Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Senate Bill 122

Notice of intent to remove a child from the home of a relative and review of decisions or orders involving the placement and care of a child placed in the home of a relative

Topics: Children and Families, Department of, Children: Protection and services, County: Human services, Family

Stopped in committee

It never got a ⁠, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Mar 17, 2009

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. No public hearing was held.

  3. Senate vote, not reached

  4. Assembly vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It never got a hearing in the Senate Committee on Children and Families and Workforce Development. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, if a child has been placed in a foster home, treatment foster home, or group home for six months or longer, the Department of Children and Families (DCF), the Department of Corrections, the county department of human services or social services (county department), or licensed child welfare agency (collectively, "agency") that placed the child must give the head of the home written notice of intent to remove the child from the home, stating the reasons for the removal. In those cases, the child may not be removed from the home before completion of a hearing before DCF or the circuit court to review the removal decision, if a hearing has been requested, or 30 days after receipt of the notice of intent to remove, whichever is later, unless the safety of the child requires removal.

Also, under current law, any decision or order issued by an agency that affects the head of a foster home, treatment foster home, or group home or the children involved may be appealed to DCF under fair hearing procedures. Under those procedures, the head of the home is entitled to be represented by counsel, to examine documents and records, to bring witnesses, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and to have judicial review of DCF's decision.

Read the full summary

In addition, under current law, an interested party may file a petition with the circuit court for the county where a child is placed alleging that a decision or order of the agency supervising the child's placement is not in the best interests of the child.

On receipt of a petition, the circuit court may call a hearing for the purpose of reviewing the decision or order. If the child is placed in a foster home, the foster parent may present relevant evidence at the hearing.

This bill grants to a relative, other than a parent, in whose home a child is placed the same procedural rights relating to notice of intent to remove a child from the home and review of decisions or orders involving the placement and care of the child that are granted a foster parent under current law. Specifically, under the bill:

1. The agency that placed the child in the home of the relative must give the relative written notice of intent to remove the child from the home, stating the reasons for the removal, and the child may not be removed from the home before completion of a hearing before DCF or the circuit court to review the removal decision, if a hearing has been requested, or 30 days after receipt of the notice of intent to remove, whichever is later, unless the safety of the child requires removal.

2. Any decision or order issued by an agency that affects the relative or the child may be appealed to DCF under fair hearing procedures that include the rights to be represented by counsel, to examine documents and records, to bring witnesses, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and to have judicial review of DCF's decision.

3. The relative may file a petition with the circuit court for the county where the child is placed alleging that a decision or order of the agency supervising the child's placement is not in the best interests of the child, the circuit court may call a hearing for the purpose of reviewing the decision or order, and the relative may present relevant evidence at the hearing.

Who's behind it

2 senators are its ⁠. All 2 are Democrats.

9 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 11 names

Authors (2)

Signed on in support (9)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Oct 26, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  3. Aug 13, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  4. Apr 2, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  5. Apr 1, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  6. Mar 17, 2009

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Children and Families and Workforce Development.

  7. Mar 17, 2009

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Mar 17, 2009 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Taylor and Lassa;Cosponsored by Representatives Grigsby, Young, Turner, Pasch, Fields, A. Williams, Berceau, Ballweg and Sinicki

  2. Mar 17, 2009 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Children and Families and Workforce Development

  3. Apr 1, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Apr 2, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Apr 2, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Aug 13, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  7. Oct 26, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  8. Apr 28, 2010 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate