Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
extraterritorial plat approval on basis of land's use.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Current law specifies whether a county, town, city, or village has the right to
approve or object to a plat (the map of a subdivision). Generally, the location of the
subdivision determines which local governmental unit or units have the right to
approve the plat. However, if a subdivision lies in the unincorporated area within
three miles of the corporate limits of a first, second, or third class city, or within one
and one-half miles of a fourth class city or village, the governing body of the city or
village has the right to approve the plat under its extraterritorial plat approval
jurisdiction, as well as the board of the town within which the subdivision lies and
the planning agency of the county within which the subdivision lies if the planning
agency employs on a full-time basis a professional engineer, a planner, or another
person charged with administering zoning or other planning legislation. Approval
of a plat is conditioned on, among other things, the plat's compliance with the local
ordinances and a comprehensive, master, or development plan of the local
governmental unit or units that have the right to approve the plat.
In
Wood v. City of Madison
, 2003 WI 24, 260 Wis. 2d 71, 659 N.W. 2d 31, the
Wisconsin Supreme Court determined that a city with extraterritorial plat approval
jurisdiction over a plat could object to the plat on the basis of the proposed use of land
outside the city limits.
Wood
overruled
Boucher Lincoln-Mercury v. Madison Plan
Comm.
, 178 Wis. 2d 74, 503 N.W. 2d 265 (Ct. App. 1993), which held that
extraterritorial plat approval or denial based on the use of the land in the plat is
unilateral land use control (or zoning), and that the statutes require extraterritorial
zoning to be a cooperative effort between the city and the town in which the zoning
ordinance is in effect.
This bill prohibits a municipality (city or village) from denying approval of a
plat or certified survey map on the basis of the proposed use of land within the
extraterritorial plat approval jurisdiction of the municipality unless the denial is
based on a plan or regulations adopted under the statute referred to in
Boucher
Lincoln-Mercury
that sets out the requirements for the cooperative effort between
the municipality and the town for extraterritorial zoning.
Sponsors
Votes
Senate: Report passage recommended by committee on Rural Issues, Biofuels, and Information Technology, Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Mar 4, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Mar 17, 2009 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Kreitlow, Vinehout, Holperin, Harsdorf and Olsen;Cosponsored by Representatives Smith, Jorgensen, Roth, Hubler, Schneider, Vruwink, Danou, Fields, Clark, Dexter, Ripp, Kerkman, Kestell, Bies, Brooks, Gunderson, A. Ott and Ballweg
- Mar 17, 2009 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Rural Issues, Biofuels, and Information Technology
- Sep 23, 2009 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Mar 3, 2010 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Mar 4, 2010 · Senate
Report passage recommended by committee on Rural Issues, Biofuels, and Information Technology, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Mar 4, 2010 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Apr 28, 2010 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1