Skip to content

Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session

SB 172

Became law Official bill text Atom feed

limiting a city's and village's use of direct annexation and authorizing limited town challenges to an annexation.

  1. Introduced, completed
  2. Passes Senate, completed
  3. Passes Assembly, completed
  4. Governor signs, completed
  5. Law, completed

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Currently, town territory that is contiguous to any city or village may be

annexed to that city or village under several methods if, in general, some of the city's

or village's territory is in the same county as the territory to be annexed, unless both

the town and county boards approve of the proposed annexation, and the city or

village agrees to make limited payments to the town based on property taxes that the

town levied on the annexed territory.

Three of the methods of annexation include the following: 1) direct annexation,

under which a petition for annexation that was signed by the required number of

electors and landowners is filed with the city or village clerk; 2) annexation by

referendum, under which a petition for referendum that was signed by the required

number of electors and landowners is filed with the city or village clerk, and a

referendum is held and passes in the town; and 3) annexation by court order and

referendum, under which the governing body of a city or village adopts a resolution

declaring its intention to apply to the circuit court for an order for an annexation

referendum.

Another method of annexation is direct annexation by unanimous approval. If

a petition for direct annexation by unanimous approval signed by all of the electors

residing in the territory and the owners of all of the real property in the territory is

filed with the city or village clerk and the town clerk of all of the involved towns, along

with a scale map and legal description of the property to be annexed, the governing

body of the city or village may, generally, annex the property by a two-thirds vote of

the body. Such an annexation, however, is subject to Department of Administration

advisory review as if the annexation petition were for direct, but not unanimous,

annexation or annexation by referendum.

Generally, cities and villages may also annex territory that is owned by the city

or village and that lies near but not necessarily contiguous to the city or village by

enacting an ordinance to annex such territory.

This bill limits the use of direct annexation by unanimous approval to town land

that is contiguous to the annexing city or village.

Under current law, a town may not challenge in court, on any grounds, any

direct annexation by unanimous approval as well as several other types of

annexations. Under this bill, a town may challenge direct annexation by unanimous

approval, as well as several other types of annexations, including annexation by

referendum initiated by a city or village and annexation of city-owned or

village-owned territory, but only on the issue of whether the territory proposed for

annexation is contiguous to the annexing city or village.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: A. Lasee (R) , Holperin (D) , Schultz (R)

15 cosponsors

A. Ott (R) , Bies (R) , Brooks (R) , Clark (D) , Danou (D) , Gunderson (R) , Hilgenberg (D) , Jorgensen (D) , Kerkman (R) , LeMahieu (R) , Petersen (R) , Ripp (R) , Roth (R) , Townsend (R) , Vos (R)

Votes

Senate: Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0

Passed 5–0 Apr 9, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Apr 23, 2009 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Holperin, A. Lasee and Schultz;Cosponsored by Representatives Jorgensen, Clark, Danou, Hilgenberg, Bies, Brooks, Gunderson, Kerkman, LeMahieu, A. Ott, Petersen, Ripp, Roth, Townsend and Vos

  2. Apr 23, 2009 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs

  3. May 8, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Nov 17, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Feb 17, 2010 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  6. Apr 2, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Holperin

  7. Apr 7, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 2 offered by Senator Holperin

  8. Apr 8, 2010 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  9. Apr 9, 2010 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  10. Apr 9, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  11. Apr 9, 2010 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  12. Apr 9, 2010 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  13. Apr 14, 2010 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 4-15-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  14. Apr 15, 2010 · Senate

    Read a second time

  15. Apr 15, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 withdrawn and returned to author

  16. Apr 15, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 2 adopted

  17. Apr 15, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  18. Apr 15, 2010 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  19. Apr 15, 2010 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  20. Apr 15, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  21. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  22. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  23. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:35 A.M. on 4-20-2010 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 23

  24. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  25. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  26. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  27. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in

  28. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  29. Apr 21, 2010 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  30. May 3, 2010 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 5-3-2010

  31. May 13, 2010 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 5-13-2010

  32. May 18, 2010 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 5-18-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 366

  33. May 20, 2010 · Senate

    Published 6-1-2010