Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 811

Suitability of annuity contracts and granting rule-making authority

Topics: Insurance, Insurance: Commissioner, Office of

Stopped before the full Assembly voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Assembly never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Mar 5, 2010

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Assembly never voted on it.

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, an insurance intermediary (intermediary), or insurer if no intermediary is involved, may not recommend to a consumer the purchase of an annuity, or recommend to a consumer the exchange of an annuity that results in an insurance transaction, unless the intermediary or insurer has reasonable grounds to believe that the recommendation is suitable for the consumer based on facts disclosed by the consumer as to his or her investments, other insurance products, and financial situation and needs. Before making a recommendation, the intermediary or insurer must make reasonable efforts to obtain information from the consumer about his or her financial status, tax status, and investment objectives. Current law requires insurers to have a system for supervising annuity transaction recommendations and provides certain requirements with which the supervisory system must comply. The commissioner of insurance (commissioner) may order an insurer or intermediary to take corrective action if a consumer is harmed by a violation of the provisions regulating annuity transaction recommendations, and the commissioner may promulgate rules to reduce or eliminate penalties for violations of the provisions if, after a violation is discovered, corrective action is promptly taken for the consumer.

This bill makes various changes to the annuity transaction provisions. The bill adds types of information that an insurer or insurance intermediary must consider when determining whether a recommendation to a consumer for the purchase, exchange, or replacement of an annuity is suitable (suitability information), such as the consumer's risk tolerance, liquidity needs, intended use of the annuity, and financial time horizon. In addition, the bill requires that the consumer have been reasonably informed of various specified features of the annuity; that the consumer would benefit from certain features of the annuity, such as tax-deferred growth; that the annuity as a whole is suitable; and that, in the case of an exchange or replacement, the transaction as a whole is suitable for the particular consumer, including taking into account such things as whether the consumer will incur a surrender charge or be subject to increased fees. While the intermediary or insurer must still make reasonable efforts to obtain the consumer's suitability information before making a recommendation, an insurer is prohibited from issuing an annuity that is recommended unless it is reasonable to believe that the annuity is suitable, based on the consumer's suitability information. The bill requires an intermediary or insurer, at the time of a sale, to make a record of any recommendation that was made; to obtain the consumer's signature that he or she refused to provide suitability information, if that is the case; and to obtain a signed statement from the consumer that the consumer is entering into an annuity transaction that was not recommended by the insurer or intermediary, if that is the case. The bill prohibits an intermediary from dissuading, or attempting to dissuade, a consumer from truthfully responding to a request for confirmation of suitability information or from filing a complaint or from cooperating with the investigation of a complaint.

Read the full summary

The bill expands on what is required for an insurer's system for supervising annuity transaction recommendations. Under the bill, an insurer must maintain reasonable procedures to inform intermediaries of the statutory requirements for annuity transactions, including incorporating the requirements into training manuals; establish standards for requiring intermediaries to comply with training requirements; provide intermediaries with product-specific training; maintain procedures for reviewing each recommendation before the issuance of an annuity to ensure that there is a reasonable basis to determine that a recommendation is suitable; and maintain reasonable procedures to detect recommendations that are not suitable.

The bill prohibits an intermediary from soliciting the sale of an annuity product unless the intermediary has adequate knowledge of the product to recommend it and establishes intermediary training requirements related to selling annuities. An intermediary who sells annuity products must complete a one-time training course that qualifies for at least four continuing education credits and that includes information on such topics as the types and classifications of annuities; how fixed, variable, and indexed annuity contract provisions affect consumers; taxation of annuities; appropriate sales practices; and disclosure requirements. Both the course and course provider, which must be registered as a continuing education provider in this state, must be approved by the commissioner. An insurer must verify that an intermediary has completed the course before allowing the intermediary to sell an annuity product for the insurer.

Under the bill, the commissioner retains the authority to promulgate rules to reduce or eliminate penalties for violations of the provisions if corrective action is promptly taken for the consumer. In addition, the commissioner may reduce or eliminate a penalty if the violation is not a part of a pattern or practice.

Who's behind it

4 representatives are its ⁠. All 4 are Democrats.

1 more lawmaker ⁠.

See all 5 names

Authors (4)

Signed on in support (1)

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Insurance vote on an amendment

Passed, 10 to 0 · Apr 14, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Insurance, Ayes 10, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Apr 14, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  3. Apr 14, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 9 to 1.

  4. Mar 11, 2010

    The committee held a public hearing.

  5. Mar 5, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Insurance.

  6. Mar 5, 2010

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Mar 5, 2010 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Cullen, Molepske Jr., Turner and A. Williams;Cosponsored by Senator Wirch

  2. Mar 5, 2010 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Insurance

  3. Mar 11, 2010 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Apr 6, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representatives Nygren and Cullen

  5. Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Apr 14, 2010 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Insurance, Ayes 10, Noes 0

  7. Apr 14, 2010 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Insurance, Ayes 9, Noes 1

  8. Apr 14, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  9. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:15 A.M. on 4-20-2010 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 23

  10. Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote