Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 879

Sentencing, revocation of parole or extended supervision, and requiring the exercise of rule-making authority

Topics: Crime and criminals: Felony, Earned Release Review Commission, Parole or probation, Sentences and penalties

Stopped in committee

It never got a ⁠, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Mar 23, 2010

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. No public hearing was held.

  3. Assembly vote, not reached

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It never got a hearing in the Assembly Committee on Criminal Justice pursuant to Assembly Rule 42 (3)(c). See every bill that never got a hearing this session.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

2009 Wisconsin Act 28 (the Act) made several changes to the adult correctional system, most of which took effect on October 1, 2009. Prior to the effective date of the provisions relating to the adult correctional system (pre-Act), a person who was imprisoned for a felony he or she committed prior to December 31, 1999, was allowed to petition the Parole Commission in the Department of Corrections (DOC) to be released to parole after the person served 25 percent of his or her sentence, or six months, whichever was greater. The Parole Commission determined whether, and under what conditions, the person should be released to parole. A person who committed a felony on or after December 31, 1999, is sentenced to a bifurcated sentence, with the first portion of the sentence served in confinement and the second portion served under extended supervision in the community.

Pre-Act, a person who was serving a bifurcated sentence was, with few exceptions, required to serve the entire confinement portion of his or her sentence before being released to extended supervision. A person's confinement portion could have been extended if he or she violated a prison regulation. If a person's confinement portion was extended for such a violation, the law pre-Act required his or her extended supervision portion to be reduced so that the total length of the person's sentence remained unchanged.

Read the full summary

The law pre-Act allowed a person who is sentenced to a bifurcated sentence for a Class C to Class I felony to petition the sentencing court to adjust his or her sentence and release the person from prison to extended supervision if he or she has served 85 percent (for Class C to Class E felonies) or 75 percent (for Class F to Class I felonies) of the confinement portion of the sentence. If a person's confinement portion was reduced by the sentencing court, the law pre-Act required his or her extended supervision portion to be extended so that the total length of the person's sentence remained unchanged. Pre-Act, a person who was released to extended supervision was required to serve his or her entire sentence before extended supervision terminated.

The Act eliminates the role of the sentencing court in adjusting sentences and renamed the Parole Commission the "Earned Release Review Commission" (ERRC).

The Act allows most persons who are incarcerated for a Class C to Class I felony to earn "positive adjustment time" toward early release from confinement. Under the Act, the amount of positive adjustment time a person can earn varies depending on the classification of the felony, the person's history and likelihood of reoffending, and other factors determined by DOC.

The Act requires DOC to release the person to extended supervision when he or she serves his entire period of confinement, minus positive adjustment time earned. Under the Act, if a person's period of confinement is reduced by positive adjustment time, his or her period of extended supervision is increased so that the length of the sentence does not change. The Act requires the ERRC to perform the duties previously performed by the Parole Commission and to review petitions for early release from confinement.

Pre-Act, persons who had committed most felonies were allowed to petition the sentencing court for release to extended supervision for the remaining term of his or her sentence if the person had a terminal condition, reached age 65 after serving at least five years of his or her term of confinement portion, or reached age 60 after serving at least ten years of his or her term of confinement portion.

Under the Act, the petition may also be filed by a person with any serious health condition and must be submitted to ERRC instead of to the sentencing court. In addition, under the Act, DOC may release to extended supervision any person serving the confinement portion of a bifurcated sentence if the person is not confined following a violent offense, the person is believed to be able to live in the community without assaulting another, and the release will not be more than 12 months before the date that the person otherwise would be eligible for release to extended supervision. If DOC releases a person, his or her term of extended supervision must be extended by the length of time he or she was originally sentenced to confinement so that the total length of the sentence does not change.

Pre-Act, if a person sentenced to a bifurcated sentence violated any condition of his or her release to extended supervision, the person's extended supervision was revoked, he or she was returned to prison, and the Division of Hearings and Appeals within the Department of Administration or DOC (reviewing authority) made a recommendation to the court that convicted the person as to how long the person should remain in prison. After it received the reviewing authority's recommendation, the court was allowed to order the person to remain in prison for a period of time that did not exceed the time remaining on his or her bifurcated sentence.

Under the Act, the reviewing authority determines how long to imprison the person whose extended supervision is revoked and enters its own order for the person to remain in prison for a period of time that does not exceed the time remaining on his or her bifurcated sentence.

This bill eliminates positive adjustment time, restores the Parole Commission, eliminates the ERRC, and returns the sentencing provisions, the provisions relating to early release from confinement, and the provisions relating to review of revocation of release to pre-Act law.

Who's behind it

37 lawmakers are its ⁠. 36 are Republicans and 1 is a Independent.

8 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 45 names

Authors (37)

Signed on in support (8)

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Apr 12, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Criminal Justice.

  3. Mar 23, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Corrections and the Courts.

  4. Mar 23, 2010

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Mar 23, 2010 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Suder, Ripp, J. Fitzgerald, Gottlieb, Kleefisch, Strachota, Knodl, Montgomery, Davis, Zipperer, Roth, Mursau, Petersen, Petrowski, Ziegelbauer, Townsend, Vos, Pridemore, Rhoades, Brooks, Huebsch, Spanbauer, LeMahieu, M. Williams, Gunderson, Kramer, Nygren, Stone, Nerison, Meyer, Ballweg, Bies, Nass, Honadel, Murtha, J. Ott and Lothian;Cosponsored by Senators Leibham, Lazich, Darling, S. Fitzgerald, Hopper, A. Lasee, Kedzie and Harsdorf

  2. Mar 23, 2010 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Corrections and the Courts

  3. Apr 12, 2010 · Assembly

    Withdrawn from committee on Corrections and the Courts and referred to committee on Criminal Justice pursuant to Assembly Rule 42 (3)(c)

  4. Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor