Skip to content

Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session

SB 173

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

the removal of nonconforming outdoor advertising signs.

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Senate, not reached
  3. Passes Assembly, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

The federal Highway Beautification Act requires states to restrict advertising

along interstate and federal-aid primary highways, and current state law

incorporates these requirements. Current law prohibits, with certain exceptions,

the erection or maintenance of outdoor advertising signs within 660 feet of, or

otherwise visible (and intended to be visible) from, the main-traveled way of an

interstate or federal-aid primary highway. The Department of Transportation may

remove signs that do not conform to applicable requirements but, for each sign

removed, must pay just compensation to the owner of the sign and to the owner of

the land on which the sign is located. Current law permits customary maintenance

of certain nonconforming signs but, if the nonconforming sign is enlarged, replaced,

or relocated, the sign may be removed without compensation.

This bill provides that any nonconforming sign may be removed without

compensation if the costs of repairing and maintaining the sign within any 36

consecutive months exceed 50 percent of the replacement costs of the sign and that

such repairs and maintenance do not constitute customary maintenance.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Grothman (R) , Hansen (D) , Kapanke (R) , Kreitlow (D) , Leibham (R) , Olsen (R) , Plale (D) , Taylor (D)

11 cosponsors

Fields (D) , Friske (R) , Gunderson (R) , Honadel (R) , Smith (D) , Soletski (D) , Spanbauer (R) , Staskunas (D) , Van Roy (R) , Vos (R) , Zepnick (D)

Votes

Senate: Report passage recommended by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources, Ayes 7, Noes 0

Passed 7–0 Sep 21, 2009 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Apr 23, 2009 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Kreitlow, Taylor, Grothman, Kapanke, Leibham, Olsen, Plale and Hansen;Cosponsored by Representatives Staskunas, Fields, Friske, Gunderson, Honadel, Smith, Soletski, Spanbauer, Van Roy, Vos and Zepnick

  2. Apr 23, 2009 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources

  3. May 14, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. May 21, 2009 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  5. Sep 17, 2009 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  6. Sep 21, 2009 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  7. Sep 21, 2009 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  8. Oct 13, 2009 · Senate

    Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)

  9. Apr 28, 2010 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1