Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
the removal of nonconforming outdoor advertising signs.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
The federal Highway Beautification Act requires states to restrict advertising
along interstate and federal-aid primary highways, and current state law
incorporates these requirements. Current law prohibits, with certain exceptions,
the erection or maintenance of outdoor advertising signs within 660 feet of, or
otherwise visible (and intended to be visible) from, the main-traveled way of an
interstate or federal-aid primary highway. The Department of Transportation may
remove signs that do not conform to applicable requirements but, for each sign
removed, must pay just compensation to the owner of the sign and to the owner of
the land on which the sign is located. Current law permits customary maintenance
of certain nonconforming signs but, if the nonconforming sign is enlarged, replaced,
or relocated, the sign may be removed without compensation.
This bill provides that any nonconforming sign may be removed without
compensation if the costs of repairing and maintaining the sign within any 36
consecutive months exceed 50 percent of the replacement costs of the sign and that
such repairs and maintenance do not constitute customary maintenance.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Senate: Report passage recommended by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources, Ayes 7, Noes 0
Passed 7–0 Sep 21, 2009 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Apr 23, 2009 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Kreitlow, Taylor, Grothman, Kapanke, Leibham, Olsen, Plale and Hansen;Cosponsored by Representatives Staskunas, Fields, Friske, Gunderson, Honadel, Smith, Soletski, Spanbauer, Van Roy, Vos and Zepnick
- Apr 23, 2009 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources
- May 14, 2009 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- May 21, 2009 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Sep 17, 2009 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Sep 21, 2009 · Senate
Report passage recommended by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources, Ayes 7, Noes 0
- Sep 21, 2009 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Oct 13, 2009 · Senate
Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)
- Apr 28, 2010 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1