Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 959

The due date for payment of yield taxes on merchantable timber cut on damaged managed forest land and the assessment of payments per acre for damaged managed forest land

Topics: Forestry, Forestry: Taxation, Natural disaster

Stopped in committee

It never got a ⁠, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Apr 15, 2010

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. No public hearing was held.

  3. Assembly vote, not reached

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 30, 2010: “Fiscal estimate received”

It never got a hearing in the Assembly Committee on Forestry. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) administers the managed forest land (MFL) program that exempts a landowner from payment of municipal property taxes on land in the program in exchange for the landowner's payment of an acreage share (acreage share payments), which is lower than the municipal property tax, and for the landowner's compliance with approved forestry and other conservation practices. The duration of an MFL order may be either 25 or 50 years.

Current law also provides that, when merchantable timber is cut from MFL, a yield tax of 5 percent is imposed on the stumpage value of the timber. "Stumpage value" is the value of timber before it is cut as estimated in rules promulgated by DNR.

Read the full summary

This bill allows the owner of MFL to apply to DNR to extend the due date for the payment of yield taxes by an additional ten years from the date on which those taxes would ordinarily be due, under certain circumstances. An owner may apply for an extension if a catastrophic event caused a 50 percent or more reduction in the total stumpage value of the merchantable timber on all of the tracts of MFL for which the owner applies for an extension. The bill defines a "catastrophic event" as damage caused by fire, ice, snow, wind, flooding, insects, or disease. The bill provides that the owner is eligible for the extension only if the damaged tracts of MFL constitute at least 15 percent of the land under the owner's MFL order.

The bill also allows an owner of MFL to make acreage share payments in a reduced amount for a period of ten years following the expiration of the MFL order under certain limited circumstances. To be eligible for the reduced payments, the MFL owner must qualify for an extension of the due date for the payment of yield taxes on the MFL based on a catastrophic event that occurred within 15 years before the expiration of the MFL order for the land. The land must also be reenrolled in the MFL program. Under these circumstances, the owner may make acreage share payments in the amount required under the MFL order that was in effect at the time of the catastrophic event instead of the amount that would otherwise be due.

Who's behind it

Marlin Schneider, a Democrat, is its ⁠.

See all the details

Author (1)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

What happened

  1. Apr 30, 2010

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  2. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  3. Apr 22, 2010

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  4. Apr 15, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Forestry.

  5. Apr 15, 2010

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representative Schneider

  2. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Forestry

  3. Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

  5. Apr 30, 2010 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate