Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 809

Transportation of private school pupils

Topics: Parochial and private educational institutions, School: Conveyance of pupil

Passed the Assembly, then stopped

The Assembly passed it on Apr 15, 2010, but the Senate never voted on it. A bill has to ⁠. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Mar 4, 2010

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Apr 15, 2010

  4. Senate vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The Senate never voted on it.

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to concur in pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Current law, with some exceptions, requires a school district to provide transportation to and from school for a pupil attending a private school that is located at least two miles from the pupil's residence.

This bill requires a school district to provide transportation for private school pupils only during the school term of the school district. A school term is the time beginning on the first school day and ending on the last school day that the schools of a school district are in operation for the attendance of pupils in a school year, excluding summer classes.

Read the full summary

Under current law, if the estimated cost of transporting a pupil to a private school is more than 1.5 times the school district's average cost per pupil for bus transportation, the school board may fulfill its obligation to transport the pupil by contracting with the pupil's parent or guardian. Except as provided below, the contract must provide for an annual payment for each pupil of at least $5 times the number of miles between the pupil's residence and the private school, or the school district's average cost per pupil for bus transportation, whichever is greater.

In a first class city school district (currently, only the Milwaukee Public Schools), if two or more pupils reside in the same household and attend the same private school, the contract may, at the discretion of the school board, provide for a total annual payment of the amount described above for all of the pupils instead of for each of the pupils. This bill extends this provision to all school districts.

Currently, annually by May 15 each private school must notify each school board of the names, grade levels, and locations of all pupils eligible to be transported by the school board during the succeeding school term. This bill changes the notification date to July 15.

Who's behind it

12 lawmakers are its ⁠. All 12 are Democrats.

3 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 15 names

Authors (12)

Signed on in support (3)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Education vote on an amendment

Passed, 9 to 3 · Mar 31, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 9, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Apr 16, 2010

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Education.

  3. Apr 16, 2010

    The Senate received it.

  4. Apr 15, 2010

    The Assembly passed it.

  5. Apr 15, 2010

    The Assembly adopted it.

  6. Mar 31, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  7. Mar 31, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 8 to 4.

  8. Mar 18, 2010

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  9. Mar 9, 2010

    The committee held a public hearing.

  10. Mar 4, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Education.

  11. Mar 4, 2010

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Dexter, Danou, Clark, Garthwaite, Hilgenberg, Hraychuck, Pope-Roberts, Roys, Sinicki, Smith, Staskunas and Zigmunt;Cosponsored by Senators Kreitlow, Vinehout and Holperin

  2. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Education

  3. Mar 9, 2010 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Mar 18, 2010 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Mar 19, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Dexter

  6. Mar 23, 2010 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  7. Mar 31, 2010 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 9, Noes 3

  8. Mar 31, 2010 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 8, Noes 4

  9. Mar 31, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  10. Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:46 A.M. on 4-15-2010 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22

  11. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  12. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 adopted

  13. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  14. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  15. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  16. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  17. Apr 16, 2010 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  18. Apr 16, 2010 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Education

  19. Apr 28, 2010 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote