Skip to content

Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session

AB 81

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

changing the procedures for filling vacant civil service positions in the city of Milwaukee.

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, a first class city (presently only Milwaukee) is required to

have a civil service commission (commission). Among the commission's duties is the

responsibility to oversee the civil service examinations given by the city and to keep

lists of eligible persons who take the examinations for civil service positions in the

city. In general, if a vacancy occurs in a nonmanagement civil service position and

if the appointing authority chooses not to fill the vacant position by reinstatement,

promotion, or reduction, the commission is required to certify to the appointing

authority from the list of eligible candidates the three persons ranked highest on the

list, based on examination scores and other requirements established by the

commission, and up to three veterans or spouses of veterans whose grade, plus

veterans preference points, is equal to or higher than the lowest grade on the list of

eligibles. Similarly, if the vacancy occurs in a civil service position that is

managerial, supervisory, or confidential, the commission currently certifies to the

appointing authority the five persons ranked highest on the list or, if the list of

eligible candidates is more than 50, the top 10 percent ranked highest on the list up

to a maximum of ten. A similar number of veterans or spouses of veterans is also

certified under the same procedures that are used for a nonmanagement civil service

position.

Under this bill, for vacancies in all civil service positions, the commission may

certify to the appointing authority any number of eligible candidates ranked highest

on the list, based on rules established by the commission. Also under the bill, all

persons on the list with the same test score must be included on the same

certification.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: A. Williams (D) , Fields (D) , Richards (D) , Sinicki (D) , Toles (D) , Turner (D) , Young (D) , Zepnick (D)

2 cosponsors

Plale (D) , Taylor (D)

Votes

Assembly: Report passage recommended by committee on Labor, Ayes 8, Noes 0

Passed 8–0 Apr 23, 2009 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Feb 24, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Sinicki, Richards, Toles, Fields, A. Williams, Young, Zepnick and Turner;Cosponsored by Senators Taylor and Plale

  2. Feb 24, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Labor

  3. Mar 6, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Mar 9, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Mar 18, 2009 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  6. Apr 16, 2009 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  7. Apr 23, 2009 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by committee on Labor, Ayes 8, Noes 0

  8. Apr 23, 2009 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  9. Apr 23, 2009 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 4-28-2009 by committee on Rules

  10. Apr 28, 2009 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  11. Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1