Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Senate Bill 110

Regulation of certain dog breeders, granting rule-making authority, making an appropriation, and providing a penalty

Topics: Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection, Department of, Dogs, Legislature: Criminal Penalties, Joint Review Committee on

Stopped in committee

It never got a ⁠, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Mar 11, 2009

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. No public hearing was held.

  3. Senate vote, not reached

  4. Assembly vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It never got a hearing in the Senate Committee on Agriculture and Higher Education. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill requires certain persons who breed and sell dogs (commercial dog breeders) to be licensed by the Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection (DATCP). The licensing requirement applies to a person who is engaged in the business of breeding dogs and who sells or offers to sell at least 100 dogs in a year for resale.

The bill authorizes DATCP to inspect a location for which a commercial dog breeder license is required before issuing an initial license. The bill also authorizes DATCP to inspect a location for which a commercial dog breeder license is required when DATCP has reason to believe that there is a violation of this state's criminal laws relating to the treatment of animals or of the federal Animal Welfare Act. The bill requires DATCP to promulgate rules setting fees for commercial dog breeder licenses. The bill provides civil and criminal penalties for operating without a required license and authorizes DATCP to suspend or revoke a license if it finds a violation of this state's criminal laws relating to the treatment of animals or of the federal Animal Welfare Act.

Read the full summary

Because this bill creates a new crime or revises a penalty for an existing crime, the Joint Review Committee on Criminal Penalties may be requested to prepare a report concerning the proposed penalty and the costs or savings that are likely to result if the bill is enacted.

Who's behind it

Alberta Darling, a Republican, is its ⁠.

6 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 7 names

Author (1)

Signed on in support (6)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Apr 8, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  3. Mar 11, 2009

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Agriculture and Higher Education.

  4. Mar 11, 2009

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Mar 11, 2009 · Senate

    Introduced by Senator Darling;Cosponsored by Representatives J. Ott, A. Ott, Van Roy, Bies, Spanbauer and Honadel

  2. Mar 11, 2009 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Agriculture and Higher Education

  3. Apr 8, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Apr 28, 2010 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate