Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Senate Bill 171

Retail theft, proof of ownership for flea market sales, and providing penalties

Topics: Crime and criminals, Crime and criminals: Felony, Data processing: Criminal acts and law enforcement, Sales

Stopped before the full Senate voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Senate never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Apr 23, 2009

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Senate never voted on it.

  4. Assembly vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, the penalty for retail theft is based on the value of the merchandise taken. Retail theft is a Class A misdemeanor if the value of the merchandise does not exceed $2,500, a Class I felony if the value of the merchandise exceeds $2,500 but does not exceed $5,000, a Class H felony if the value of the merchandise exceeds $5,000 but does not exceed $10,000, and a Class G felony if the value of the merchandise exceeds $10,000.

Also under current law a person may be convicted of engaging in organized crime, a Class E felony, if the person participates as part of an enterprise in the commission of at least three incidents of racketeering activity that have the same or similar intents, results, accomplices, victims, or methods of commission or otherwise are interrelated by distinguishing characteristics. "Racketeering activity" is the attempt, conspiracy to commit, or commission of various felonies including felony retail theft.

Read the full summary

This bill makes retail theft of merchandise a Class I felony, and racketeering activity, if the value of the merchandise exceeds $1,500 but does not exceed $5,000.

The bill also makes retail theft of merchandise that is valued at less than $1,500 a Class I felony, and racketeering activity, if the actor commits the theft with intent to sell the merchandise by means of the Internet. The bill further provides that evidence that a person sold merchandise that is similar to stolen merchandise, by means of the Internet and within 90 days preceding the theft, is evidence of the person's intent to sell the stolen merchandise by means of the Internet.

The bill also requires a person selling certain merchandise at a flea market or similar facility to have proof that the person owns the merchandise and to make the proof available to a law enforcement officer for inspection. The merchandise covered by the bill's requirements includes baby food, cosmetics, drugs, infant formula, and batteries. Under the bill, "proof of ownership" means all of the following: 1) the name, address, and telephone number of the supplier of the merchandise; 2) the name and address of the person that received the merchandise; and 3) a description of the merchandise. Violators are subject to a fine up to $500, up to 30 days' imprisonment, or both.

Who's behind it

8 senators are its ⁠. 6 are Democrats and 2 are Republicans.

17 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 25 names

Authors (8)

Signed on in support (17)

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Senate Committee on Judiciary vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 0 · Mar 4, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Mar 4, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.

  3. Feb 19, 2010

    “Report of joint review committee on Criminal Penalties received” (the official wording)

  4. Feb 5, 2010

    “Report of joint review committee on Criminal Penalties requested pursuant to s. 13.525 (5) Wisconsin Statutes” (the official wording)

  5. Feb 4, 2010

    The committee held a public hearing.

  6. Apr 23, 2009

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing.

  7. Apr 23, 2009

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Apr 23, 2009 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Taylor, Sullivan, Kreitlow, Holperin, Lassa, Wirch, Harsdorf and Darling;Cosponsored by Representatives Danou, Turner, Jorgensen, Pasch, Kestell, Van Roy, Brooks, Lothian, Kerkman, A. Ott, Steinbrink, Zepnick, Kleefisch, Kaufert, Bies, Hebl and Staskunas

  2. Apr 23, 2009 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing

  3. Feb 4, 2010 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  4. Feb 5, 2010 · Senate

    Report of joint review committee on Criminal Penalties requested pursuant to s. 13.525 (5) Wisconsin Statutes

  5. Feb 19, 2010 · Senate

    Report of joint review committee on Criminal Penalties received

  6. Mar 3, 2010 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  7. Mar 4, 2010 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  8. Mar 4, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  9. Apr 28, 2010 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote