Assembly Bill 808
Student achievement guarantee in education program contracts
Topics: Public Instruction, Department of, School: State aid
Became law
The governor signed it on May 13, 2010. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Mar 4, 2010
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Apr 15, 2010
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Apr 22, 2010
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2009 Wisconsin Act 301
Latest entry in the official record, May 13, 2010: “Published 5-26-2010”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Current law allows an eligible school board that has entered into a five-year renewable student achievement guarantee (SAGE) contract with the Department of Public Instruction (DPI) to reduce class size to 15 pupils in grades kindergarten to three in schools with specified low-income enrollment to receive $2,250 for each low-income pupil enrolled in grades eligible for SAGE funding. Current law permits a school to renew and receive payments under a renewed SAGE contract if the school board maintains the reduced class size achieved during the last school year of the original SAGE contract for the grades specified for the last school year of the contract. Current law also permits DPI to waive requirements of the SAGE program in a contract entered into between DPI and a school board.
This bill changes the requirement that a school board maintain the reduced class size achieved during the last school year of the original SAGE contract as a condition for receiving payments under an existing SAGE contract, and permits a school board operating under an existing SAGE contract to do each of the following:
Read the full summary Show less
1) satisfy the class size requirement by reducing the class size to no more than 18 pupils; and 2) combine two classes with two classroom teachers to achieve a total class size of 30 pupils.
The bill also authorizes a school board, in the 2010-11 school year, to enter into a new, renewable, five-year SAGE contract with DPI to reduce class size to 18 pupils in grades kindergarten to three in one or more schools in the school district if, in the previous school year, at least one school in the school district had an enrollment of at least 50 percent low income and all of the following are satisfied:
1. In the previous school year, the school had an enrollment that was at least 30 percent low income.
2. The school is not receiving a grant from DPI for a preschool to grade five program.
3. The school is not already a beneficiary of a SAGE contract.
The school board may combine two classes with two classroom teachers to achieve a total class size of 30 pupils.
Finally, under the bill, DPI may not waive any requirement of the SAGE program in any SAGE contract entered into or renewed after the effective date of the bill.
Who's behind it
11 lawmakers are its . All 11 are Democrats.
6 more lawmakers .
See all 17 names Hide the names
Authors (11)
- Terese Berceau · Democrat, Assembly
- Fred Clark · Democrat, Assembly
- Chris Danou · Democrat, Assembly
- Kristen Dexter · Democrat, Assembly
- Phil Garthwaite · Democrat, Assembly
- Steve Hilgenberg · Democrat, Assembly
- Ann Hraychuck · Democrat, Assembly
- Louis Molepske Jr. · Democrat, Assembly
- Sandy Pasch · Democrat, Assembly
- Sondy Pope · Democrat, Assembly
- Jeff Smith · Democrat, Senate
Signed on in support (6)
- Jim Holperin · Democrat, Senate
- Pat Kreitlow · Democrat, Senate
- Julie M. Lassa · Democrat, Senate
- John Lehman · Democrat, Senate
- Luther S. Olsen · Republican, Senate
- Kathleen Vinehout · Democrat, Senate
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 3 votes on this bill.
Assembly Committee on Education vote to recommend it
Passed, 8 to 4 · Mar 31, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 8, Noes 4”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote on an amendment
Passed, 52 to 45 · Apr 15, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Assembly amendment 2 laid on table, Ayes 52, Noes 45”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote to pass it
Passed, 68 to 29 · Apr 15, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 68, Noes 29”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
May 13, 2010
The new law was published.
-
May 13, 2010
The governor signed it. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 301.
-
May 11, 2010
Sent to the governor.
-
Apr 22, 2010
The Senate passed it too.
-
Apr 22, 2010
1 more senator signed on in support.
-
Apr 16, 2010
Sent to the Senate Committee on Education.
-
Apr 16, 2010
The Senate received it.
-
Apr 15, 2010
The Assembly passed it, 68 to 29.
-
Apr 15, 2010
The Assembly adopted it.
-
Mar 31, 2010
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Mar 31, 2010
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 8 to 4.
-
Mar 22, 2010
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Mar 9, 2010
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Mar 4, 2010
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Education.
-
Mar 4, 2010
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Dexter, Hilgenberg, Garthwaite, Danou, Berceau, Clark, Hraychuck, Molepske Jr., Pasch, Pope-Roberts and Smith;Cosponsored by Senators Holperin, Kreitlow, Olsen, Vinehout and Lehman
- Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Education
- Mar 9, 2010 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Mar 22, 2010 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 23, 2010 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Mar 31, 2010 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 8, Noes 4
- Mar 31, 2010 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 11:45 A.M. on 4-15-2010 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Dexter
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 adopted
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representative Kaufert
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 2 laid on table, Ayes 52, Noes 45
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 68, Noes 29
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 16, 2010 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Apr 16, 2010 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Education
- Apr 22, 2010 · Senate
Senator Lassa added as a cosponsor
- Apr 22, 2010 · Senate
Rules suspended to withdraw from committee on Education and take up
- Apr 22, 2010 · Senate
Read a second time
- Apr 22, 2010 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Apr 22, 2010 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Apr 22, 2010 · Senate
Read a third time and concurred in
- Apr 22, 2010 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly
Received from Senate concurred in
- Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly
Report correctly enrolled
- May 11, 2010 · Assembly
Presented to the Governor on 5-11-2010
- May 13, 2010 · Assembly
Report approved by the Governor on 5-12-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 301
- May 13, 2010 · Assembly
Published 5-26-2010
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote