Assembly Bill 877
Duties of physicians and of the Medical Examining Board and requiring the exercise of rule-making authority
Topics: Medical Examining Board, Medical education, Physician
Became law
The governor signed it on May 19, 2010. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Mar 19, 2010
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Apr 15, 2010
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Apr 22, 2010
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2009 Wisconsin Act 382
Latest entry in the official record, May 21, 2010: “Published 6-1-2010”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Current law authorizes the Medical Examining Board (board) in the Department of Regulation and Licensing to issue licenses to practice medicine and surgery, to practice perfusion, and to practice as a physician assistant, and to certify respiratory care practitioners. This bill makes several changes to the laws regulating persons licensed, permitted, or certified by the board.
Order of summary suspension Currently, the board may summarily suspend a license, certificate, or other limited permit (credential) granted by the board if the board has probable cause to believe that the credential holder has violated the law and that suspending the credential is necessary to protect the public health, safety, or welfare. The board may suspend the credential for no more than 30 days pending hearing, but may extend the suspension for an additional 30 days while the hearing is in progress and, if the credential holder has caused a delay in the hearing process, from the time the hearing is commenced until a final decision is issued. In addition, the board may designate any of the officers of the board to suspend a credential for a period of up to 72 hours.
Read the full summary Show less
This bill provides that the board chair and two board members designated by the chair or, if the board chair is unavailable, the board vice-chair and two board members designated by the vice-chair, may exercise the authority to summarily suspend a credential. The bill requires an order of summary suspension to be served on the credential holder in the manner established for service of process. The bill eliminates both the 30-day and 72-hour limitations imposed under current law on a summary suspension. Instead, under the bill, the order of summary suspension remains in effect until the effective date of a final decision and order granted in a disciplinary hearing against the credential holder or until the order of summary suspension is discontinued by the board following a hearing to show cause.
The bill requires the board to issue a notice of hearing commencing a disciplinary proceeding against the credential holder no more than ten days after the order of summary suspension has been issued. The bill also requires the board to notify the credential holder that he or she may request a hearing to show cause. If a hearing to show cause is requested, the board must schedule the hearing on a date within 20 days of the board's receipt of the request.
Duty to report This bill requires a person licensed by the board as a physician to promptly submit a written report to the board when the person has reason to believe any of the following about another physician licensed by the board:
1. The other physician is engaged in acts that constitute a pattern of unprofessional conduct.
2. The other physician is engaged in an act that creates an immediate or continuing danger to one or more patients or to the public.
3. The other physician is or may be medically incompetent.
4. The other physician is or may be mentally or physically unable to engage in the practice of medicine or surgery.
The bill provides that a physician who complies in good faith with the duty to report may not be held civilly or criminally liable or be found guilty of unprofessional conduct.
Definition of "unprofessional conduct" Current law governing persons regulated by the board defines "unprofessional conduct" as those acts or attempted acts of commission or omission defined as unprofessional conduct by the board by rule and any act by a physician or physician assistant in violation of the law governing the prescriptive authority of the physician or physician assistant. This bill modifies the definition of "unprofessional conduct" to include failure on the part of a physician to comply with the duty to report as required under the bill.
Biennial training requirement Current law requires each person licensed or certified by the board to, by November 1 of each odd-numbered year, register with the board. As a condition of registration, each physician must submit proof of attendance at and completion within the preceding two calendar years of continuing education programs or courses of study approved by the board. The board may waive the requirement if it finds that exceptional circumstances have prevented the physician from meeting the requirement.
This bill requires a physician to complete professional development and maintenance of certification or performance improvement or continuing medical education programs or courses of study required by the board by rule, and to include proof of attendance at and completion of these additional programs or courses of study in the biennial application for registration with the board. The board may waive this new requirement if it finds that exceptional circumstances have prevented the physician from meeting the requirement.
Temporary educational permit to practice medicine and surgery Currently, the board may grant a temporary educational permit (TEP) to practice medicine and surgery to a person who has graduated and possesses a diploma from a medical or osteopathic college approved by the board and has completed postgraduate training of 12 months in a facility approved by the board.
The board may also grant a TEP to a graduate of a foreign medical school which has not been approved by the board if the graduate of a foreign medical school has had postgraduate training in this country in a 12-month program approved by the board or has had other professional experience suitable to the board, has passed the examinations given by the educational council for foreign medical graduates or its successors, and meets other conditions established by the board.
A person who holds a TEP may take postgraduate educational training in a facility approved by the board, perform services under the direction of a person licensed to practice medicine and surgery, and prescribe drugs other than narcotics.
This bill eliminates the prohibition on prescribing narcotics for a person holding a TEP.
Who's behind it
2 lawmakers are its . 1 is a Democrat. 1 has no party on record.
1 more lawmaker .
See all 3 names Hide the names
Authors (2)
- Jon Richards · Democrat, Assembly
- by request of The Medical Examining Board
Signed on in support (1)
- Fred A. Risser · Democrat, Senate
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
How lawmakers voted
There was one vote on this bill.
Assembly Committee on Health and Healthcare Reform vote to recommend it
Passed, 11 to 0 · Apr 2, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Health and Healthcare Reform, Ayes 11, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
May 21, 2010
The new law was published.
-
May 19, 2010
The governor signed it. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 382.
-
May 13, 2010
Sent to the governor.
-
Apr 22, 2010
The Senate passed it too.
-
Apr 16, 2010
Sent to the Senate Committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue.
-
Apr 16, 2010
The Senate received it.
-
Apr 15, 2010
The Assembly passed it.
-
Apr 2, 2010
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Apr 2, 2010
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 11 to 0.
-
Mar 24, 2010
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Mar 23, 2010
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Mar 19, 2010
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Health and Healthcare Reform.
-
Mar 19, 2010
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Mar 19, 2010 · Assembly
Introduced by Representative Richards, by request of The Medical Examining Board;Cosponsored by Senator Risser
- Mar 19, 2010 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Health and Healthcare Reform
- Mar 23, 2010 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 24, 2010 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Mar 31, 2010 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Apr 2, 2010 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by committee on Health and Healthcare Reform, Ayes 11, Noes 0
- Apr 2, 2010 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 11:50 A.M. on 4-15-2010 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 16, 2010 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Apr 16, 2010 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue
- Apr 22, 2010 · Senate
Rules suspended to withdraw from committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue and take up
- Apr 22, 2010 · Senate
Read a second time
- Apr 22, 2010 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Apr 22, 2010 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Apr 22, 2010 · Senate
Read a third time and concurred in
- Apr 22, 2010 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly
Received from Senate concurred in
- Apr 30, 2010 · Assembly
Report correctly enrolled
- May 13, 2010 · Assembly
Presented to the Governor on 5-13-2010
- May 19, 2010 · Assembly
Report approved by the Governor on 5-18-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 382
- May 21, 2010 · Assembly
Published 6-1-2010
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote