Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 875

Restoring the Minority Business Development Board and the Minority Business Grant and Loan Program

Topics: Commerce, Department of, Minority enterprise

Passed the Assembly, then stopped

The Assembly passed it on Apr 20, 2010, but the Senate never voted on it. A bill has to ⁠. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Mar 19, 2010

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Apr 20, 2010

  4. Senate vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The Senate never voted on it.

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to concur in pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

The Minority Business Grants and Loans Program (program), administered by the Department of Commerce (department), and the Minority Business Development Board (board) in the department, were eliminated by 2009 Wisconsin Act 28 (the biennial budget act). Under the program, the board was authorized to award a grant or loan to a minority group member, a minority business, certain nonprofit organizations, or private financial institutions. Minority group member was defined to mean any of the following persons: a) a black; b) a Hispanic; c) an American Indian; d) an Eskimo; e) an Aleut; f) a native Hawaiian; g) an Asian-Indian; h) a person of Asian-Pacific origin. Minority business was defined to mean a sole proprietorship, partnership, limited liability company, joint venture, or corporation with a principal place of business in Wisconsin that fulfilled both of the following requirements: it is at least 51 percent owned, controlled and actively managed by a minority group member or members who are U.S. citizens or persons lawfully admitted to the United States for permanent residence, and it is currently performing a useful business function. The recipient of a grant or loan under the program was required to undertake certain eligible activities, including education and training projects or the start-up, expansion, or acquisition of a business.

This bill restores the board and the program as it existed before the biennial budget act.

Who's behind it

8 representatives are its ⁠. All 8 are Democrats.

2 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 10 names

Authors (8)

Signed on in support (2)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Labor vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 1 · Apr 12, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Labor, Ayes 5, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 52 to 46 · Apr 20, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 52, Noes 46”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Apr 21, 2010

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Commerce, Utilities, Energy, and Rail.

  3. Apr 21, 2010

    The Senate received it.

  4. Apr 20, 2010

    The Assembly passed it, 52 to 46.

  5. Apr 20, 2010

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  6. Apr 20, 2010

    The Assembly adopted it.

  7. Apr 12, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  8. Apr 12, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 1.

  9. Mar 24, 2010

    The committee held a public hearing.

  10. Mar 23, 2010

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  11. Mar 19, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Labor.

  12. Mar 19, 2010

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Mar 19, 2010 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Young, Turner, A. Williams, Grigsby, Zepnick, Kessler, Richards and Berceau;Cosponsored by Senator Taylor

  2. Mar 19, 2010 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Labor

  3. Mar 23, 2010 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Mar 24, 2010 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Apr 7, 2010 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Apr 12, 2010 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by committee on Labor, Ayes 5, Noes 1

  7. Apr 12, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  8. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:24 A.M. on 4-20-2010 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 23

  9. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  10. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Young

  11. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 1 adopted

  12. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Representative Toles added as a coauthor

  13. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  14. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  15. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 52, Noes 46

  16. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  17. Apr 21, 2010 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  18. Apr 21, 2010 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Commerce, Utilities, Energy, and Rail

  19. Apr 28, 2010 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote