Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 810

Creating a privilege for communications to veteran mentors

Topics: Circuit court, National Guard, Privacy, Veteran

Stopped before the full Assembly voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Assembly never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Mar 4, 2010

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Assembly never voted on it.

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, a communication between certain persons, such as between spouses, between a lawyer and client, and between a patient and a physician, is considered privileged and may not be disclosed without permission of the person who made the communication. The spouse, client, or patient may prevent the disclosure of the privileged communication, with certain exceptions.

This bill creates a privilege against disclosure of a communication made between a veteran or a member of the armed forces or national guard and a veteran mentor. A veteran mentor is a veteran who is authorized by a circuit court judge to provide assistance and advice to a veteran or a member of the armed forces or national guard regarding court-related matters. To be a veteran mentor, the person must have completed a judicially approved veterans mentoring training program and completed a background information form approved by a circuit court. The privilege does not apply to communications that the veteran has agreed in writing to allow to be disclosed as a condition of his or her participation in the veterans mentoring program.

Who's behind it

7 lawmakers are its ⁠. 5 are Democrats and 1 is a Republican. 1 has no party on record.

3 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 10 names

Authors (7)

Signed on in support (3)

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Judiciary and Ethics vote to recommend it

Passed, 8 to 0 · Mar 11, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Judiciary and Ethics, Ayes 8, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Mar 11, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  3. Mar 11, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 8 to 0.

  4. Mar 9, 2010

    The committee held a public hearing.

  5. Mar 5, 2010

    1 more senator signed on in support.

  6. Mar 4, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Judiciary and Ethics.

  7. Mar 4, 2010

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Shilling, Turner, Hilgenberg, Milroy, Molepske Jr., Sinicki and Suder;Cosponsored by Senators Taylor and Kreitlow

  2. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary and Ethics

  3. Mar 5, 2010 · Assembly

    Senator Lassa added as a cosponsor

  4. Mar 9, 2010 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Mar 9, 2010 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Mar 11, 2010 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by committee on Judiciary and Ethics, Ayes 8, Noes 0

  7. Mar 11, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  8. Mar 11, 2010 · Assembly

    LRB correction

  9. Apr 7, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Shilling

  10. Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:47 A.M. on 4-15-2010 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22

  11. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  12. Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote