Assembly Bill 910
Establishment of a Wisconsin conservation corps program, extending the time limit for emergency rule procedures, providing an exemption from emergency rule procedures, granting rule-making authority, and making appropriations
Topics: Administration, Department of: Boards and other subdivisions, Natural resource, Youth conservation programs
Passed the Assembly, then stopped
The Assembly passed it on Apr 22, 2010, but the Senate never voted on it. A bill has to . To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.
-
Introduced, passed
Mar 29, 2010
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Apr 22, 2010
-
Senate vote, stopped here
Stopped here. The Senate never voted on it.
-
Governor, not reached
-
Law, not reached
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to concur in pursuant to ”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Second chamber's vote
A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.
Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it would have done
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
This bill creates a Wisconsin conservation corps (WCC) program that seeks to protect, enhance, and provide access to Wisconsin's natural heritage and encourage and enable young people to learn the value of work in a natural setting by providing employment training and career pathways. The bill also creates a WCC Board, which is the policy-making body of the WCC and is attached to the Department of Administration (DOA). The WCC Board consists of the secretary of natural resources or his or her designee; the executive secretary of the Board of Commissioners of Public Lands; two representatives to the assembly, appointed as are members of assembly standing committees; two senators, appointed as are members of senate standing committees; one member of a nongovernmental organization that has expertise in conservation matters or that represents employees who work in conservation activities, for a three-year term; and two members of the faculty employed by a technical college district board, appointed by the state Technical College System Board, for three-year terms.
The bill provides funding for the WCC program from the conservation fund, the state normal school fund (a state trust fund that derives revenue from federal land grants), and from program fees that the board may assess to sponsors of projects.
Read the full summary Show less
Under the bill, DOA provides all staff services to the board and the board has no other staff. The bill directs the board to enter into an agreement with a nonprofit corporation that has demonstrated experience in natural resource conservation and youth training to manage and administer the WCC program. The manager then retains, trains, and supervises work crews to carry out each project. The manager also identifies, reviews, and recommends proposed projects for the approval of the board. The bill requires the board to ensure that projects are equally distributed across technical college districts to the greatest extent possible, and to ensure that at least one project is located in each technical college district in each year.
The bill provides that a project must be designed to carry out a specific goal within a defined period of time and must be focused on the conservation or enjoyment of natural resources and must have a specific, beneficial, physical effect. Projects may include new trail construction, trail rehabilitation, invasive species management, bridge and boardwalk construction, reforestation, timber stand improvement, stream bank stabilization, erosion control, rain garden installation, prairie restoration, historical site preservation, recreation site maintenance, wild land fire hazard reduction and fuels management, lake and stream restoration, boundary marking, fencing, landscaping, carpentry, and data collection for scientific research. The bill permits local governments or nonprofit corporations to submit applications to sponsor projects. A project application must identify the proposed project and provide a detailed plan for working on the project. In addition, the application must contain an enumeration of the number of work crews that will work on the project and a determination that work crew members would be eligible to participate in a youth corps program administered by the National and Community Service Board (NCSB) and other requirements under the WCC program, as well as a plan for training the work crew members, providing transportation to the project work sites, making available educational opportunities for work crew members while they are employed on the projects, for assisting work crew members in making full use of all benefits provided under such a youth corps program, and for visiting a technical college to familiarize the crew members with application and enrollment procedures, programs, and course offerings.
The bill provides that each work crew member on a WCC project must be between the ages of 18 and 25, and at least 50 percent of the work crew members on each project must have no postsecondary education and have a family income of not more than 200 percent of the federal poverty line on the date of their initial employment.
The bill provides that, if the board determines that an application is an appropriate WCC project and that work crew members would be eligible under the program, the board must jointly submit the application with the sponsor to NCSB for funding. If funding is provided by NCSB, the board must also make a grant to the sponsor to assist the sponsor in training the work crews.
The bill also directs NCSB, which utilizes federal and state funding to award grants to persons providing national and community service programs, to first allocate funding for grants to provide work for at least 240 participants in each fiscal year in youth corps programs provided by the WCC Board, to the extent that funding is available to NCSB and NCSB receives valid applications for the grants. Currently, NCSB is directed only to give priority in awarding grants, to the greatest extent practicable, to persons providing youth corps programs.
The bill requires each sponsor of a WCC project to do both of the following: upon completion of the project, erect a permanent plaque at each work site identifying the site as a WCC project; and submit a report to the board identifying the number of work crew members who enrolled at a technical college upon completion of the project and their status on the first anniversary of completion of the project.
The bill exempts services performed by WCC work crews from compliance with requirements for state and local public works projects to adhere to current prevailing wage scales. The bill permits the board to retain its manager and other state agencies to engage a WCC crew on a project without complying with state procurement laws, including requirements for public notice to and competitive solicitation of contractors and limitations on the circumstances when contractual services may be obtained.
