Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
changing the procedures for filling vacant civil service positions in the city of Milwaukee.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, a first class city (presently only Milwaukee) is required to
have a civil service commission (commission). Among the commission's duties is the
responsibility to oversee the civil service examinations given by the city and to keep
lists of eligible persons who take the examinations for civil service positions in the
city. In general, if a vacancy occurs in a nonmanagement civil service position and
if the appointing authority chooses not to fill the vacant position by reinstatement,
promotion, or reduction, the commission is required to certify to the appointing
authority from the list of eligible candidates the three persons ranked highest on the
list, based on examination scores and other requirements established by the
commission, and up to three veterans or spouses of veterans whose grade, plus
veterans preference points, is equal to or higher than the lowest grade on the list of
eligibles. Similarly, if the vacancy occurs in a civil service position that is
managerial, supervisory, or confidential, the commission currently certifies to the
appointing authority the five persons ranked highest on the list or, if the list of
eligible candidates is more than 50, the top 10 percent ranked highest on the list up
to a maximum of ten. A similar number of veterans or spouses of veterans is also
certified under the same procedures that are used for a nonmanagement civil service
position.
Under this bill, for vacancies in all civil service positions, the commission may
certify to the appointing authority any number of eligible candidates ranked highest
on the list, based on rules established by the commission. Also under the bill, all
persons on the list with the same test score must be included on the same
certification.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report passage recommended by committee on Labor, Ayes 8, Noes 0
Passed 8–0 Apr 23, 2009 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Feb 24, 2009 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Sinicki, Richards, Toles, Fields, A. Williams, Young, Zepnick and Turner;Cosponsored by Senators Taylor and Plale
- Feb 24, 2009 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Labor
- Mar 6, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 9, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 18, 2009 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Apr 16, 2009 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Apr 23, 2009 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by committee on Labor, Ayes 8, Noes 0
- Apr 23, 2009 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Apr 23, 2009 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 4-28-2009 by committee on Rules
- Apr 28, 2009 · Assembly
Laid on the table
- Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1