Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
student achievement guarantee in education program contracts.
- Introduced, completed
- Passes Assembly, completed
- Passes Senate, completed
- Governor signs, completed
- Law, completed
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Current law allows an eligible school board that has entered into a five-year
renewable student achievement guarantee (SAGE) contract with the Department of
Public Instruction (DPI) to reduce class size to 15 pupils in grades kindergarten to
three in schools with specified low-income enrollment to receive $2,250 for each
low-income pupil enrolled in grades eligible for SAGE funding. Current law permits
a school to renew and receive payments under a renewed SAGE contract if the school
board maintains the reduced class size achieved during the last school year of the
original SAGE contract for the grades specified for the last school year of the
contract. Current law also permits DPI to waive requirements of the SAGE program
in a contract entered into between DPI and a school board.
This bill changes the requirement that a school board maintain the reduced
class size achieved during the last school year of the original SAGE contract as a
condition for receiving payments under an existing SAGE contract, and permits a
school board operating under an existing SAGE contract to do each of the following:
1) satisfy the class size requirement by reducing the class size to no more than 18
pupils; and 2) combine two classes with two classroom teachers to achieve a total
class size of 30 pupils.
The bill also authorizes a school board, in the 2010-11 school year, to enter into
a new, renewable, five-year SAGE contract with DPI to reduce class size to 18 pupils
in grades kindergarten to three in one or more schools in the school district if, in the
previous school year, at least one school in the school district had an enrollment of
at least 50 percent low income and all of the following are satisfied:
1. In the previous school year, the school had an enrollment that was at least
30 percent low income.
2. The school is not receiving a grant from DPI for a preschool to grade five
program.
3. The school is not already a beneficiary of a SAGE contract.
The school board may combine two classes with two classroom teachers to
achieve a total class size of 30 pupils.
Finally, under the bill, DPI may not waive any requirement of the SAGE
program in any SAGE contract entered into or renewed after the effective date of the
bill.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Introduced by: Berceau (D) , Clark (D) , Danou (D) , Dexter (D) , Garthwaite (D) , Hilgenberg (D) , Hraychuck (D) , Molepske Jr. (D) , Pasch (D) , Pope-Roberts (D) , Smith (D)
Votes
Assembly: Report passage recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 8, Noes 4
Passed 8–4 Mar 31, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Assembly amendment 2 laid on table, Ayes 52, Noes 45
Passed 52–45 Apr 15, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Read a third time and passed, Ayes 68, Noes 29
Passed 68–29 Apr 15, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Dexter, Hilgenberg, Garthwaite, Danou, Berceau, Clark, Hraychuck, Molepske Jr., Pasch, Pope-Roberts and Smith;Cosponsored by Senators Holperin, Kreitlow, Olsen, Vinehout and Lehman
- Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Education
- Mar 9, 2010 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Mar 22, 2010 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 23, 2010 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Mar 31, 2010 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 8, Noes 4
- Mar 31, 2010 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 11:45 A.M. on 4-15-2010 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 adopted
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representative Kaufert
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 2 laid on table, Ayes 52, Noes 45
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 68, Noes 29
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Dexter
- Apr 16, 2010 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Apr 16, 2010 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Education
- Apr 22, 2010 · Senate
Senator Lassa added as a cosponsor
- Apr 22, 2010 · Senate
Rules suspended to withdraw from committee on Education and take up
- Apr 22, 2010 · Senate
Read a second time
- Apr 22, 2010 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Apr 22, 2010 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Apr 22, 2010 · Senate
Read a third time and concurred in
- Apr 22, 2010 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly
Received from Senate concurred in
- Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly
Report correctly enrolled
- May 11, 2010 · Assembly
Presented to the Governor on 5-11-2010
- May 13, 2010 · Assembly
Report approved by the Governor on 5-12-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 301
- May 13, 2010 · Assembly
Published 5-26-2010