Skip to content

Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session

AB 841

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

intoxicated operation of all-terrain vehicles, snowmobiles, motorboats, and motor vehicles, the calculation of the amount of moneys to be expended from the snowmobile account in the conservation fund for certain activities relating to snowmobile trails and routes, and providing penalties.

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, a person may not operate a snowmobile, an all-terrain

vehicle (ATV), or a motorboat while under the influence of alcohol or a controlled

substance to a degree that he or she cannot operate the vehicle or boat safely. Under

current law, a personal watercraft is included in the definition of "motorboat."

Current law also prohibits the operation of an ATV, a recreational motorboat, or a

snowmobile by a person who has an alcohol concentration of 0.08 or more. For

motorboats being operated on a commercial basis, the maximum alcohol

concentration is 0.04. These laws are respectively referred to under current law as

the intoxicated operation of an ATV law, the intoxicated boating law, and the

intoxicated snowmobiling law. Under current law, a person who refuses to submit

to a legal request for a breath, blood, or urine sample pursuant to an arrest for

operating a snowmobile, an ATV, or a recreational motorboat while under the

influence is in violation of what is known as the refusal law.

Under current law, in imposing a penalty for a violation of the intoxicated

operation of an ATV, the intoxicated boating, or the intoxicated snowmobiling law,

a court may only count as a previous conviction of the same law, or the applicable

refusal law. For example, if a person is before the court for violating the intoxicated

snowmobiling law or the snowmobile refusal law, the court may count only previous

convictions of the intoxicated snowmobiling law and the snowmobile refusal law as

prior convictions. Previous convictions of the intoxicated operation of an ATV law

or of the intoxicated boating law or of the applicable refusal laws may not be counted.

Under the bill, a court must count previous convictions of any of these intoxicated

operation or refusal laws that occurred within the previous five years when imposing

a penalty for a violation of any of these laws.

The bill makes the provisions of the intoxicated operation of an ATV, the

intoxicated boating, and the intoxicated snowmobiling laws more consistent. These

changes include:

1. Raising the age of absolute sobriety for the operation of snowmobiles and

ATVs to 21. Current law requires absolute sobriety for persons under the age of 19

who are operating snowmobiles and ATVs and for persons under the age of 21 for

motorboats.

2. Adopting the higher penalties for various violations where the penalties for

violations of the intoxicated operation of an ATV law, the intoxicated boating law, the

intoxicated snowmobiling law, and the refusal law conflict.

3. Imposing increased penalties for violating the intoxicating boating law or the

intoxicated snowmobiling law or related refusal law if the motorboat or snowmobile

is operated with a passenger under 16 years of age. The increased penalty already

exists for a violation of the intoxicated operation of an ATV law and the ATV refusal

law.

4. Repealing the provisions that imposed increased penalties for operating an

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Clark (D) , Hubler (D) , Milroy (D) , Molepske Jr. (D) , Staskunas (D) , Turner (D) , Zigmunt (D)

1 cosponsors

Taylor (D)

Votes

Assembly: Report passage recommended by committee on Public Safety, Ayes 8, Noes 0

Passed 8–0 Apr 2, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Mar 11, 2010 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Molepske Jr., Milroy, Turner, Hubler, Zigmunt, Staskunas and Clark;Cosponsored by Senator Taylor

  2. Mar 11, 2010 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Public Safety

  3. Mar 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Mar 23, 2010 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Mar 24, 2010 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Mar 25, 2010 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  7. Mar 26, 2010 · Assembly

    LRB correction

  8. Mar 30, 2010 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  9. Apr 2, 2010 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by committee on Public Safety, Ayes 8, Noes 0

  10. Apr 2, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to joint committee on Finance

  11. Apr 6, 2010 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  12. Apr 8, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Molepske Jr.

  13. Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representative Molepske Jr.

  14. Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

  15. May 6, 2010 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received