Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
the method by which the Department of Revenue makes certain calculations regarding tax incremental financing district number 4 in the village of Elmwood.
- Introduced, completed
- Passes Senate, completed
- Passes Assembly, completed
- Governor signs, completed
- Law, completed
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under the current tax incremental financing program, a city or village may
create a tax incremental district (TID) in part of its territory to foster development
if at least 50 percent of the area to be included in the TID is blighted, in need of
rehabilitation or conservation, suitable for industrial sites, or suitable for mixed-use
development. Before a city or village may create a TID, several steps and plans are
required. These steps and plans include public hearings on the proposed TID within
specified time frames, preparation and adoption by the local planning commission
of a proposed project plan for the TID, approval of the proposed project plan by the
common council or village board, and adoption of a resolution by the common council
or village board that creates the TID as of a date provided in the resolution.
Also under current law, once a TID has been created, the Department of
Revenue (DOR) calculates the "tax increment base value" of the TID, which is the
equalized value of all taxable property within the TID at the time of its creation. If
the development in the TID increases the value of the property in the TID above the
base value, a "value increment" is created. That portion of taxes collected on the
value increment in excess of the base value is called a "tax increment." The tax
increment is placed in a special fund that may be used only to pay back the project
costs of the TID. The costs of a TID, which are initially incurred by the creating city
or village, include public works, such as sewers, streets, and lighting systems;
financing costs; site preparation costs; and professional service costs. DOR
authorizes the allocation of the tax increments until the TID terminates or, generally,
20 years, 23 years, or 27 years after the TID is created, depending on the type of TID
and the year in which it was created. Under certain circumstances, the life of the TID
and the allocation period may be extended.
Currently, before a TID may be created or its project plan amended, the city or
village must adopt a resolution containing a finding that the equalized value of
taxable property of the TID plus the value increment of all existing TIDs does not
exceed 12 percent of the total equalized value of taxable property in the city or village
(the "12-percent test"), subject to one exception.
Notwithstanding the 12-percent test, this bill specifies, with regard to TID
number 4, which the village of Elmwood created, or attempted to create on January
1, 2006, based on action taken by the village board on May 8, 2006, that DOR must
proceed as if the TID was created on January 1, 2006, except that DOR may not
certify a value increment before 2009.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Senate: Report introduction and adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue, Ayes 7, Noes 0 by committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue
Passed 7–0 Dec 22, 2009 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Withdrawn from the calendar of 1-21-2010 and referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Jan 20, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Read a third time and passed, Ayes 33, Noes 0
Passed 33–0 Jan 21, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Mar 13, 2009 · Senate
Introduced by Senator Harsdorf;Cosponsored by Representative Murtha
- Mar 13, 2009 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue
- Apr 9, 2009 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 28, 2009 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Dec 22, 2009 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Dec 22, 2009 · Senate
Report introduction and adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue, Ayes 7, Noes 0 by committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue
- Dec 22, 2009 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue, Ayes 7, Noes 0
- Dec 22, 2009 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Jan 19, 2010 · Senate
Placed on calendar 1-21-2010 by committee on Senate Organization
- Jan 20, 2010 · Senate
Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and placed on the calendar of 1-21-2010 by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Jan 20, 2010 · Senate
Withdrawn from the calendar of 1-21-2010 and referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Jan 21, 2010 · Senate
Read a second time
- Jan 21, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 adopted
- Jan 21, 2010 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Jan 21, 2010 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Jan 21, 2010 · Senate
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 33, Noes 0
- Jan 21, 2010 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Jan 25, 2010 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Jan 26, 2010 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
- Feb 23, 2010 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 2-25-2010 by committee on Rules
- Feb 25, 2010 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Feb 25, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 25, 2010 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Feb 25, 2010 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in
- Feb 25, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 26, 2010 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Mar 4, 2010 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled on 3-4-2010
- Mar 11, 2010 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 3-11-2010
- Mar 16, 2010 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 3-15-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 170
- Mar 19, 2010 · Senate
Published 3-29-2010