Finally, the bill requires the board to submit an annual report to the legislature identifying the projects completed in each year or that are in the process of completion as of the end of that year.
Who's behind it
27 lawmakers are its . 25 are Democrats and 1 is a Independent. 1 has no party on record.
1 more lawmaker .
See all 28 names Hide the names
Authors (27)
- Terese Berceau · Democrat, Assembly
- Spencer Black · Democrat, Assembly
- Fred Clark · Democrat, Assembly
- Chris Danou · Democrat, Assembly
- Kristen Dexter · Democrat, Assembly
- Gary Hebl · Democrat, Assembly
- Steve Hilgenberg · Democrat, Assembly
- Kim Hixson · Democrat, Assembly
- Ann Hraychuck · Democrat, Assembly
- Mary Hubler · Democrat, Assembly
- Frederick Kessler · Democrat, Assembly
- Cory Mason · Democrat, Assembly
- Nick Milroy · Democrat, Assembly
- Louis Molepske Jr. · Democrat, Assembly
- Sandy Pasch · Democrat, Assembly
- Mark Pocan · Democrat, Assembly
- Sondy Pope · Democrat, Assembly
- Jon Richards · Democrat, Assembly
- Kelda Roys · Democrat, Senate
- Donna Seidel · Democrat, Assembly
- Shilling
- Jeff Smith · Democrat, Senate
- Robert Turner · Democrat, Assembly
- Amy Sue Vruwink · Democrat, Assembly
- Leon Young · Democrat, Assembly
- Bob Ziegelbauer · Independent, Assembly
- Ted Zigmunt · Democrat, Assembly
Signed on in support (1)
- Jim Holperin · Democrat, Senate
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 4 votes on this bill.
Assembly Committee on Natural Resources vote on an amendment
Passed, 15 to 0 · Apr 16, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Natural Resources, Ayes 15, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Joint Committee on Finance vote on an amendment
Passed, 15 to 0 · Apr 20, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 2 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 15, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Joint Committee on Finance vote on an amendment
Passed, 12 to 3 · Apr 20, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 12, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote to pass it
Passed, 78 to 19 · Apr 22, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 78, Noes 19”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Apr 28, 2010
The session ended, and the bill died with it.
-
Apr 28, 2010
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Apr 27, 2010
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Apr 23, 2010
The Senate received it.
-
Apr 22, 2010
The Assembly passed it, 78 to 19.
-
Apr 22, 2010
The Assembly adopted it.
-
Apr 20, 2010
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Apr 20, 2010
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 13 to 2.
-
Apr 16, 2010
Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.
-
Apr 16, 2010
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 14 to 1.
-
Apr 16, 2010
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Apr 14, 2010
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Apr 13, 2010
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Apr 12, 2010
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Natural Resources.
-
Mar 31, 2010
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Mar 29, 2010
Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.
-
Mar 29, 2010
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Mar 29, 2010 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Clark, Mason, Molepske Jr., Black, Pocan, Shilling, Hubler, Vruwink, Danou, Zigmunt, Hraychuck, Seidel, Roys, Dexter, Hixson, Hilgenberg, Richards, Smith, Young, Hebl, Pope-Roberts, Kessler, Milroy, Pasch, Berceau, Ziegelbauer and Turner;Cosponsored by Senator Holperin
- Mar 29, 2010 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to joint committee on Finance
- Mar 31, 2010 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 6, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representatives Clark and Mason
- Apr 12, 2010 · Assembly
Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and referred to committee on Natural Resources pursuant to Assembly Rule 42 (3)(c)
- Apr 12, 2010 · Assembly
LRB correction (Assembly substitute amendment 1)
- Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 14, 2010 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representatives Clark and Mason
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Apr 16, 2010 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 16, 2010 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Natural Resources, Ayes 15, Noes 0
- Apr 16, 2010 · Assembly
Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Natural Resources, Ayes 14, Noes 1
- Apr 16, 2010 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Natural Resources, Ayes 14, Noes 1
- Apr 16, 2010 · Assembly
Referred to joint committee on Finance
- Apr 19, 2010 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Apr 19, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 2 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by joint committee on Finance
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 2 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 15, Noes 0
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 12, Noes 3
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 13, Noes 2
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 11:13 A.M. on 4-22-2010 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 26
- Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 2 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 adopted
- Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly substitute amendment 1 adopted
- Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 78, Noes 19
- Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 23, 2010 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Apr 27, 2010 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 28, 2010 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 28, 2010 · Senate
Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
Terms on this page
Second chamber's vote
A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.
Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Second chamber's vote
A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.
Official term: Concurrence
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote