Skip to content

Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session

SB 137

Became law Official bill text Atom feed

the definitions of motor bicycle and moped.

  1. Introduced, completed
  2. Passes Senate, completed
  3. Passes Assembly, completed
  4. Governor signs, completed
  5. Law, completed

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, a "moped" is defined to include a bicycle-type vehicle, which

has fully operative pedals and an engine that is an integral part of the vehicle, that

is capable of a speed of not more than 30 miles per hour with a 150-pound rider on

a dry, level, hard surface with no wind. A "motor bicycle" is defined as a bicycle to

which a power unit not an integral part of the vehicle has been added to permit the

vehicle to travel at a speed of not more than 30 miles per hour under the same

conditions. Certain legal consequences follow from the classification of a vehicle as

a moped or a motor bicycle. For example, a motor bicycle is exempt from the

requirement of vehicle registration with the Department of Transportation (DOT),

while a moped must be registered with DOT in the same manner as a motorcycle.

Also, with exceptions, mopeds are generally treated similarly to motorcycles for

purposes of traffic regulation and vehicle equipment requirements, while motor

bicycles are generally treated similarly to bicycles. However, a person must possess

a valid operator's license to operate on a highway either a moped or a motor bicycle.

This bill expands the definition of "motor bicycle" to include a two-wheeled or

three-wheeled vehicle that has fully operative pedals and an electric motor of less

than 750 watts and that is capable, when powered solely by the motor, of a maximum

speed of less than 20 miles per hour with a 170-pound rider on a dry, level, hard

surface with no wind. This definition is similar to the definition under current

federal law of "low-speed electric bicycle." The bill also specifies that such a vehicle

is not a moped.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: A. Lasee (R) , Harsdorf (R) , Holperin (D) , Schultz (R) , Taylor (D)

5 cosponsors

A. Ott (R) , Ballweg (R) , Berceau (D) , Sherman , Townsend (R)

Votes

Senate: Report passage recommended by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources, Ayes 7, Noes 0

Passed 7–0 May 1, 2009 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Report concurrence recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 11, Noes 0

Passed 11–0 Sep 16, 2009 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Mar 26, 2009 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Harsdorf, Holperin, Schultz, Taylor and A. Lasee;Cosponsored by Representatives Sherman, Berceau, Ballweg, A. Ott and Townsend

  2. Mar 26, 2009 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources

  3. Apr 9, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Apr 16, 2009 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  5. May 1, 2009 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  6. May 1, 2009 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  7. May 1, 2009 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  8. May 12, 2009 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 5-13-2009 by committee on Senate Organization

  9. May 13, 2009 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  10. May 13, 2009 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  11. May 13, 2009 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  12. May 13, 2009 · Senate

    Read a second time

  13. May 13, 2009 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  14. May 14, 2009 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  15. May 14, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation

  16. Jul 16, 2009 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  17. Sep 10, 2009 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  18. Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly

    Report concurrence recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 11, Noes 0

  19. Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  20. Jan 13, 2010 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 1-19-2010 by committee on Rules

  21. Jan 19, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  22. Jan 19, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  23. Jan 19, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  24. Jan 19, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in

  25. Jan 19, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  26. Jan 19, 2010 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  27. Jan 22, 2010 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 1-22-2010

  28. Feb 9, 2010 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 2-9-2010

  29. Feb 11, 2010 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 2-11-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 122

  30. Feb 16, 2010 · Senate

    Published 2-25-2010