Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
intoxicated operation of all-terrain vehicles, snowmobiles, motorboats, and motor vehicles, the calculation of the amount of moneys to be expended from the snowmobile account in the conservation fund for certain activities relating to snowmobile trails and routes, and providing penalties.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, a person may not operate a snowmobile, an all-terrain
vehicle (ATV), or a motorboat while under the influence of alcohol or a controlled
substance to a degree that he or she cannot operate the vehicle or boat safely. Under
current law, a personal watercraft is included in the definition of "motorboat."
Current law also prohibits the operation of an ATV, a recreational motorboat, or a
snowmobile by a person who has an alcohol concentration of 0.08 or more. For
motorboats being operated on a commercial basis, the maximum alcohol
concentration is 0.04. These laws are respectively referred to under current law as
the intoxicated operation of an ATV law, the intoxicated boating law, and the
intoxicated snowmobiling law. Under current law, a person who refuses to submit
to a legal request for a breath, blood, or urine sample pursuant to an arrest for
operating a snowmobile, an ATV, or a recreational motorboat while under the
influence is in violation of what is known as the refusal law.
Under current law, in imposing a penalty for a violation of the intoxicated
operation of an ATV, the intoxicated boating, or the intoxicated snowmobiling law,
a court may only count as a previous conviction of the same law, or the applicable
refusal law. For example, if a person is before the court for violating the intoxicated
snowmobiling law or the snowmobile refusal law, the court may count only previous
convictions of the intoxicated snowmobiling law and the snowmobile refusal law as
prior convictions. Previous convictions of the intoxicated operation of an ATV law
or of the intoxicated boating law or of the applicable refusal laws may not be counted.
Under the bill, a court must count previous convictions of any of these intoxicated
operation or refusal laws that occurred within the previous five years when imposing
a penalty for a violation of any of these laws.
The bill makes the provisions of the intoxicated operation of an ATV, the
intoxicated boating, and the intoxicated snowmobiling laws more consistent. These
changes include:
1. Raising the age of absolute sobriety for the operation of snowmobiles and
ATVs to 21. Current law requires absolute sobriety for persons under the age of 19
who are operating snowmobiles and ATVs and for persons under the age of 21 for
motorboats.
2. Adopting the higher penalties for various violations where the penalties for
violations of the intoxicated operation of an ATV law, the intoxicated boating law, the
intoxicated snowmobiling law, and the refusal law conflict.
3. Imposing increased penalties for violating the intoxicating boating law or the
intoxicated snowmobiling law or related refusal law if the motorboat or snowmobile
is operated with a passenger under 16 years of age. The increased penalty already
exists for a violation of the intoxicated operation of an ATV law and the ATV refusal
law.
4. Repealing the provisions that imposed increased penalties for operating an
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report passage recommended by committee on Public Safety, Ayes 8, Noes 0
Passed 8–0 Apr 2, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Mar 11, 2010 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Molepske Jr., Milroy, Turner, Hubler, Zigmunt, Staskunas and Clark;Cosponsored by Senator Taylor
- Mar 11, 2010 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Public Safety
- Mar 22, 2010 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 23, 2010 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Mar 24, 2010 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 25, 2010 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 26, 2010 · Assembly
LRB correction
- Mar 30, 2010 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Apr 2, 2010 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by committee on Public Safety, Ayes 8, Noes 0
- Apr 2, 2010 · Assembly
Referred to joint committee on Finance
- Apr 6, 2010 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 8, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Molepske Jr.
- Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representative Molepske Jr.
- Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
- May 6, 2010 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received