Assembly Bill 993
Ratification of the agreement negotiated between the state of Wisconsin and the Wisconsin State Employees Union, AFSCME Council 24, and its appropriate affiliated locals, AFL-CIO, for the 2009-11 biennium, covering employees in the technical collective bargaining unit, and authorizing an expenditure of funds
Topics: Collective bargaining, Extraordinary session, 2010: December, Public employee: Labor union
Passed the Assembly, then stopped
The Assembly passed it on Dec 15, 2010, but the Senate never voted on it. A bill has to . To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.
-
Introduced, passed
Dec 15, 2010
-
Committee, passed
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed 48 to 47
-
Senate vote, stopped here
Stopped here. The Senate never voted on it.
-
Governor, not reached
-
Law, not reached
Latest entry in the official record, Dec 15, 2010: “Refused to concur in, Ayes 16, Noes 16”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Second chamber's vote
A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.
Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it would have done
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
This proposal is introduced under section 111.92 (1) of the statutes. The proposal ratifies the collective bargaining contract for state employees in the technical collective bargaining unit negotiated for the 2009-11 biennium under the State Employment Labor Relations Act. Currently, statutory program supplement appropriations fund the costs of collective bargaining agreements to the extent that they exceed budgeted costs. The proposal authorizes expenditure of moneys from those appropriations to fund the cost of this agreement.
Who's behind it
Committee on Employment Relations is its .
See all the details Hide the names
Author (1)
- Committee on Employment Relations
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
How lawmakers voted
There were 2 votes on this bill.
Assembly vote to pass it
Passed, 48 to 47 · Dec 15, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 48, Noes 47”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote to pass it
Failed, 16 to 16 · Dec 15, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Refused to concur in, Ayes 16, Noes 16”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Dec 15, 2010
“Read a third time” (the official wording)
-
Dec 15, 2010
The Senate received it.
-
Dec 15, 2010
The Assembly passed it, 48 to 47.
-
Dec 15, 2010
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Dec 15, 2010
“Read first time and referred to calendar” (the official wording)
-
Dec 15, 2010
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Dec 15, 2010 · Assembly
Introduced by joint committee on Employment Relations
- Dec 15, 2010 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to calendar
- Dec 15, 2010 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Dec 15, 2010 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Dec 15, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Dec 15, 2010 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Dec 15, 2010 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 48, Noes 47
- Dec 15, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Dec 15, 2010 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Dec 15, 2010 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Dec 15, 2010 · Senate
Rules suspended to withdraw from committee on Senate Organization and take up
- Dec 15, 2010 · Senate
Read a second time
- Dec 15, 2010 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Dec 15, 2010 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Dec 15, 2010 · Senate
Read a third time
- Dec 15, 2010 · Senate
Refused to concur in, Ayes 16, Noes 16
Terms on this page
Second chamber's vote
A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.
Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Second chamber's vote
A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.
Official term: Concurrence
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote