Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 904

Loans to manufacturing businesses for energy improvements, job creation, retooling, or clean energy production; the administration of energy utility programs; providing an exemption from emergency rule procedures; requiring the exercise of emergency rule-making procedures; and making appropriations

Topics: Commerce, Department of, Electric utility, Employment, Energy conservation, Industrial development, Public Service Commission

Stopped before the full Assembly voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Assembly never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Mar 26, 2010

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Assembly never voted on it.

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill authorizes the Department of Commerce (department) to make loans to manufacturing businesses for any of the following activities: 1) implementing energy efficiency measures in their facilities, 2) retooling to manufacture products that support the green economy, 3) expanding or establishing domestic clean energy manufacturing, or 4) creating or retaining workers engaged in the preceding activities.

The bill requires the department to promulgate rules that set clear job-creation standards for loan recipients, establish minimum energy savings requirements, give priority to existing manufacturing businesses, and ensure that loans will be distributed throughout the state. Under the bill, work paid for with loan proceeds must be performed by contractors and subcontractors who agree to pay employees who perform the work not less than the prevailing wage, as defined under current law applicable to certain municipal public works projects.

Read the full summary

Funding for loans under the bill comes from current appropriations that fund a variety of economic development programs, including appropriations that receive repayments of loans made by the department under other economic development programs and under the program created in the bill, and from certain federal moneys received by the state. Under the bill, the governor must deposit federal moneys that could be used to assist manufacturing businesses in the state retool for, or expand, production of clean energy in an appropriation account that funds loans under the program created by the bill, unless the moneys are otherwise appropriated and subject to applicable federal restrictions.

Current law requires investor-owned electric and natural gas utilities (energy utilities) to spend a specified percentage of their operating revenues on certain energy efficiency and renewable resource programs (energy utility programs).

Current law also requires the energy utilities to contract with one or more persons to administer the energy utility programs. The Public Service Commission (PSC) has certain oversight duties regarding the energy utility programs, including approving contracts for administration of the energy utility programs. This bill requires the energy utility programs to include components for implementing energy efficiency or renewable resource measures in manufacturing business facilities that are consistent with the objectives under the loan program described above. The bill requires a person with whom the energy utilities contract for administering the energy utility programs to ensure coordination between the loan program and the energy utility programs that are directed towards industrial and manufacturing customers of energy utilities. The bill also requires such a person to submit annual reports to the PSC and the department regarding the energy utility programs that are directed towards such customers. In addition, the bill requires the PSC to cooperate with the department to ensure coordination between the energy utility programs and the loan program.

Who's behind it

9 lawmakers are its ⁠. 8 are Democrats. 1 has no party on record.

6 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 15 names

Authors (9)

Signed on in support (6)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Joint Committee on Finance vote on an amendment

Passed, 11 to 4 · Apr 9, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 11, Noes 4”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Apr 15, 2010

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  3. Apr 9, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  4. Apr 9, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 11 to 4.

  5. Apr 6, 2010

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  6. Mar 31, 2010

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  7. Mar 30, 2010

    The committee held a public hearing.

  8. Mar 26, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Energy and Utilities.

  9. Mar 26, 2010

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Mar 26, 2010 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Mason, Molepske Jr., Grigsby, Shilling, Vruwink, Turner, Zepnick, Fields and Berceau;Cosponsored by Senators Lassa, Holperin, Lehman, Taylor, Kreitlow and Vinehout

  2. Mar 26, 2010 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Energy and Utilities

  3. Mar 30, 2010 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Mar 31, 2010 · Assembly

    Withdrawn from committee on Energy and Utilities and referred to joint committee on Finance pursuant to Assembly Rule 42 (3)(c)

  5. Apr 6, 2010 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Apr 7, 2010 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  7. Apr 7, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by joint committee on Finance

  8. Apr 9, 2010 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 11, Noes 4

  9. Apr 9, 2010 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 11, Noes 4

  10. Apr 9, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  11. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  12. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:27 A.M. on 4-20-2010 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 23

  13. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representatives Richards and Honadel

  14. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  15. Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote