Skip to content

Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session

SB 131

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

authorizing the cities of Cudahy and Oak Creek to use environmental remediation tax increments generated by one environmental tax incremental district to benefit another environmental remediation tax incremental district.

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Senate, not reached
  3. Passes Assembly, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, the environmental remediation tax incremental financing

program permits a city, village, town, or county (political subdivision) to recoup the

costs of remediating contaminated property from property taxes that are levied on

the remediated property. The mechanism for financing remediation costs is very

similar to the mechanism for financing project costs under the tax incremental

financing (TIF) program.

Initially, the governing body of a political subdivision adopts a resolution

creating an environmental remediation tax incremental district (ERTID) with

particular boundaries. This resolution is then reviewed by a joint review board made

up of representatives of the overlying taxing jurisdictions. If the joint review board

approves the ERTID, a political subdivision that has incurred eligible costs to

remediate environmental pollution on a parcel of property may apply to the

Department of Revenue (DOR) to certify the environmental remediation tax

incremental base of the parcel. DOR is required to certify the environmental

remediation tax incremental base if the political subdivision submits to DOR all of

the following: 1) a statement that the political subdivision has incurred some eligible

costs, together with a detailed proposed remedial action plan approved by the

Department of Natural Resources (DNR) that contains cost estimates for anticipated

eligible costs, a schedule for the design and implementation that is needed to

complete the remediation, and certification from DNR that it has approved the site

investigation report that relates to the parcel; 2) a statement that all taxing

jurisdictions with authority to levy general property taxes on the parcel of property

have been notified that the political subdivision intends to recover its environmental

remediation costs by using an environmental remediation tax increment; and 3) a

statement that the political subdivision has attempted to recover its environmental

remediation costs from the person who is responsible for the environmental pollution

that is being remediated. Thereafter, the political subdivision that created the

ERTID may use positive environmental remediation tax increments to pay eligible

costs of remediating environmental pollution in the ERTID.

Currently, the maximum life of an ERTID is 23 years and no expenditure for

an eligible cost may be made by a political subdivision later than 15 years after the

environmental remediation tax incremental base is certified by DOR. Alternately,

an ERTID must terminate before its 23 year maximum life span if a political

subdivision receives sufficient environmental remediation tax increments to cover

all of its eligible costs.

This bill allows ERTID number one in the city of Cudahy and ERTID number

one in the city of Oak Creek to continue generating environmental remediation tax

increments after all of the eligible costs for each ERTID have been recovered. These

increments would be applied, respectively, to ERTID number two in the city of

Cudahy and an ERTID yet to be created in the city of Oak Creek. ERTID number

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Plale (D)

5 cosponsors

Mason (D) , Molepske Jr. (D) , Richards (D) , Turner (D) , Zepnick (D)

Full history

  1. Mar 24, 2009 · Senate

    Introduced by Senator Plale;Cosponsored by Representatives Mason, Turner, Richards, Zepnick and Molepske Jr.

  2. Mar 24, 2009 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue

  3. Apr 13, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Apr 28, 2010 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1