Skip to content

Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session

SB 116

Became law Official bill text Atom feed

the method by which the Department of Revenue makes certain calculations regarding tax incremental financing district number 4 in the village of Elmwood.

  1. Introduced, completed
  2. Passes Senate, completed
  3. Passes Assembly, completed
  4. Governor signs, completed
  5. Law, completed

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under the current tax incremental financing program, a city or village may

create a tax incremental district (TID) in part of its territory to foster development

if at least 50 percent of the area to be included in the TID is blighted, in need of

rehabilitation or conservation, suitable for industrial sites, or suitable for mixed-use

development. Before a city or village may create a TID, several steps and plans are

required. These steps and plans include public hearings on the proposed TID within

specified time frames, preparation and adoption by the local planning commission

of a proposed project plan for the TID, approval of the proposed project plan by the

common council or village board, and adoption of a resolution by the common council

or village board that creates the TID as of a date provided in the resolution.

Also under current law, once a TID has been created, the Department of

Revenue (DOR) calculates the "tax increment base value" of the TID, which is the

equalized value of all taxable property within the TID at the time of its creation. If

the development in the TID increases the value of the property in the TID above the

base value, a "value increment" is created. That portion of taxes collected on the

value increment in excess of the base value is called a "tax increment." The tax

increment is placed in a special fund that may be used only to pay back the project

costs of the TID. The costs of a TID, which are initially incurred by the creating city

or village, include public works, such as sewers, streets, and lighting systems;

financing costs; site preparation costs; and professional service costs. DOR

authorizes the allocation of the tax increments until the TID terminates or, generally,

20 years, 23 years, or 27 years after the TID is created, depending on the type of TID

and the year in which it was created. Under certain circumstances, the life of the TID

and the allocation period may be extended.

Currently, before a TID may be created or its project plan amended, the city or

village must adopt a resolution containing a finding that the equalized value of

taxable property of the TID plus the value increment of all existing TIDs does not

exceed 12 percent of the total equalized value of taxable property in the city or village

(the "12-percent test"), subject to one exception.

Notwithstanding the 12-percent test, this bill specifies, with regard to TID

number 4, which the village of Elmwood created, or attempted to create on January

1, 2006, based on action taken by the village board on May 8, 2006, that DOR must

proceed as if the TID was created on January 1, 2006, except that DOR may not

certify a value increment before 2009.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Harsdorf (R)

1 cosponsors

Murtha (R)

Votes

Senate: Report introduction and adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue, Ayes 7, Noes 0 by committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue

Passed 7–0 Dec 22, 2009 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Withdrawn from the calendar of 1-21-2010 and referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

Passed 5–0 Jan 20, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Read a third time and passed, Ayes 33, Noes 0

Passed 33–0 Jan 21, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Mar 13, 2009 · Senate

    Introduced by Senator Harsdorf;Cosponsored by Representative Murtha

  2. Mar 13, 2009 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue

  3. Apr 9, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Oct 28, 2009 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  5. Dec 22, 2009 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  6. Dec 22, 2009 · Senate

    Report introduction and adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue, Ayes 7, Noes 0 by committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue

  7. Dec 22, 2009 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  8. Dec 22, 2009 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  9. Jan 19, 2010 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 1-21-2010 by committee on Senate Organization

  10. Jan 20, 2010 · Senate

    Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and placed on the calendar of 1-21-2010 by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  11. Jan 20, 2010 · Senate

    Withdrawn from the calendar of 1-21-2010 and referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  12. Jan 21, 2010 · Senate

    Read a second time

  13. Jan 21, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 adopted

  14. Jan 21, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  15. Jan 21, 2010 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  16. Jan 21, 2010 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 33, Noes 0

  17. Jan 21, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  18. Jan 25, 2010 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  19. Jan 26, 2010 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  20. Feb 23, 2010 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 2-25-2010 by committee on Rules

  21. Feb 25, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  22. Feb 25, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  23. Feb 25, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  24. Feb 25, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in

  25. Feb 25, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  26. Feb 26, 2010 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  27. Mar 4, 2010 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 3-4-2010

  28. Mar 11, 2010 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 3-11-2010

  29. Mar 16, 2010 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 3-15-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 170

  30. Mar 19, 2010 · Senate

    Published 3-29-2010