Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 95

Preparation time as a mandatory subject of collective bargaining

Topics: Collective bargaining, Public employee, School: Employee, Teacher

Became law

The governor signed it on Jul 21, 2009. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 27, 2009

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 52 to 47

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed 18 to 15

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2009 Wisconsin Act 34

Latest entry in the official record, Jul 24, 2009: “Published 8-3-2009”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, there are three categories of subjects of collective bargaining under the Municipal Employment Relations Act (MERA). A mandatory subject of bargaining is one primarily related to wages, hours, and conditions of employment; the employer is required to bargain over this subject. A permissive subject of bargaining is one primarily related to the management and direction of the municipal employer; an employer may, but need not, bargain over this subject. A prohibited subject of bargaining is one that would violate a law; there may be no bargaining over such a subject.

This bill creates a new mandatory subject of collective bargaining under MERA in school districts. Under the bill, in a school district, the employer is required to bargain collectively with respect to time spent during the school day, separate from pupil contact time, to prepare lessons, labs, or educational materials, to confer or collaborate with other staff, or to complete administrative duties.

Who's behind it

17 lawmakers are its ⁠. All 17 are Democrats.

9 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 26 names

Authors (17)

Signed on in support (9)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 4 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Labor vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 3 · Apr 23, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Labor, Ayes 5, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 52 to 47 · Apr 28, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 52, Noes 47”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 52 to 47 · Apr 28, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 52, Noes 47”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 18 to 15 · Jun 9, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 18, Noes 15”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Jul 24, 2009

    The new law was published.

  2. Jul 21, 2009

    The governor signed it. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 34.

  3. Jul 21, 2009

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Jun 9, 2009

    The Senate passed it too, 18 to 15.

  5. May 4, 2009

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs.

  6. Apr 29, 2009

    The Senate received it.

  7. Apr 28, 2009

    The Assembly passed it, 52 to 47.

  8. Apr 23, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  9. Apr 23, 2009

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 3.

  10. Apr 8, 2009

    The committee held a public hearing.

  11. Mar 9, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  12. Feb 27, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Labor.

  13. Feb 27, 2009

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 27, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Sinicki, Mason, Toles, Pope-Roberts, Soletski, Hixson, Pocan, Bernard Schaber, Zigmunt, Berceau, Smith, Vruwink, Milroy, Benedict, Young, Turner and Zepnick;Cosponsored by Senators Erpenbach, Lehman, Taylor, Wirch, Hansen, Vinehout, Coggs, Risser and Miller

  2. Feb 27, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Labor

  3. Mar 9, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Mar 9, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Apr 8, 2009 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  6. Apr 16, 2009 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  7. Apr 23, 2009 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by committee on Labor, Ayes 5, Noes 3

  8. Apr 23, 2009 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  9. Apr 23, 2009 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 4-28-2009 by committee on Rules

  10. Apr 28, 2009 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  11. Apr 28, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representatives Kramer and Vukmir

  12. Apr 28, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 52, Noes 47

  13. Apr 28, 2009 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  14. Apr 28, 2009 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  15. Apr 28, 2009 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 52, Noes 47

  16. Apr 28, 2009 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  17. Apr 29, 2009 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  18. May 4, 2009 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs

  19. Jun 9, 2009 · Senate

    Rules suspended to withdraw from committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs and take up

  20. Jun 9, 2009 · Senate

    Read a second time

  21. Jun 9, 2009 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  22. Jun 9, 2009 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  23. Jun 9, 2009 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 18, Noes 15

  24. Jun 9, 2009 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  25. Jun 10, 2009 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  26. Jun 16, 2009 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled

  27. Jul 21, 2009 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 7-17-2009

  28. Jul 21, 2009 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 7-20-2009. 2009 Wisconsin Act 34

  29. Jul 24, 2009 · Assembly

    Published 8-3-2009

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote