Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Senate Bill 10

The income and franchise tax credit that supplements the federal historic rehabilitation tax credit

Topics: Building, Corporation, Franchise: Taxation, Historical society, Income tax: Credit

Stopped before the full Senate voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Senate never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Jan 21, 2009

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Senate never voted on it.

  4. Assembly vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, a person who owns an income-producing historic building may claim a federal income tax credit that is equal to 20 percent of certain costs to rehabilitate the historic building. To claim the credit, the building must be listed, or be eligible for listing, on the national register of historic places or located in certain national, state, or local historic districts, and the rehabilitation work must comply with standards established by the secretary of the interior.

Under current law, a person who may claim the federal income tax credit for rehabilitating an income-producing historic building may also claim a state income tax or franchise tax credit that is equal to 5 percent of certain costs to rehabilitate the historic building. To claim the credit, the person must include with the person's tax return evidence that the secretary of the interior approved the rehabilitation work before the rehabilitation work began.

Read the full summary

Under this bill, a person may claim the state income and franchise tax credit for rehabilitating an income-producing historic building if the person includes with the person's tax return evidence that the state historic preservation officer recommended the rehabilitation work for approval by the secretary of the interior before the rehabilitation work began and that the rehabilitation was approved by the secretary of the interior.

Under current law, each partner in a partnership or member of a limited liability company is allocated a portion of any tax credit that the partnership or limited liability company may claim, including the credit for rehabilitating a historic building, based on each partner's or member's ownership interest. Under this bill, a partner or member is allocated a portion of the tax credit for rehabilitating a historic building in a manner specified in an agreement with the other partners or members.

Who's behind it

11 senators are its ⁠. 7 are Democrats and 4 are Republicans.

18 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 29 names

Authors (11)

Signed on in support (18)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Economic Development vote on an amendment

Passed, 7 to 0 · Mar 31, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Economic Development, Ayes 7, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 4 to 0 · Apr 20, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 4, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Apr 20, 2009

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  3. Mar 31, 2009

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 7 to 0.

  4. Mar 31, 2009

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Economic Development, Ayes 7, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  5. Feb 20, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  6. Feb 19, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  7. Feb 19, 2009

    The committee held a public hearing.

  8. Jan 26, 2009

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Economic Development,.

  9. Jan 21, 2009

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue.

  10. Jan 21, 2009

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Jan 21, 2009 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Lassa, Lehman, Hopper, Risser, Harsdorf, Coggs, Erpenbach, Schultz, Hansen, Kedzie and Plale;Cosponsored by Representatives Shilling, Richards, Davis, Roys, Strachota, Molepske Jr., Ballweg, Roth, Barca, Petrowski, Vruwink, Nygren, Spanbauer, Berceau, Stone, Suder, Gunderson and A. Ott

  2. Jan 21, 2009 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue

  3. Jan 23, 2009 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Lassa

  4. Jan 26, 2009 · Senate

    Withdrawn from committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue and rereferred to committee on Economic Development, pursuant to Senate Rule 46 (2)(c)

  5. Feb 19, 2009 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  6. Feb 19, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  7. Feb 20, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  8. Mar 31, 2009 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  9. Mar 31, 2009 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Economic Development, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  10. Mar 31, 2009 · Senate

    Report introduction and adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by committee on Economic Development, Ayes 7, Noes 0 by committee on Economic Development

  11. Mar 31, 2009 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Economic Development, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  12. Mar 31, 2009 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  13. Apr 20, 2009 · Senate

    Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 4, Noes 0

  14. Apr 28, 2010 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote