Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
comprehensive planning.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under the current law commonly known as the "Smart Growth" statute, if a
city, village, town, county, or regional planning commission (local governmental unit)
creates a development plan or master plan (comprehensive plan) or amends an
existing comprehensive plan, the plan must contain certain planning elements. A
town may create a comprehensive plan only if it exercises village powers as
authorized by the town meeting. The required planning elements include the
following: housing; transportation; utilities and community facilities; agricultural,
natural, and cultural resources; economic development; land use; and
intergovernmental cooperation.
Also under current law, beginning on January 1, 2010, certain actions of a local
governmental unit that affect land use must be consistent with that local
governmental unit's comprehensive plan. The actions to which this requirement
applies are official mapping, local subdivision regulation, and zoning ordinances,
including zoning of shorelands or wetlands in shorelands. Also under current law,
beginning on January 1, 2010, if a local governmental unit engages in any of these
specified actions, the comprehensive plan must contain at least all of the required
planning elements.
This bill specifies that the actions of a local governmental unit that must be
consistent with the local governmental unit's comprehensive plan are ordinances
related to official mapping, local subdivision regulation, and zoning, including
zoning of shorelands or wetlands in shorelands. "Consistent with" is defined in this
bill to mean "furthers or does not contradict the objectives, goals, and policies
contained in the comprehensive plan." This bill also specifies that enacting a
comprehensive plan by ordinance does not make the comprehensive plan itself a
regulation.
Also under this bill, if a local governmental unit has not adopted a
comprehensive plan, it may be exempt from the consistency requirement if either:
1) the local governmental unit has not received a comprehensive planning grant from
the Department of Administration (DOA), and the local governmental unit adopts
a resolution stating that it will adopt a comprehensive plan by January 1, 2012; or
2) the local governmental unit has received a comprehensive planning grant and an
extension from DOA. The local governmental unit is exempt from the consistency
requirement until January 1, 2012, if it qualifies under the former provision or until
the expiration of the extension granted by DOA if it qualifies under the latter
provision.
Also under this bill, a town may adopt a comprehensive plan whether or not it
exercises village powers.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report passage recommended by committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 8, Noes 0
Passed 8–0 Apr 15, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Mar 11, 2010 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Hubler and Brooks;Cosponsored by Senators Kreitlow and Harsdorf
- Mar 11, 2010 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Urban and Local Affairs
- Mar 17, 2010 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 23, 2010 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 8, Noes 0
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1