Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
the regulation, preservation, and restoration of historic buildings; the supplement to the federal historic rehabilitation tax credit and the state historic rehabilitation tax credit; requiring the certification of downtowns; promoting certain downtown areas in this state; highway projects involving business and downtown areas; granting rule-making authority; and making appropriations.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill makes numerous changes with regard to historic buildings and
downtown development. Significant provisions include the following:
Historic buildings
State Historic Building Code
Current law authorizes the Department of Commerce (Commerce) to regulate
the preservation and restoration of qualified historic buildings. A qualified historic
building is a building that is listed on the national or state register of historic places,
or a certified local register of historic property, or that is located in a district that is
listed on the national or state register of historic places and is of historical
significance to the district. Current law permits Commerce, in consultation with the
Historic Building Code Council, to promulgate a historic building code that provides
specific standards for the preservation or restoration of qualified historic buildings,
while still providing for the health, safety, and welfare of occupants of and visitors
to historic buildings. In addition, to permit the preservation or restoration of
qualified historic buildings, Commerce may grant a variance from any rule
promulgated under the chapters of the statutes relating to the regulation of industry,
buildings, and safety or the regulation of plumbing, fire protection systems, and
swimming pools.
With certain exceptions, the owner of a qualified historic building may elect to
be subject to the State Historic Building Code. With limited exceptions, an owner
who makes this election is exempt from any provision of any other building code,
including a local building code, that concerns a matter that is dealt with in the State
Historic Building Code. Although current law does not contain an administrative
procedure designed specifically to determine whether an owner is entitled to this
exemption, current law does contain a procedure that an owner may follow to resolve
any conflicts between a local order and any order of Commerce that relates to the
safety of places of employment or certain buildings that are open to the public (public
buildings).
This bill specifies that the State Historic Building Code must be liberally
interpreted to facilitate the preservation and restoration of qualified historic
buildings. The bill also creates a specific administrative procedure for determining
the extent to which a provision in a local building code applies to a qualified historic
building. The bill permits the owner of a qualified historic building who has elected
to be governed by the State Historic Building Code to request that Commerce review
any decision of a local governmental unit that requires the owner to comply with a
provision in a local ordinance. Commerce must review the decision to determine
whether the provision in the ordinance concerns a matter dealt with in the State
Historic Building Code, in which case the owner would be exempt from the provision.
Commerce must consult with the State Historical Society (SHS) before making its
determination. The bill specifies that, in performing this review, Commerce must
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Full history
- Feb 27, 2009 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Shilling, Hintz, Molepske Jr., Lothian, Seidel, Dexter, Clark, Ballweg, Jorgensen, Bernard Schaber, Spanbauer, Strachota and Davis;Cosponsored by Senators Lassa, Erpenbach, Risser, Taylor, Plale, Harsdorf, Vinehout, Lehman, Schultz, Darling and Leibham
- Feb 27, 2009 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Jobs, the Economy and Small Business
- Mar 9, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 12, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 12, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 12, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 25, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1