Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
motor vehicle operating privileges, seizures by courts or law enforcement officers of operator's licenses, and reinstatement of canceled identification cards.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, if a court suspends or revokes a person's operating privilege,
the court must take possession of the person's operator's license and forward it to the
Department of Transportation (DOT). If a person is arrested for operating a motor
vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant (OWI), a law enforcement officer
requests the person to take a test to determine the amount of alcohol in his or her
blood or breath, and the person either refuses to take the test or the test results
indicate a prohibited alcohol concentration, the officer must take possession of the
person's operator's license and forward it to DOT.
Under this bill, a court that suspends or revokes a person's operating privilege
may take possession of a person's operator's license but is not required to do so. If
a court does take possession of a person's operator's license, the court must destroy
the license. Upon reinstatement of the person's operating privilege, instead of
returning the license, DOT must issue a new license. Also, a law enforcement officer
who arrests a person for OWI may not take possession of a person's operator's license.
The bill also allows a person who is otherwise eligible to obtain an occupational
license to do so without surrendering his or her revoked operator's license.
Under current law, if a court suspends a person's operating privilege for certain
violations and at the time of the suspension the person does not have a valid
operator's license, the period of operating privilege suspension does not begin until
the person is eligible and applies for an operator's license or until a specified period
of time elapses, whichever occurs first.
Under this bill, a person need not apply for issuance, renewal, or reinstatement
of an operator's license to trigger the commencement of the period of operating
privilege suspension. The period of operating privilege suspension begins when the
person first becomes eligible for issuance, renewal, or reinstatement of an operator's
license. This bill also eliminates the requirement that a nonresident whose
operating privilege is revoked in this state obtain a valid operator's license issued by
his or her resident state as a condition of reinstatement by DOT of the nonresident's
operating privilege.
Current law provides in most cases for automatic reinstatement of a person's
suspended operating privilege after the period of operating privilege suspension has
terminated and the person has paid the reinstatement fee. However, after revocation
of a person's operating privilege, disqualification of a person's authorization to
operate a commercial motor vehicle, or cancellation of a person's operator's license,
in most cases reinstatement requires DOT to issue a new operator's license.
Reinstated licenses expire two years from the person's next birthday.
This bill provides for automatic reinstatement of a person's revoked operating
privilege if the applicable period of revocation has expired and the person has applied
for reinstatement and paid to DOT the applicable fee. The bill also provides for
automatic reinstatement of a person's canceled operator's license or identification
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Senate: Report passage recommended by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources, Ayes 6, Noes 1
Passed 6–1 May 1, 2009 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 May 12, 2009 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Report passage recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 12, Noes 4
Passed 12–4 Oct 29, 2009 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Mar 24, 2009 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Taylor, Lehman, Erpenbach, Grothman and Plale;Cosponsored by Representatives Grigsby, Fields, Young, Roys, A. Williams, Vruwink, Turner, Berceau, A. Ott, Sinicki, Colon, Honadel, Toles, Kessler and Mason
- Mar 24, 2009 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources
- Apr 16, 2009 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Apr 16, 2009 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- May 1, 2009 · Senate
Executive action taken
- May 1, 2009 · Senate
Report passage recommended by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources, Ayes 6, Noes 1
- May 1, 2009 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- May 12, 2009 · Senate
Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Oct 28, 2009 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Oct 29, 2009 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Oct 29, 2009 · Senate
Report passage recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 12, Noes 4
- Apr 28, 2010 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1