Skip to content

Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session

AB 874

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

increasing the reduction in Wisconsin Works benefits based on a positive drug test, paying the amount of the reduction to dependent children in the group, and granting rule-making authority.

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Among the types of assistance that the Wisconsin Works (W-2) program under

current law provides are work experience and benefits for low-income custodial

parents who are at least 18 years old. W-2 has three categories of employment

positions: 1) trial jobs, under which an individual receives at least minimum wage

from an employer and the W-2 agency pays a wage subsidy of up to $300 per month

to the employer; 2) community service jobs, under which an individual works in a

project that serves a useful public purpose or that will generate revenue to wholly

or partially offset the project's cost and receives a monthly grant of up to $673 from

the W-2 agency; and 3) transitional placements, under which an individual

participates in work activities in a community rehabilitation program, a job similar

to a community service job, or volunteer activities and receives a monthly grant of

up to $628 from the W-2 agency.

Under current law, if an individual in a community service job or a transitional

placement was convicted after August 22, 1996, in any state or federal court of a

felony that has as an element possession, use, or distribution of a controlled

substance, the individual must submit to a test for use of a controlled substance. If

the test results are positive, the individual's benefit is reduced by up to 15 percent

for at least 12 months, and the W-2 agency may require the individual to participate

in a drug abuse evaluation, assessment, and treatment program.

This bill increases the possible reduction in an individual's benefit for a positive

test result for the use of a controlled substance to up to 50 percent and provides that

the other members of the individual's W-2 group who are dependent children would

continue to receive the amount by which the individual's benefit is reduced in the

form of protective or vendor payments in the manner prescribed by the Department

of Children and Families by rule. A W-2 group consists of all of the following: 1) an

individual who is a custodial parent and his or her dependent children; 2) all

dependent children with respect to whom the individual's dependent child is a

custodial parent; and 3) the individual's spouse or nonmarital coparent residing in

the same household and all dependent children with respect to whom the spouse or

nonmarital coparent is a custodial parent. A dependent child is defined as a child

who lives with a parent and who is under 18 years old, or under 19 years old if he or

she is a full-time student in a secondary school or a vocational or technical

equivalent.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Brooks (R) , Friske (R) , Gunderson (R) , Honadel (R) , Knodl (R) , Newcomer (R) , Nygren (R) , Petrowski (R) , Pridemore (R) , Strachota (R) , Suder (R) , Tauchen (R) , Townsend (R) , Vos (R) , Zipperer (R)

3 cosponsors

Darling (R) , Lazich (R) , Leibham (R)

Full history

  1. Mar 19, 2010 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Knodl, Brooks, Friske, Gunderson, Honadel, Newcomer, Nygren, Petrowski, Pridemore, Strachota, Suder, Tauchen, Townsend, Vos and Zipperer;Cosponsored by Senators Darling, Lazich and Leibham

  2. Mar 19, 2010 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Children and Families

  3. Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly

    Withdrawn from committee on Children and Families and referred to committee on Rules pursuant to Assembly Rule 42 (3)(c)

  5. Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1