Assembly Bill 894
Prohibiting abusive work environments and permitting a person who has been subject to such an environment to bring a civil action
Topics: Circuit court, Court: Procedure, Employment, Worker's compensation
Stopped in committee
It had a but no committee vote, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.
-
Introduced, passed
Mar 24, 2010
-
Committee, stopped here
Stopped here. It had a hearing but no committee vote.
-
Assembly vote, not reached
-
Senate vote, not reached
-
Governor, not reached
-
Law, not reached
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to pass pursuant to ”
It sat with the Assembly Committee on Labor.
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
What it would have done
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Current law.
Under current law, worker's compensation is generally the exclusive remedy of an employee against his or her employer, a coemployee, or the employer's worker's compensation insurer for an injury sustained while performing services growing out of and incidental to employment.
Read the full summary Show less
Civil action for abusive work environment.
This bill provides an exception to that exclusive remedy provision permitting an employee who alleges that he or she has been injured by being subjected to an abusive work environment or by being subjected to retaliation or a threat of retaliation for opposing an abusive work environment or for initiating or in any manner participating in an investigation, action, or proceeding to enforce the right not to be subjected to an abusive work environment (collectively "unlawful employment practice") to bring an action in circuit court against the employer or employee who allegedly engaged in the unlawful employment practice for such relief as the court may consider appropriate.
Such an action must be commenced by the employee (aggrieved employee) within one year after the last act constituting the unlawful employment practice occurred or be barred.
Relief.
If the circuit court finds that an employer or employee has engaged in an unlawful employment practice, the court may enjoin the employer or employee from engaging in that practice and may grant such other relief as the court may consider appropriate, including reinstatement of the aggrieved employee, removal of the person who engaged in the abusive conduct giving rise to the unlawful employment practice from the aggrieved employee's work area, medical expenses, back pay, front pay, compensation for emotional distress, punitive damages, and reasonable costs and attorney fees. If the circuit court orders any payment of money because of an unlawful employment practice engaged in by an employee, the employer of the employee is liable for that payment. If an employer is found to have engaged in an unlawful employment practice that did not result in an adverse employment action against the aggrieved employee, the employer's liability for compensation for emotional distress may not exceed $25,000 and the employer is not liable for punitive damages.
Affirmative defenses.
The bill permits an employer or employee against whom an aggrieved employee brings an action for an unlawful employment practice to plead affirmative defenses as follows:
1. If the alleged unlawful employment practice did not result in an adverse employment action against the aggrieved employee, the employer may plead as an affirmative defense that: a) the employer exercised reasonable care to prevent and promptly correct the abusive conduct that was the basis for the aggrieved employee's cause of action; and b) the aggrieved employee unreasonably failed to take advantage of appropriate opportunities provided by the employer to prevent or correct that abusive conduct.
2. If the alleged unlawful employment practice resulted in an adverse employment action against the aggrieved employee, the employer may plead as an affirmative defense that the aggrieved employee's complaint is based on: a) an adverse employment action that was reasonably taken for poor performance, misconduct, or economic necessity; b) an adverse employment action that was taken in response to a reasonable performance evaluation; or c) a reasonable investigation of a potentially illegal or unethical activity.
3. An employee who is alleged to have engaged in an unlawful employment practice may plead as an affirmative defense that the employee engaged in that practice at the direction of the employer under threat of an adverse employment action against the employee for not engaging in that practice.
Double recovery prohibited.
Finally, the bill requires the court to reduce the amount awarded for medical expenses, back pay, or front pay in an action for an unlawful employment practice by the amount of medical expenses or disability benefits that the employer's worker's compensation insurer, the employer, if self-insured, or the Department of Workforce Development (DWD), if the employer is uninsured, has paid or is obligated to pay under the worker's compensation law for an injury arising out of the same underlying behavior as the behavior giving rise to the unlawful employment practice and to order the employer to reimburse the insurer or DWD for the amount of the medical expenses or disability benefits that the insurer or DWD has paid or is obligated to pay under the worker's compensation law or for the amount awarded in the action for medical expenses, back pay, or front pay, whichever is less.
Similarly, the bill provides that, if the aggrieved employee recovers medical expenses, back pay, or front pay in an action for an unlawful employment practice arising out of the same underlying behavior as the behavior giving rise to an injury that is compensable under the worker's compensation law, the amount payable for medical expenses or disability benefits under the worker's compensation law for that injury is reduced by the amount recovered for medical expenses, back pay, or front pay under the unlawful employment practice action.
Definitions.
For purposes of the bill:
1. "Abusive work environment" means a work environment in which an employee is subjected to abusive conduct that is so severe that it causes tangible harm, i.e., material impairment of physical or mental health or bodily integrity, to the employee.
2. "Abusive conduct" means conduct, including acts or omissions, by an employer or employee, with malice, i.e., intent to cause pain, injury, or distress to another person without legitimate cause or justification, that a reasonable person would find to be hostile based on the severity, nature, and frequency of the conduct.
"Abusive conduct" includes repeated infliction of verbal abuse such as derogatory remarks, insults, and epithets; verbal or physical conduct that is threatening, intimidating, or humiliating; sabotage or undermining of an employee's work performance; or exploitation of an employee's known psychological or physical vulnerability. "Abusive conduct," however, does not include a single act unless that act is especially severe or egregious.
3. "Adverse employment action" means an action taken by an employer with respect to an employee that has the effect, in whole or in part, of a penalty, including dismissal or suspension from employment, demotion, denial of a promotion, unfavorable transfer or reassignment, reduction in compensation, or denial of increased compensation. "Adverse employment action" also includes a constructive discharge, which is defined in the bill as a situation in which an employee resigns from employment because the employee reasonably believes that he or she was subjected to abusive conduct and, prior to resigning, the employee notified the employer of the abusive conduct and the employer failed to take reasonable steps to eliminate the abusive conduct.
Who's behind it
3 lawmakers are its . All 3 are Democrats.
1 more lawmaker .
See all 4 names Hide the names
Authors (3)
- Terese Berceau · Democrat, Assembly
- Kelda Roys · Democrat, Senate
- Christine Sinicki · Democrat, Assembly
Signed on in support (1)
- Spencer Coggs · Democrat, Senate
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
What happened
-
Apr 28, 2010
The session ended, and the bill died with it.
-
Apr 15, 2010
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Apr 7, 2010
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Mar 24, 2010
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Labor.
-
Mar 24, 2010
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Mar 24, 2010 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Roys, Sinicki and Berceau;Cosponsored by Senator Coggs
- Mar 24, 2010 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Labor
- Apr 6, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Roys
- Apr 7, 2010 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate