Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
eliminating the requirement to pay a conversion fee for having land rezoned out of a farmland preservation zoning district.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, the Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer
Protection (DATCP) administers the Farmland Preservation Program, which
contains some of the requirements that a farmer must meet to qualify for the
farmland preservation tax credit. Under current law, one requirement for qualifying
for the farmland preservation tax credit is that the farmland must either be in a
farmland preservation zoning district under a certified farmland preservation
zoning ordinance or be covered by a farmland preservation agreement executed by
DATCP.
Under current law, in order to rezone land out of a farmland preservation
zoning district, a political subdivision must find that the land is better suited for a
use not allowed in a farmland preservation zoning district, that the rezoning is
substantially consistent with the certified county farmland preservation plan, and
that the rezoning will not substantially impair the agricultural use of surrounding
parcels that are zoned for agricultural use. Also under current law, a political
subdivision with a certified farmland preservation ordinance may not rezone land
out of a farmland preservation zoning district unless the person who requested the
rezoning pays a conversion fee equal to the number of acres rezoned multiplied by
three times the per acre value of the highest value of cropland in the city, village, or
town in which the land is located, as determined by the Department of Revenue for
the purposes of use value assessment.
This bill eliminates the requirement that a person who requests that land be
rezoned out of a farmland preservation district pay a conversion fee.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Full history
- Mar 16, 2010 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Newcomer, Roth, Bies, Gunderson, Kaufert, Kerkman, LeMahieu, Lothian, Spanbauer, Suder, Townsend, Vos and Ziegelbauer;Cosponsored by Senators A. Lasee, Leibham and Ellis
- Mar 16, 2010 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to joint committee on Finance
- Mar 31, 2010 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1