Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
limiting a city's and village's use of direct annexation and authorizing limited town challenges to an annexation.
- Introduced, completed
- Passes Senate, completed
- Passes Assembly, completed
- Governor signs, completed
- Law, completed
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Currently, town territory that is contiguous to any city or village may be
annexed to that city or village under several methods if, in general, some of the city's
or village's territory is in the same county as the territory to be annexed, unless both
the town and county boards approve of the proposed annexation, and the city or
village agrees to make limited payments to the town based on property taxes that the
town levied on the annexed territory.
Three of the methods of annexation include the following: 1) direct annexation,
under which a petition for annexation that was signed by the required number of
electors and landowners is filed with the city or village clerk; 2) annexation by
referendum, under which a petition for referendum that was signed by the required
number of electors and landowners is filed with the city or village clerk, and a
referendum is held and passes in the town; and 3) annexation by court order and
referendum, under which the governing body of a city or village adopts a resolution
declaring its intention to apply to the circuit court for an order for an annexation
referendum.
Another method of annexation is direct annexation by unanimous approval. If
a petition for direct annexation by unanimous approval signed by all of the electors
residing in the territory and the owners of all of the real property in the territory is
filed with the city or village clerk and the town clerk of all of the involved towns, along
with a scale map and legal description of the property to be annexed, the governing
body of the city or village may, generally, annex the property by a two-thirds vote of
the body. Such an annexation, however, is subject to Department of Administration
advisory review as if the annexation petition were for direct, but not unanimous,
annexation or annexation by referendum.
Generally, cities and villages may also annex territory that is owned by the city
or village and that lies near but not necessarily contiguous to the city or village by
enacting an ordinance to annex such territory.
This bill limits the use of direct annexation by unanimous approval to town land
that is contiguous to the annexing city or village.
Under current law, a town may not challenge in court, on any grounds, any
direct annexation by unanimous approval as well as several other types of
annexations. Under this bill, a town may challenge direct annexation by unanimous
approval, as well as several other types of annexations, including annexation by
referendum initiated by a city or village and annexation of city-owned or
village-owned territory, but only on the issue of whether the territory proposed for
annexation is contiguous to the annexing city or village.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Senate: Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Apr 9, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Apr 23, 2009 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Holperin, A. Lasee and Schultz;Cosponsored by Representatives Jorgensen, Clark, Danou, Hilgenberg, Bies, Brooks, Gunderson, Kerkman, LeMahieu, A. Ott, Petersen, Ripp, Roth, Townsend and Vos
- Apr 23, 2009 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs
- May 8, 2009 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Nov 17, 2009 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 17, 2010 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Apr 2, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Holperin
- Apr 7, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 2 offered by Senator Holperin
- Apr 8, 2010 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Apr 9, 2010 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Apr 9, 2010 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Apr 9, 2010 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Apr 9, 2010 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Apr 14, 2010 · Senate
Placed on calendar 4-15-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Apr 15, 2010 · Senate
Read a second time
- Apr 15, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 withdrawn and returned to author
- Apr 15, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 2 adopted
- Apr 15, 2010 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Apr 15, 2010 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Apr 15, 2010 · Senate
Read a third time and passed
- Apr 15, 2010 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 11:35 A.M. on 4-20-2010 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 23
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 21, 2010 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- May 3, 2010 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled on 5-3-2010
- May 13, 2010 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 5-13-2010
- May 18, 2010 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 5-18-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 366
- May 20, 2010 · Senate
Published 6-1-2010