Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Senate Bill 103

Restrictions on the operation of motor vehicles by persons using electronic text messaging devices and providing a penalty

Topics: Crime and criminals: Felony, Damage (personal injury), Death, Legislature: Criminal Penalties, Joint Review Committee on, Motor vehicle: Regulation, Telecommunications, Telephone

Passed the Senate, then stopped

The Senate passed it on Oct 20, 2009, but the Assembly never voted on it. A bill has to ⁠. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Mar 3, 2009

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed 32 to 0

  4. Assembly vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The Assembly never voted on it.

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to concur in pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Current law prohibits inattentive driving of a motor vehicle, which means that a driver of a motor vehicle may not be so engaged or occupied as to interfere with the safe driving of the vehicle. Any person convicted of inattentive driving may be required to forfeit not less than $20 nor more than $400.

This bill prohibits the use of an electronic text messaging device, except to report an emergency, by anyone who is operating a motor vehicle in this state. An "electronic text messaging device" is defined as an electronic device, including a cellular telephone, personal digital assistant, or portable or mobile computer while being used for purposes of text communications, that is capable of transmitting or receiving text communications to or from one or more other persons. The definition of electronic text messaging device does not include devices that transmit or receive emergency alert messages or messages relating to the operation of the vehicle or an accessory that is integrated into the electrical system of a vehicle, including global positioning system devices. The bill provides an exception to this prohibition for persons operating authorized emergency vehicles. Persons who violate this prohibition may be required to forfeit not less than $100 nor more than $400 for a first offense, and not less than $200 nor more than $800 for a second or subsequent conviction. Persons who, in the course of using an electronic text messaging device while operating a motor vehicle, cause bodily harm to another person must be fined not less than $300 nor more than $2,000 or be imprisoned for not more than 30 days in the county jail, or both. Persons who, in the course of using an electronic text messaging device while operating a motor vehicle, cause great bodily harm to another person must be fined not less than $300 nor more than $2,000 or be imprisoned for not less than 30 days nor more than one year in the county jail, or both. Persons who, in the course of using an electronic text messaging device while operating a motor vehicle, cause the death of another person or an unborn child are guilty of a Class G felony, which is punishable by a fine not to exceed $25,000 or imprisonment not to exceed ten years, or both.

Read the full summary

Because this bill creates a new crime or revises a penalty for an existing crime, the Joint Review Committee on Criminal Penalties may be requested to prepare a report concerning the proposed penalty and the costs or savings that are likely to result if the bill is enacted.

Who's behind it

12 senators are its ⁠. 6 are Democrats and 6 are Republicans.

11 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 23 names

Authors (12)

Signed on in support (11)

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 4 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Transportation vote on an amendment

Passed, 6 to 1 · Jul 17, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources, Ayes 6, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote on an amendment

Passed, 32 to 0 · Oct 20, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Senate amendment 1 to Senate substitute amendment 1 adopted, Ayes 32, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 27 to 5 · Oct 20, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 27, Noes 5”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Transportation vote to recommend it

Passed, 10 to 2 · Nov 10, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 10, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Nov 10, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  3. Nov 10, 2009

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 10 to 2.

  4. Oct 23, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Transportation.

  5. Oct 22, 2009

    The Assembly received it.

  6. Oct 20, 2009

    The Senate passed it, 27 to 5.

  7. Oct 20, 2009

    The Senate adopted it.

  8. Oct 20, 2009

    “Senator Miller added as a coauthor of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1” (the official wording)

  9. Oct 20, 2009

    1 more senator signed on in support.

  10. Oct 20, 2009

    The Senate adopted it, 32 to 0.

  11. Jul 17, 2009

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 2.

  12. Jul 17, 2009

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources, Ayes 6, Noes 1” (the official wording)

  13. Mar 19, 2009

    The committee held a public hearing.

  14. Mar 3, 2009

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources.

  15. Mar 3, 2009

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Mar 3, 2009 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators A. Lasee, Cowles, Lehman, Carpenter, Risser, Lassa, Harsdorf, Taylor, Darling, Schultz, Olsen and Hansen;Cosponsored by Representatives Barca, Townsend, Van Roy, Bies, Spanbauer, Lothian, Petrowski, A. Ott, Friske and Strachota

  2. Mar 3, 2009 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources

  3. Mar 19, 2009 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  4. May 20, 2009 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator A. Lasee

  5. Jun 5, 2009 · Senate

    Senate amendment 2 offered by Senator A. Lasee

  6. Jul 16, 2009 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  7. Jul 17, 2009 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources, Ayes 6, Noes 1

  8. Jul 17, 2009 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources, Ayes 5, Noes 2

  9. Jul 17, 2009 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  10. Sep 28, 2009 · Senate

    Senate substitute amendment 1 offered by Senator A. Lasee

  11. Oct 13, 2009 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 10-20-2009 by committee on Senate Organization

  12. Oct 20, 2009 · Senate

    Read a second time

  13. Oct 20, 2009 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 to Senate substitute amendment 1 offered by Senator Decker

  14. Oct 20, 2009 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 to Senate substitute amendment 1 adopted, Ayes 32, Noes 0

  15. Oct 20, 2009 · Senate

    Senate amendment 2 to Senate substitute amendment 1 offered by Senators Olsen, Ellis, Harsdorf, Schultz, Cowles and Hansen

  16. Oct 20, 2009 · Senate

    Senate amendment 2 to Senate substitute amendment 1 withdrawn and returned to author

  17. Oct 20, 2009 · Senate

    Senate amendment 3 to Senate substitute amendment 1 offered by Senator Carpenter

  18. Oct 20, 2009 · Senate

    Senator Miller added as a coauthor

  19. Oct 20, 2009 · Senate

    Senator Miller added as a coauthor of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1

  20. Oct 20, 2009 · Senate

    Senate amendment 3 to Senate substitute amendment 1 withdrawn and returned to author

  21. Oct 20, 2009 · Senate

    Senate amendment 2 to Senate substitute amendment 1 resubmitted

  22. Oct 20, 2009 · Senate

    Senate amendment 2 to Senate substitute amendment 1 adopted

  23. Oct 20, 2009 · Senate

    Senate substitute amendment 1 adopted

  24. Oct 20, 2009 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  25. Oct 20, 2009 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  26. Oct 20, 2009 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 27, Noes 5

  27. Oct 20, 2009 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  28. Oct 22, 2009 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  29. Oct 23, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation

  30. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  31. Nov 10, 2009 · Assembly

    Report concurrence recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 10, Noes 2

  32. Nov 10, 2009 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  33. Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote