Senate Bill 161
Administration of certain public assistance programs in Milwaukee County, removing county civil service protections from certain employees, required provisions in certain collective bargaining agreements under the Municipal Employment Relations Act, and making an appropriation
Topics: Children and Families, Department of, Civil service, Collective bargaining, Day care, Employment Relations Commission, Health Services, Department of: Supportive living and treatment, Legislature: Retirement Systems, Joint Survey Committee on, Medical assistance, Public employee, Public welfare
Became law
The governor signed it on May 26, 2009. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Apr 8, 2009
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Apr 28, 2009
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed 54 to 45
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2009 Wisconsin Act 15
Latest entry in the official record, Jun 2, 2009: “Fiscal estimate received”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
The Department of Health Services (DHS) administers income maintenance programs under current law, as well as the programs that provide state supplemental payments to persons receiving federal supplemental security income (state supplemental payment programs). The income maintenance programs are specified in the statutes as the Medical Assistance program, including BadgerCare Plus; the food stamp program; and the program that pays funeral, burial, and cemetery expenses for persons whose estates are insufficient to pay those expenses.
Generally, income maintenance and state supplemental payment programs are administered by counties through contracts with DHS.
Read the full summary Show less
This bill requires DHS to establish a Milwaukee County enrollment services unit (unit) in DHS to determine eligibility for and administer income maintenance and state supplemental payment programs in Milwaukee County (county). In addition, the Department of Children and Families (DCF) may contract with DHS to have the unit perform eligibility and authorization functions in the county for DCF's child care subsidy program. Under the bill, DHS may contract with the county for the performance by the county of administrative functions under the income maintenance and state supplemental payment programs and, if DCF so contracts with DHS, for the performance of the eligibility and authorization functions under the child care subsidy program. The county is required to expend a certain specified amount for the operation of income maintenance programs in the county, and DHS must reimburse the county for all approved costs that exceed that amount for the operation of the income maintenance and state supplemental payment programs in the county and, if DCF so contracts with DHS, for the performance of the eligibility and authorization functions under the child care subsidy program in the county. The bill also requires DHS and Milwaukee County, at a specified time in the future, to discuss who will operate the income maintenance programs in the county in the future and how the programs will be operated.
The bill requires that supervisory personnel in the unit be state employees and that all other employees in the unit may be a combination of state employees and county employees. Milwaukee County is required to maintain for the unit no fewer represented authorized full-time employee positions than the number of represented employee positions that were authorized on February 1, 2009, to perform the functions that the unit will perform under the bill. Under the bill, DHS has the authority to supervise, hire, transfer, suspend, lay off, recall, promote, discharge, assign, reward, discipline, and adjust grievances with respect to county employees performing services for the unit. The bill provides that any DHS employment decision affecting county employees may be appealed to the Employment Relations Commission, as are decisions affecting state employees. In addition, DHS must use the same employment process and procedures that are used for appointments to the classified service of the state civil service system, including specifically the use of probationary periods. County employees performing services for the unit are subject to the same residency requirements as are other employees of Milwaukee County under the county's civil service rules.
The bill provides certain enhanced benefits for county employees who are appointed as state employees and are employed in the unit. First, the employee must have his or her seniority with the state computed by treating the employee's total service with the county as state service. Second, the employee's annual leave and accrued sick leave must be based on both county and state years of service. Third, the employee is immediately covered for employer contributions towards health care coverage insurance when the employee becomes insured, unlike other most other state employees who must wait until the first day of the third month after beginning state employment. Finally, the employee is given the option of remaining a participant in the Milwaukee County Employees' Retirement System as opposed to becoming covered under the Wisconsin Retirement System.
Under current law, every county with a population of at least 500,000 (presently only Milwaukee County) is required to have a civil service system for county employees who are in the classified service. The civil service procedures that apply to classified employees relate to issues such as competitive examinations, hiring, disciplinary procedures, and standardized scales of compensation. County employees who are in the unclassified service are not subject to the civil service procedures, and state statutes specify which county employees are in the unclassified service. Under the bill, nonsupervisory county employees who perform staff services for the unit are placed in the unclassified service for purposes of the county civil service provisions of the statutes.
Under the bill, a collective bargaining agreement that covers county employees who perform services for the unit must contain a provision that permits the terms of the agreement to be modified, with respect to hours and conditions of employment, by a memorandum of understanding entered into with DHS.
Current law contains various provisions for the recovery of both correctly made and incorrectly made payments under programs administered by DHS, including income maintenance and state supplemental payment programs. Generally, if the efforts of an employee of a county are responsible for a recovery, the county may retain a portion of the amount recovered. The bill provides that in Milwaukee County, no portion of amounts recovered through the efforts of a state or county employee are to be retained by Milwaukee County, but such amounts will be deposited in their entirety in the general fund and credited to an appropriation that pays for, among other things, recovery effort costs and activities related to error reduction.
Because this bill relates to public employee retirement or pensions, it may be referred to the Joint Survey Committee on Retirement Systems for a report to be printed as an appendix to the bill.
Who's behind it
3 senators are its . All 3 are Democrats.
5 more lawmakers .
See all 8 names Hide the names
Authors (3)
- Spencer Coggs · Democrat, Senate
- Jeffrey Plale · Democrat, Senate
- Lena Taylor · Democrat, Senate
Signed on in support (5)
- Jason Fields · Democrat, Assembly
- Tamara Grigsby · Democrat, Assembly
- Frederick Kessler · Democrat, Assembly
- Sandy Pasch · Democrat, Assembly
- Christine Sinicki · Democrat, Assembly
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 4 votes on this bill.
Senate Committee on Labor vote to recommend it
Passed, 3 to 2 · Apr 22, 2009
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs, Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote
Passed, 53 to 46 · Apr 28, 2009
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Decision of the Chair upheld, Ayes 53, Noes 46”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote to pass it
Passed, 54 to 45 · Apr 28, 2009
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 54, Noes 45”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote to pass it
Passed, 18 to 15 · Apr 28, 2009
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 18, Noes 15”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Jun 2, 2009
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
May 28, 2009
The new law was published.
-
May 26, 2009
The governor signed it. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 15.
-
May 22, 2009
Sent to the governor.
-
Apr 28, 2009
The Assembly passed it too, 54 to 45.
-
Apr 28, 2009
“Point of order that bill is not properly before the Assembly pursuant to Wis. Statutes 13.093 (3) and 16.47 (2) not well taken” (the official wording)
-
Apr 28, 2009
“Read” (the official wording)
-
Apr 28, 2009
The Assembly received it.
-
Apr 28, 2009
The Senate passed it, 18 to 15.
-
Apr 28, 2009
The Senate adopted it.
-
Apr 22, 2009
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 3 to 2.
-
Apr 20, 2009
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Apr 16, 2009
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Apr 14, 2009
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Apr 8, 2009
Sent to the Senate Committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs.
-
Apr 8, 2009
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Apr 8, 2009 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Taylor, Plale and Coggs;Cosponsored by Representatives Grigsby, Sinicki, Fields, Kessler and Pasch
- Apr 8, 2009 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs
- Apr 14, 2009 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Apr 16, 2009 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 16, 2009 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 16, 2009 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 20, 2009 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 22, 2009 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Apr 22, 2009 · Senate
Report passage recommended by committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs, Ayes 3, Noes 2
- Apr 22, 2009 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Apr 23, 2009 · Senate
Placed on calendar 4-28-2009 by committee on Senate Organization
- Apr 28, 2009 · Senate
Read a second time
- Apr 28, 2009 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Taylor
- Apr 28, 2009 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 adopted
- Apr 28, 2009 · Senate
Senate amendment 2 offered by Senator Taylor
- Apr 28, 2009 · Senate
Senate amendment 2 adopted
- Apr 28, 2009 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Apr 28, 2009 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Apr 28, 2009 · Senate
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 18, Noes 15
- Apr 28, 2009 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 28, 2009 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Apr 28, 2009 · Assembly
Read
- Apr 28, 2009 · Assembly
Rules suspended and taken up
- Apr 28, 2009 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Apr 28, 2009 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Apr 28, 2009 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Apr 28, 2009 · Assembly
Point of order that bill is not properly before the Assembly pursuant to Wis. Statutes 13.093 (3) and 16.47 (2) not well taken
- Apr 28, 2009 · Assembly
Decision of the Chair appealed
- Apr 28, 2009 · Assembly
Decision of the Chair upheld, Ayes 53, Noes 46
- Apr 28, 2009 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 54, Noes 45
- Apr 28, 2009 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 7:01 A.M. on 4-29-2009 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 8
- Apr 29, 2009 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 29, 2009 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- May 1, 2009 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled on 5-1-2009
- May 22, 2009 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 5-22-2009
- May 26, 2009 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 5-26-2009. 2009 Wisconsin Act 15
- May 28, 2009 · Senate
Published 5-28-2009.
- Jun 2, 2009 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote