Assembly Bill 906
Modifications to platting requirements
Topics: Municipality: Ordinance, Plats, Register of deeds
Stopped before the full Assembly voted
The recommended passing it, but the full Assembly never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.
-
Introduced, passed
Mar 26, 2010
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, stopped here
Stopped here. The full Assembly never voted on it.
-
Senate vote, not reached
-
Governor, not reached
-
Law, not reached
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to pass pursuant to ”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it would have done
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Under current law, a county, town, city, or village (approving authority) has the right to approve or object to a plat (the map of a subdivision). Generally, the location of the subdivision determines which approving authority or authorities have the right to approve the plat. Approval of a plat is conditioned, among other things, on the plat's compliance with the local ordinances and comprehensive, master, or development plan of the approving authority or authorities that have the right to approve the plat.
This bill specifies that the local ordinances with which a plat must comply are those in effect when the preliminary plat is submitted, or when the final plat is submitted if a preliminary plat is not. The bill allows an approving authority and a subdivider to agree to waive or vary requirements under an ordinance that is in effect when the preliminary plat, or final plat if no preliminary plat, is submitted and to agree as to the application of ordinances that are enacted by the approving authority after the preliminary plat, or final plat if no preliminary plat, is submitted.
Read the full summary Show less
Current law allows an approving authority to enact ordinances governing the subdivision of land that are more restrictive than the provisions in the statutes. The bill provides that local ordinances may not be enacted that are more restrictive than the provisions in the statutes with respect to time limits, deadlines, notice requirements, or other provisions that provide protections for subdividers.
Current law provides that if a preliminary plat is submitted, an approving authority may refuse to approve the final plat if it is not submitted within 24 months after the last required approval of the preliminary plat. The bill increases the time for submitting the final plat to 36 months after the last required approval of the preliminary plat and provides that any approving authority may extend this time.
Under current law, a subdivider may with the permission of the approving authority submit a final plat that is only the portion of the approved preliminary plat that the subdivider intends to record at that time. The bill provides that a subdivider does not need permission to submit a final plat that is only a portion of the preliminary plat if the preliminary plat identified phases of the development and the portion of the final plat that is being submitted substantially conforms to the preliminary plat.
Current law provides that if a preliminary plat is submitted and approved, the final plat is entitled to approval if it substantially conforms to the preliminary plat.
The bill requires a professional engineer, planner, or other person charged with the responsibility to review plats to provide the approving authority with his or her conclusions as to whether the final plat substantially conforms to the preliminary plat and with his or her recommendation on approval of the final plat.
Under current law, as a condition of approval, an approving authority may require a subdivider to execute a surety bond or provide other security to ensure that certain improvements will be made. The bill provides that the approving authority may not require any security for improvements sooner than is reasonably necessary before the commencement of the installation of the improvements and that, if the project will be constructed in phases, the amount of the security must be limited to the phase of the project that is being constructed.
Current law requires a subdivider to record the final plat in the office of the register of deeds in the county where the subdivision is located. The register of deeds may not accept the final plat for recording unless it is offered for recording within six months after the last approval and within 24 months after the first approval. The bill specifically provides that a subdivider may record the final plat in separate parts at different times. In addition, the bill extends the times for recording to within 12 months after the last approval and within 36 months after the first approval.
Who's behind it
8 lawmakers are its . 5 are Democrats and 3 are Republicans.
3 more lawmakers .
See all 11 names Hide the names
Authors (8)
- Terese Berceau · Democrat, Assembly
- Gordon Hintz · Democrat, Assembly
- Michael Huebsch · Republican, Assembly
- Louis Molepske Jr. · Democrat, Assembly
- Roger Roth · Republican, Senate
- James Soletski · Democrat, Assembly
- Scott Suder · Republican, Assembly
- Ted Zigmunt · Democrat, Assembly
Signed on in support (3)
- Rob Cowles · Republican, Senate
- Dave Hansen · Democrat, Senate
- Pat Kreitlow · Democrat, Senate
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There was one vote on this bill.
Assembly Committee on Urban and Local Affairs vote on an amendment
Passed, 8 to 0 · Apr 15, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 8, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Apr 28, 2010
The session ended, and the bill died with it.
-
Apr 15, 2010
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Apr 15, 2010
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 8 to 0.
-
Apr 6, 2010
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Mar 26, 2010
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Urban and Local Affairs.
-
Mar 26, 2010
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Mar 26, 2010 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Molepske Jr., Zigmunt, Berceau, Suder, Soletski, Roth, Huebsch and Hintz;Cosponsored by Senators Hansen, Kreitlow and Cowles
- Mar 26, 2010 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Urban and Local Affairs
- Apr 6, 2010 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Apr 9, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Molepske Jr.
- Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 8, Noes 0
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 8, Noes 0
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 11:28 A.M. on 4-20-2010 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 23
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Laid on the table
- Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote