Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 815

Physical examinations and discovery of patients' records in civil actions

Topics: Court: Procedure, Damage (personal injury), Mental health, Privacy

Stopped in committee

It had a but no committee vote, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Mar 9, 2010

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. It had a hearing but no committee vote.

  3. Assembly vote, not reached

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It sat with the Assembly Committee on Judiciary and Ethics.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill makes changes to the scope of, and procedure for, discovery in civil cases where the mental or physical condition of a party is in issue. Under current law, if a claimant raises an issue involving his or her mental or physical condition, the court may, upon a motion and notice from the defending party, order the claimant to undergo a physical, mental, or vocational examination. Under current law, the court order specifies the time, place, manner, conditions, and scope of the examination.

Current law requires the court to order a claimant who seeks damages for personal injuries to give the defending party, and any physician named in the order, permission to inspect the claimant's X-rays and hospital or medical records and reports, unless the X-rays, records, or reports are beyond the scope of general discovery in the case. Under current law, the defending party must give a copy of any report he or she receives from the person who conducted the examination of the claimant or the inspection of the claimant's X-rays, records, or reports to the claimant. If the defending party does not give a copy of the report to the claimant within ten days after he or she receives it, the defending party may not introduce at trial any evidence that the defending party obtained from the examination or inspection.

Read the full summary

Under this bill, if a claimant raises an issue involving his or her mental or physical condition, the court may order the claimant to undergo one physical, mental, or vocational examination, unless the defending party shows good cause for the claimant to undergo more than one examination. Under the bill, the order for the examination must do all of the following: 1) specify the time, place, manner, conditions, and scope of the examination, and identify who will conduct the examination; 2) prohibit the person who is conducting the examination from inquiring into any issue relating to liability in the underlying action; 3) allow the claimant to record the examination electronically and have one or more witnesses present at the examination; 4) require the examination to be conducted within 100 miles of where the claimant lives, is employed, or transacts business, 5) require the defending party to pay the claimant's expenses relating to the examination, including travel expenses, child care expenses, and a minimum of $30 per hour.

Under the bill, if a claimant seeks damages for personal injuries, a court may order the claimant to give the defending party, and any physician named in the order, permission to inspect any X-rays or hospital or medical records and reports that were taken in the course of diagnosing or treating the injuries for which the claimant seeks damages. If the defending party seeks additional discovery, the bill requires the defending party to prove, by clear, satisfactory, and convincing evidence to a reasonable certainty, that the additional discovery is essential to the defense relating to the cause of the claimant's injuries and that the discovery relates to a pre-existing condition that is at least substantially similar to the injuries for which the claimant seeks damages.

Under the bill, the defending party must give a copy of any report that is made pursuant to an examination or inspection within 15 days after the examination or inspection takes place to the claimant. If a defending party fails to do so, the defending party may not introduce at trial any evidence that the defending party obtained from the examination or inspection. Under the bill, a claimant may introduce evidence obtained from the examination or inspection, regardless of whether the defending party seeks to introduce the evidence.

Who's behind it

6 representatives are its ⁠. All 6 are Democrats.

1 more lawmaker ⁠.

See all 7 names

Authors (6)

Signed on in support (1)

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Apr 6, 2010

    The committee held a public hearing.

  3. Mar 9, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Judiciary and Ethics.

  4. Mar 9, 2010

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Mar 9, 2010 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Richards, Pasch, Turner, Soletski, Pope-Roberts and A. Williams;Cosponsored by Senator Sullivan

  2. Mar 9, 2010 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary and Ethics

  3. Apr 6, 2010 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Apr 7, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Richards

  5. Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor