Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Joint Resolution 109

Prohibiting partial vetoes of parts of bill sections (first consideration)

Topics: Constitutional amendments: First consideration, Governor

Stopped before the full Assembly voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Assembly never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new proposal.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 19, 2010

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Assembly never voted on it.

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Adopted, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to adopt pursuant to ⁠”

Read the proposal

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This proposed constitutional amendment, proposed to the 2009 legislature on first consideration, amends the Wisconsin Constitution to prohibit the governor, in exercising his or her partial veto power over an appropriations bill, from partially vetoing parts of bill sections of an enrolled bill without rejecting the entire bill section. Currently, in exercising the partial veto power, the governor is limited only insofar as that he or she may not create a new word by rejecting individual letters in the words of the enrolled bill, and may not create a new sentence by combining parts of two or more sentences of the enrolled bill. The new restriction on the governor's partial veto power contained in this resolution subsumes and expands on the current restrictions in the constitution.

A proposed constitutional amendment requires adoption by two successive legislatures, and ratification by the people, before it can become effective.

Who's behind it

13 lawmakers are its ⁠. 12 are Democrats and 1 is a Republican.

5 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 18 names

Authors (13)

Signed on in support (5)

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this proposal.

Assembly Committee on Judiciary and Ethics vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 4 · Mar 4, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption recommended by committee on Judiciary and Ethics, Ayes 5, Noes 4”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the proposal died with it.

  2. Mar 4, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  3. Mar 4, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend adopting it, 5 to 4.

  4. Mar 2, 2010

    The committee held a public hearing.

  5. Feb 19, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Judiciary and Ethics.

  6. Feb 19, 2010

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 19, 2010 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Hebl, Parisi, Staskunas, Townsend, Berceau, Sinicki, Black, Roys, Jorgensen, A. Williams, Smith, Zepnick and Hraychuck;Cosponsored by Senators Risser, Holperin, Kreitlow, Miller and Robson

  2. Feb 19, 2010 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary and Ethics

  3. Mar 2, 2010 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  5. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Report adoption recommended by committee on Judiciary and Ethics, Ayes 5, Noes 4

  6. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  7. Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Failed to adopt pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote