Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Senate Bill 123

Regulating the transportation of aquatic plants and aquatic animals, the administration of federal funds for the control and eradication of noxious weeds, the placement of vehicles, seaplanes, watercraft, and other objects in navigable waters, the regulation of noxious weeds by municipalities, the disposal of invasive species, providing an exemption from rule-making procedures, requiring the exercise of rule-making authority, and providing a penalty

Topics: Administrative rules, Aviation, Boat, Environmental protection, Fish and fishing, Fish and game warden, Natural Resources, Department of: Environmental protection, Police, Solid waste management, Waterways and water power, Weeds

Became law

The governor signed it on Oct 28, 2009. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Mar 17, 2009

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed May 13, 2009

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 58 to 36

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2009 Wisconsin Act 55

Latest entry in the official record, Nov 2, 2009: “Published 11-11-2009.”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) administers various laws to control invasive species. DNR also regulates the placement of certain boats, boat trailers, and equipment (boats) in navigable waters with aquatic plants attached. This draft makes various changes to those laws and imposes new restrictions relating to invasive species and aquatic plants and animals.

Placement of certain objects in navigable waters Under current law, no person may place or use a boat in a navigable water if the person has reason to believe that it has any aquatic plants attached. Current law also prohibits the placement or use of a boat in the Lower St. Croix River if the person has reason to believe that the boat has zebra mussels attached. This bill expands these restrictions by prohibiting the placement or operation of any vehicle, seaplane, watercraft, or other object of any kind in a navigable water if the object has any aquatic plants or aquatic animals attached. Under the bill, this prohibition applies regardless of whether the person had reason to believe that such plants or animals are attached. The bill specifies that the prohibition does not require a person to remove attached aquatic plants or animals during the period of time when the object is being used in the same navigable body of water in which the aquatic plants or animals became attached.

Read the full summary

Current law authorizes a law enforcement officer to order a person to remove aquatic plants from a boat before placing the boat in a navigable water and to remove a boat from, or to not place a boat in, a navigable water if the law enforcement officer has reason to believe that the boat has aquatic plants attached. This bill broadens this authority to allow a law enforcement officer to order removal of aquatic animals in addition to aquatic plants and to order their removal from any vehicle, seaplane, watercraft, or other object of any kind before placing it in a navigable water. Under this expanded authority a law enforcement officer may also order removal of any object from a navigable water.

Transportation of vehicles, watercraft, seaplanes, and other objects.

Current law prohibits any person, with certain exceptions, from transporting a boat on a highway if it has an invasive species attached to the boat. This bill expands this prohibition. Under this bill, no person may transport or operate a vehicle, watercraft, or other object of any kind on a highway with aquatic plants or aquatic animals attached. The bill also prohibits a person from taking off with a seaplane with such plants or animals attached. The bill also authorizes, with certain exceptions, a law enforcement officer to order a person not to take off with a seaplane or not to transport or operate a vehicle, watercraft, or other object on a highway if the law enforcement officer has reason to believe that it has aquatic plants or aquatic animals attached. Under the bill, the transportation restrictions do not apply to certain persons, including a person who transports commercial aquatic plant harvesting equipment for the purpose of cleaning the equipment to remove aquatic plants or aquatic animals or to a person who transports duckweed that is incidentally attached to the object being transported.

Invasive species compliance investigation and department authority Under current law, DNR administers a statewide program to control invasive species. This bill authorizes DNR, for the purpose of administering and enforcing the statewide invasive species program, to conduct compliance investigations. The bill authorizes a DNR warden or other DNR representative to enter certain premises, other than a dwelling, where invasive species are stored, where records relating to invasive species are kept, where vehicles, boats, equipment, or materials used to transport or hold invasive species are located, or where activities related to invasive species are conducted. It also authorizes DNR to inspect invasive species stored or possessed by any person, inspect records or reports relating to invasive species, take diagnostic samples, and seize and destroy certain invasive species.

This bill also establishes DNR's authority to hold hearings relating to any aspect of the administration of the statewide invasive species program. It also authorizes DNR to waive compliance with certain requirements of the program or shorten time periods under the program to the extent necessary to prevent an emergency condition threatening public health, safety, or welfare or the environment. The bill requires every state agency to cooperate with DNR in the administration of the statewide invasive species program where the interests of DNR and the respective state agency overlaps.

Rules Under current law, DNR is required to promulgate rules to identify, classify, and control invasive species for the purposes of the statewide invasive species program. This bill authorizes DNR to promulgate an emergency rule to identify, classify, or control an invasive species without providing evidence of an emergency.

Under the bill, a rule promulgated in this manner remains in effect until the earlier of two years after the rule's effective date, the repeal of the rule, or the date on which a corresponding permanent rule takes effect.

Other provisions Under current law, any person who owns land is required to destroy noxious weeds on that land. Noxious weeds are defined to include certain weeds such as Canada thistle, leafy spurge, and any other weed that a municipality or county by ordinance or resolution declares to be noxious within its respective borders. This bill expands the definition of a noxious weed to include any weed that DNR designates as a noxious weed by rule.

Under current law, with limited exceptions, no person may dispose of yard waste in a solid waste disposal facility. This bill provides that the prohibition does not apply to the disposal of plants that are classified by DNR as invasive species or seeds of those plants, if the plants or seeds are not commingled with other yard waste.

Who's behind it

7 senators are its ⁠. All 7 are Democrats.

14 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 21 names

Authors (7)

Signed on in support (14)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 4 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Environment vote on an amendment

Passed, 5 to 0 · May 7, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Environment, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Natural Resources vote to recommend it

Passed, 9 to 6 · Jun 16, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by committee on Natural Resources, Ayes 9, Noes 6”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 58 to 36 · Sep 22, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 58, Noes 36, Paired 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 50 to 45 · Sep 22, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 50, Noes 45”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Nov 2, 2009

    The new law was published.

  2. Oct 28, 2009

    The governor signed it. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 55.

  3. Oct 27, 2009

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Sep 22, 2009

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  5. Sep 22, 2009

    The Assembly passed it too, 58 to 36.

  6. Jun 16, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  7. Jun 16, 2009

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 9 to 6.

  8. May 14, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Natural Resources.

  9. May 14, 2009

    The Assembly received it.

  10. May 13, 2009

    The Senate passed it.

  11. May 13, 2009

    The Senate adopted it.

  12. May 13, 2009

    1 more senator signed on in support.

  13. May 7, 2009

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.

  14. May 7, 2009

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Environment, Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  15. Apr 14, 2009

    The committee held a public hearing.

  16. Apr 2, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  17. Mar 17, 2009

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Environment.

  18. Mar 17, 2009

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Mar 17, 2009 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Jauch, Holperin, Lassa, Lehman, Plale, Risser and Sullivan;Cosponsored by Representatives Milroy, Pocan, A. Ott, Fields, Hraychuck, Hubler, Richards, Seidel, Sherman, Sinicki, Spanbauer, Staskunas and Steinbrink

  2. Mar 17, 2009 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Environment

  3. Apr 2, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Apr 14, 2009 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  5. Apr 21, 2009 · Senate

    LRB correction

  6. May 4, 2009 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Jauch

  7. May 6, 2009 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  8. May 7, 2009 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Environment, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  9. May 7, 2009 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Environment, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  10. May 7, 2009 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  11. May 12, 2009 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 5-13-2009 by committee on Senate Organization

  12. May 12, 2009 · Senate

    Senate amendment 2 offered by Senator Jauch

  13. May 13, 2009 · Senate

    Senator Miller added as a coauthor

  14. May 13, 2009 · Senate

    Read a second time

  15. May 13, 2009 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 adopted

  16. May 13, 2009 · Senate

    Senate amendment 2 withdrawn and returned to author

  17. May 13, 2009 · Senate

    Senate amendment 3 offered by Senator Jauch

  18. May 13, 2009 · Senate

    Senate amendment 3 adopted

  19. May 13, 2009 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  20. May 13, 2009 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  21. May 13, 2009 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  22. May 13, 2009 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  23. May 14, 2009 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  24. May 14, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Natural Resources

  25. May 20, 2009 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  26. Jun 16, 2009 · Assembly

    Report concurrence recommended by committee on Natural Resources, Ayes 9, Noes 6

  27. Jun 16, 2009 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  28. Sep 17, 2009 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 9-22-2009 by committee on Rules

  29. Sep 22, 2009 · Assembly

    Representative Spanbauer withdrawn as a cosponsor

  30. Sep 22, 2009 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  31. Sep 22, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Gottlieb

  32. Sep 22, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 50, Noes 45

  33. Sep 22, 2009 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  34. Sep 22, 2009 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  35. Sep 22, 2009 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 58, Noes 36, Paired 2

  36. Sep 22, 2009 · Assembly

    Representative Pasch added as a cosponsor

  37. Sep 22, 2009 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  38. Sep 23, 2009 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  39. Sep 28, 2009 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 9-28-2009

  40. Oct 27, 2009 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 10-27-2009

  41. Oct 28, 2009 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 10-28-2009. 2009 Wisconsin Act 55

  42. Nov 2, 2009 · Senate

    Published 11-11-2009.

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote