprenticeship committee, which consists of both employer and employee representatives, or a nonjoint apprenticeship committee, which consists only of employer representatives, designated by a sponsor to administer an apprenticeship program.

4. Defines an "apprenticeship program" as a program approved by DWD providing for the employment and training of apprentices in a trade, craft, or business that includes a plan containing all of the terms and conditions for the qualification, recruitment, selection, employment, and training of apprentices as required under the subchapter of the statutes relating to apprenticeship programs.

The bill also requires DWD to promulgate rules providing procedures for approving and rescinding approval of an apprenticeship program.

The bill also eliminates the statutory provisions specifying the provisions that must be included in an indenture and instead requires DWD to promulgate rules specifying the provisions that are required to be included in an apprentice contract.

Assignment of apprentice contract.

Current law requires an organization that has entered into an indenture, with the written consent of the other parties to the indenture and the written acceptance of the proposed employer of the apprentice, to assign the indenture to the proposed employer, who is then bound by the terms of the indenture. Similarly, current law permits an employer that has entered into an indenture, with the approval of DWD and the written consent of the other parties to the indenture, to assign the indenture to an organization, which, with the approval of DWD and the written consent of the apprentice, must reassign the indenture to another employer that agrees to perform the unperformed obligations of the indenture. Current law also permits an employer that has entered into an indenture, with the written consent of the other parties to the indenture and the approval of DWD, to assign the indenture to another employer, who must then perform the unperformed obligations of the indenture.

This bill requires a sponsor that is not the proposed employer of an apprentice, or an apprenticeship committee that is acting as the agent of a sponsor, with the written acceptance of the proposed employer of the apprentice, to assign an apprentice contract to the proposed employer, who is then bound by the terms of the apprentice contract. The bill also permits the sponsor or the apprenticeship committee that entered into an apprentice contract to reassign the apprentice contract to a different employer who agrees to perform the unperformed obligations of the apprentice contract.

Related instruction.

Current law requires an apprentice to receive not less than four hours per week of related instruction during the first two years of an apprenticeship, to receive a total of not less than 400 hours of related instruction if the apprenticeship is for longer than two years, and to be paid for no fewer than those hours of related instruction at the same rate per hour as the apprentice is paid for services performed. Current law, however, does not prohibit an agreement between the parties requiring the apprentice to take additional instruction on his or her own time in excess of those required hours of related instruction.

This bill requires a sponsor to provide for an apprentice not less than 144 hours per year of related instruction during the first two years of the apprenticeship, not less than a total of 400 hours of related instruction over the term of the apprenticeship if the apprenticeship is for longer than two years, and, if the apprentice is receiving classroom instruction, not less than four hours of related instruction or the equivalent during each week that the school providing the classroom instruction is in session. The bill also requires an employer to pay an apprentice for not less than the number of hours of related instruction required under the bill or under the apprentice contract, whichever is greater, at the same rate per hour as the employer pays the apprentice for services performed, but does not prohibit an agreement between the parties requiring the apprentice to take additional instruction on his or her own time in excess of the number of hours of related instruction required under the bill or under the apprentice contract, whichever is greater. In addition, the bill requires the provider of related instruction to submit reports on grades and attendance to DWD and the sponsor in accordance with standards set by DWD.

Termination of apprentice contract.

Under current law, DWD may declare an indenture to be at an end if after due notice and hearing it is proved at the hearing that any apprentice, employer, or organization that is a party to the indenture is unable to continue with the obligations under the indenture or has breached the indenture.

This bill permits DWD to terminate an apprentice contract if after due notice and investigation it is proved that any apprentice, employer, or sponsor that is a party to the apprentice contract is unable to continue with the obligations under the apprentice contract or has breached the apprentice contract. Under the bill, no hearing is required unless the apprentice, employer, or sponsor requests a hearing.

Nonperformance of apprentice contract.

Under current law, if either party to an indenture fails to perform any of the stipulations of the indenture, the nonperforming party may be required to forfeit not less than $1 nor more than $100.

This bill increases that penalty to not less than $100 nor more than $1,000 and applies that penalty to an apprentice, sponsor, or assignee employer that fails to perform any of the stipulations of an apprentice contract.

Wisconsin Apprenticeship Council Appointment and composition of Wisconsin Apprenticeship Council.

Under current law, there is created in DWD a Wisconsin Apprenticeship Council (council) whose members are appointed by the Labor and Industry Review Commission (LIRC). This bill requires the council to consist of nine representatives of employers, nine representatives of employees, one representative of the Technical College System (TCS), one representative of the Department of Public Instruction (DPI), two members who represent the public interest, and one permanent classified employee of DWD to serve as nonvoting chairperson of the council. The bill also requires the secretary of workforce development, rather than LIRC, to appoint the members of the council, except that the bill requires the representative of the TCS to be appointed by the director of the TCS and the representative of the DPI to be appointed by the state superintendent of public instruction. In addition, the bill requires all members of the council to be familiar with apprenticeable occupations.

Who's behind it

3 lawmakers are its ⁠. 2 are Democrats. 1 has no party on record.

1 more lawmaker ⁠.

See all 4 names

Authors (3)

Signed on in support (1)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Workforce Development vote to recommend it

Passed, 7 to 0 · Mar 30, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Workforce Development, Ayes 7, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Mar 30, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  3. Mar 30, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 7 to 0.

  4. Mar 25, 2010

    The committee held a public hearing.

  5. Mar 9, 2010

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  6. Mar 2, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Workforce Development.

  7. Mar 2, 2010

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Mar 2, 2010 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Toles and Sinicki, by request of Department of Workforce Development;Cosponsored by Senator Coggs

  2. Mar 2, 2010 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Workforce Development

  3. Mar 9, 2010 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Mar 25, 2010 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Mar 25, 2010 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Mar 30, 2010 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by committee on Workforce Development, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  7. Mar 30, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  8. Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:43 A.M. on 4-15-2010 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22

  9. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  10. Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote