Skip to content

Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session

SB 132

Became law Official bill text Atom feed

expanding the life of a tax incremental district in the city of Racine.

  1. Introduced, completed
  2. Passes Senate, completed
  3. Passes Assembly, completed
  4. Governor signs, completed
  5. Law, completed

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under the current tax incremental financing program, a city or village may

create a tax incremental district (TID) in part of its territory to foster development

if at least 50 percent of the area to be included in the TID is blighted, in need of

rehabilitation or conservation, suitable for industrial sites, or suitable for mixed-use

development. Before a city or village may create a TID, several steps and plans are

required. These steps and plans include public hearings on the proposed TID within

specified time frames, preparation and adoption by the local planning commission

of a proposed project plan for the TID, approval of the proposed project plan by the

common council or village board, and adoption of a resolution by the common council

or village board that creates the TID as of a date provided in the resolution.

Also under current law, once a TID has been created, the Department of

Revenue (DOR) calculates the "tax increment base value" of the TID, which is the

equalized value of all taxable property within the TID at the time of its creation. If

the development in the TID increases the value of the property in the TID above the

base value, a "value increment" is created. That portion of taxes collected on the

value increment in excess of the base value is called a "tax increment." The tax

increment is placed in a special fund that may be used only to pay back the project

costs of the TID. The costs of a TID, which are initially incurred by the creating city

or village, include public works such as sewers, streets, and lighting systems;

financing costs; site preparation costs; and professional service costs. DOR

authorizes the allocation of the tax increments until the TID terminates or, generally,

20 years, 23 years, or 27 years after the TID is created, depending on the type of TID

and the year in which it was created. Under certain circumstances, the life of the TID

and the allocation period may be extended. Also under current law, a city or village

may not generally make expenditures for project costs later than five years before

the unextended termination date of the TID.

Under this bill, for TID Number 2 in the city of Racine, the 27-year life of the

TID and the period of time during which DOR may authorize tax increments is

extended from 2010 to 2020, and the expenditure period is extended from 2005 to

2015.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Coggs (D) , Lehman (D) , Plale (D) , Wirch (D)

3 cosponsors

Mason (D) , Turner (D) , Zepnick (D)

Votes

Senate: Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue, Ayes 7, Noes 0

Passed 7–0 Oct 23, 2009 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Read a third time and passed, Ayes 27, Noes 5

Passed 27–5 Oct 27, 2009 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 58, Noes 36

Passed 58–36 Oct 29, 2009 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Assembly amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 50, Noes 44

Passed 50–44 Oct 29, 2009 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Mar 24, 2009 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Lehman, Plale, Coggs and Wirch;Cosponsored by Representatives Mason, Turner and Zepnick

  2. Mar 24, 2009 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue

  3. Apr 6, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Apr 8, 2009 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Lehman

  5. Apr 14, 2009 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  6. Oct 22, 2009 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  7. Oct 23, 2009 · Senate

    Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)

  8. Oct 23, 2009 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 10-27-2009 by committee on Senate Organization

  9. Oct 23, 2009 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  10. Oct 23, 2009 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  11. Oct 23, 2009 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  12. Oct 23, 2009 · Senate

    Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)

  13. Oct 27, 2009 · Senate

    Read a second time

  14. Oct 27, 2009 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 adopted

  15. Oct 27, 2009 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  16. Oct 27, 2009 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  17. Oct 27, 2009 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 27, Noes 5

  18. Oct 27, 2009 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  19. Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  20. Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  21. Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 10-29-2009 by committee on Rules

  22. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Rules suspended to withdraw from calendar and take up

  23. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  24. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representatives Gottlieb, Vos and LeMahieu

  25. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 50, Noes 44

  26. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  27. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  28. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 58, Noes 36

  29. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  30. Oct 29, 2009 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  31. Nov 3, 2009 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 11-3-2009

  32. Nov 10, 2009 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 11-10-2009

  33. Nov 12, 2009 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 11-12-2009. 2009 Wisconsin Act 67

  34. Nov 17, 2009 · Senate

    Published 11-25-2009.